Which saint theologian can we trust to lead this new Inquisition?
You seem to suggest yourself.
What will the test look like? Would it sort out 'true' from 'false' any better than the failed Ecumenical Councils?
Will waterboarding be added to the torture list?
Will the test be about history as taught by the bible vs secular history and so one must make a choice? Will it be on theology? Could you pass a test on theology?
Could you pass a test on gnostic christianity?
What's the penalty for 'failures' and how is it enforced?
And finally, will you accept the results if it's found that you failed the test?
I'm thinking maybe a LOT of people don't really know what this Christianity thing SHOULD be and it's pretty obvious that everyone can only see what they feel is BENEATH THEM and judge IT instead.
Blind leading the blind.
Been there, done that _____ Popes and their martyrs
Pretty over the Top response to the mere suggestion that some aren't as covered by the blood due to their own issues. I believe the OP's observation lacks the call for any kind of inquisition you presume to rail against. However if you are a church admin or elder or Preacher I can understand why you could be rattled by the idea of falling short of the glory of God. But that's between the individual and God himself and the time for that meeting is never when we expect it.
Which saint theologian can we trust to lead this new Inquisition?
You seem to suggest yourself.
What will the test look like? Would it sort out 'true' from 'false' any better than the failed Ecumenical Councils?
Will waterboarding be added to the torture list?
Will the test be about history as taught by the bible vs secular history and so one must make a choice? Will it be on theology? Could you pass a test on theology?
Could you pass a test on gnostic christianity?
What's the penalty for 'failures' and how is it enforced?
And finally, will you accept the results if it's found that you failed the test?
I'm thinking maybe a LOT of people don't really know what this Christianity thing SHOULD be and it's pretty obvious that everyone can only see what they feel is BENEATH THEM and judge IT instead.
Blind leading the blind.
Been there, done that _____ Popes and their martyrs
Pretty over the Top response to the mere suggestion that some aren't as covered by the blood due to their own issues. I believe the OP's observation lacks the call for any kind of inquisition you presume to rail against. However if you are a church admin or elder or Preacher I can understand why you could be rattled by the idea of falling short of the glory of God. But that's between the individual and God himself and the time for that meeting is never when we expect it.
Pretty over the top response to the mere suggestion that those who fall short of the glory seem to be the ones first to lay claim to authority.
You hit the point when you say it's between the individual and God himself and then counter that with your comments as judge.
That doesn't rattle me, I haven't made any false statements. it rattles the true judge.