Time. Give it time. Let the left, which includes Rattshitburger and Kemp, deny it one more time, then release the video. When this video hits the news cycles, and it will, heads will explode. We all saw it, and knew what was going on. Now Ruby Freeman is telling all.
By the way, I wonder, who set her up with those spy cams? Hmmmmm......
Why do you believe this is true? The website in the linked article is completely anonymous. There is zero information about who founded it, funds it, or works for it. There is no information out there that I can find concerning this that isn't using this same article as the source.
Do you generally just believe stuff without knowing anything about who is telling you it, or with zero collaborating evidence?
Did you watch those videos? Because the one I watched was of some "crisis management worker" obviously trying to intimidate her into co-operating with her in saying she illegally scanned ballots, but absolutely nothing where she (Freeman) ever did so.
Just because that website truthfully transcribed parts of the video doesn't mean they were truthful in transcribing all of it.
Wouldn't you agree the most important part of the video to show would be of Freeman admitting she illegally scanned ballots?
What good does it do the argument to only show people pressing her to cooperate with them?
Did you see any video of Freeman ever claiming that she illegally scanned ballots? Because for the life of me I don't see it anywhere in any of those links.
What I do see is evidence she was being pressured and intimidated in an effort to get her to admit she illegally scanned ballots.
So the info you're giving here is pretty much working against you.
I have to admit, I fell for it. Once I saw how many had viewed it, I had assumed it was real. It's not like we can wait on mainstream media to break stories, you know? That's the problem with our side. It's hard to find real, credible news. When something comes out that sounds good, we tend to believe it.
Also, I know nothing of the site, at all. I was simply trusting what was posted.
I'm sorry. I was jumping down your throat for no good reason. Just going through a bad time right now. Don't feel bad about trusting what you were being told. We all do it. You were very kind in your response. Much kinder than I deserved. Again, sorry for raking you over the coals.
Wonder how come they aren't showing the actual video so we can hear it ourselves.
Time. Give it time. Let the left, which includes Rattshitburger and Kemp, deny it one more time, then release the video. When this video hits the news cycles, and it will, heads will explode. We all saw it, and knew what was going on. Now Ruby Freeman is telling all.
By the way, I wonder, who set her up with those spy cams? Hmmmmm......
What "spy cams"?
Why do you believe this is true? The website in the linked article is completely anonymous. There is zero information about who founded it, funds it, or works for it. There is no information out there that I can find concerning this that isn't using this same article as the source.
Do you generally just believe stuff without knowing anything about who is telling you it, or with zero collaborating evidence?
I read your comment and I decided to check whether or not this story has any collaborating evidence. I did a search (I use Qwant.com rather than Google.com) using: 'Ruby Freeman bodycam footage Cobb County Police Station' as the search term. Amongst the search results returned, the 3rd result is an article from the Daily Beast titled: Trevian Kutti, Kanye Publicist, Urged Georgia Election Worker... The 5th and 6th results are both articles from Reuters titled: 'Kanye West publicist pressed Georgia election worker to confess...' and 'Exclusive: Georgia probe into Trump examines chaplain's role in ...' The second of the Reuters articles has an embeded twitter post which contains a 2:58 video of the bodycam footage showing Trevian Kutti talking to Ruby Freeman. In my view, the Georgiarecord.com story does have collaborating evidence.
Did you watch those videos? Because the one I watched was of some "crisis management worker" obviously trying to intimidate her into co-operating with her in saying she illegally scanned ballots, but absolutely nothing where she (Freeman) ever did so.
Just because that website truthfully transcribed parts of the video doesn't mean they were truthful in transcribing all of it.
Wouldn't you agree the most important part of the video to show would be of Freeman admitting she illegally scanned ballots?
What good does it do the argument to only show people pressing her to cooperate with them?
Did you see any video of Freeman ever claiming that she illegally scanned ballots? Because for the life of me I don't see it anywhere in any of those links.
What I do see is evidence she was being pressured and intimidated in an effort to get her to admit she illegally scanned ballots.
So the info you're giving here is pretty much working against you.
I have to admit, I fell for it. Once I saw how many had viewed it, I had assumed it was real. It's not like we can wait on mainstream media to break stories, you know? That's the problem with our side. It's hard to find real, credible news. When something comes out that sounds good, we tend to believe it.
Also, I know nothing of the site, at all. I was simply trusting what was posted.
I'm sorry. I was jumping down your throat for no good reason. Just going through a bad time right now. Don't feel bad about trusting what you were being told. We all do it. You were very kind in your response. Much kinder than I deserved. Again, sorry for raking you over the coals.