So a couple years ago (right around the cusp of me finding this place via a family friend) i had a really strange dream:
"I was in a hidden camp in the woods with a community of people. When all of a sudden they were all taken in a Trance which controlled and bid them to go on a boat and ride out to sea to the ones that called them. I tried as i could because my fiance was on that boat. Unfortunately their boat was overencumbered and it sank while i was trying to board."
When i woke up the Holy Ghost gave me the word Trance. I had presumed that was Him telling me to write a novel on the dream He had given me. Further down the road though while scrolling through the pages of .win, one of you beautiful pedes was used by God to lead me to Cathy Obrien's testimony if mkultra. I watched the entire hour and 57 minutes and was blown away by it all. There was something more unsettling though that the LORD brought me to realize. The reason He told me trance was because He wanted me to read cathy and mark's book, Trance- Formation of America.
Fast forward to somewhere within the early chapters of reading Cathy's book, i had another dream:
"This time i was in a school and i saw my fiance in turmoil (she's a teacher in this dream). She was fretful and in fear curled up in fetal position. As i came to her i asked what's wrong. She replied that she didn't know what He (God) wanted her to do. I told her in the Holy Ghost, He wants her to slow down. So then i asked her to come watch back to the future with me. (Remember this, it will come back at the end of the post).
So I'm reading the book and watching Cathy's video over and over again to gain clarity on all that God had me consuming. Then it got me. They mentioned the techniques used to free cathy from her mkultra programming; i.e. Neurolinguistic Programming. However this wasn't just any run of the mill NLP. They were referring to the founders and discoverer of NLP; Richard Bandler and John Grinder. Who wrote a 8 book (and longer) series on NLP:
- The structure of magic
- The structure of magic II
- Patterns of the Hypnotic techniques of Milton H. Erickson M.D. I
- Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson II
- Frogs to princes
- Trance-Formatons
- Re- framing
- Using your brain for a change
It was then that God showed me why He led me to Cathy's book.it was hidden by her and Mark in the very title of their book Trance- Formation of America. They were giving a shout out to Richard bandler and John grinder for their work on NLP which regained cathy her programed mind. NLP deprogrammed her.
At the end of reading cathy and mark's book you find out that they fell in love. Mark coupled the cryptic speech of NLP from some of the latter books to loose her mind instead of bind it.
He quoted back to the future and showed up to pick her up in a DeLorean saying " Sometimes you have to remember where you've been to find out where you're going. "
Just as I offered to watch back to the future to my fiance. I think I'm going to use this series to rescue my future wife (maybe not to Cathy's extent) from the same mkultra programming. If not at the very least I plan to learn this to rescue any and all bound up by language inhibition that the LORD allows me to help.
Now for the conclusion:
I believe the whole world has suffered from the effects of this massive undertaking of mkultra insomuch that from only reading a portion of the 1st book (structure of magic) we can see with our own eyes how we've all been robbed of clear and plain thought.
It is linked to language and grammar itself.
I won't go in depth about it now. But i wanted to leave all that read this with this:
John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Matthew 10:24-25
24The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his lord. 25It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household?
If Jesus Christ our Lord Himself was Word, then that must mean we are nothing more than language ourselves, lest we presume to be more than our Lord Himself.
Our language directly links us to how our model of the world looks like (which is individualized). And the cabal robbed us from it at every level. From schools, to military, to movies, to music. That's why Jesus came as the Word of God. Word is how our models can be expanded, challenged, defined, and changed.
NLP is nothing more than a mirror image on how Jesus Christ came to us and spoke Words coupled with His actions to convince us of His identity as Son of God.
I am going to do a post series for each book where I'm gonna give brief summaries of all the topics Richard and John discuss coupled with bible verses. It will be a while because i wish to read the whole series before i share. But i will be posting again. I want you all to know of it as intimately as i will if not more. I truly believe God wants us to use this skill. NLP inverted for evil is exactly how people are mind controlled. The way they are freed is when it's used to expand the target person you are working with's mind or even your own.
God bless you all with the Holy Spirit in Jesus name amen.
Lesson Order(Structure of Magic)
1.) https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqiD2RfT/the-structure-of-magic-i/
2.) https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqwFtE6D/structure-of-magic-i-lesson-2/
Vocabulary List https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqrjTkZz/structure-of-magic-i-vocabulary-/
I had a G&T teacher who tried to get us to avoid using the word “but” in debate. For example, instead of saying something like, “I see your point, but…” we were to replace the “but” with a period and begin a new thought. Eg: “I see your point. Have you considered…?”
He was a replacement of the lady from the year before who I liked better.
“the word "but" and how it links to distortions of the surface structure and consequently the deep structure)”
Can you explain this more? Thanks
It implies limitation for example:
I would leave town but my father is sick.
This is a surface structure
A deep structure of this is
My father is sick, (I can't/I won't) I leave town.
To challenge this you invert it:
If your father was not sick, would you leave town?
This is to expand that limitation insomuch as the book expresses and puts the responsibility of circumstance back on the person who created the structure to begin with. The dad is no longer to blame for the person refusing to leave because now they are conceding that they are choosing to stay because their father is sick as opposed to it being his fault.
The very word but implies that the person using it is feeling in some way limited by a specific thing or circumstance which they are perceiving as preventing them from the thing or action that the but claims to limit in their model.