Being naively optimistic isn't the problem, it's trashing on people who are realistic and skeptical for not seeing it the same way you do that's the problem.
By all means, have hope! That's a good thing. But your foundation for hope is shaky at best if people saying that things aren't going to go the way you hope is worth banning or trashing on.
Because when the side who is realistic and skeptical continues to be right (no justice nor consequences for these people yet, and X/Y/Z time is going to be the same) then maybe, just maybe, they're able to discern more accurately.
So far "doomers" haven't been wrong nearly as much as the copium laced hopium merchants have been, and it's absolutely copium when the same people who make all these wild datefagging predictions have to come back and say "WE CLEARLY STOPPED THEM FROM DOING WHAT THEY WERE GOING TO DO, SO DATEFAGGING HAS A PURPOSE!" etc.
So again, by all means: hope. Hope for all of this to end positively, hope things are taken care of without any blood being shed (well...you know. Good blood) and without civil war. Hope that the next court case is a resounding success that kicks off a domino reaction.
But don't leap to get rid of people who dissent against that opinion, because when you kick them out and they turn out to be right, they're not the ones who look like fools. That's all I'm saying.
Her, or anyone. It is literally impossible to hold a legitimate court hearing/case/proceeding regarding election fraud. Every single Judge in this country knows that ruling against the Deep State will cost them their lives - contrarily, their bank accounts will randomly quadruple if they rule in favor of the Deep State.
Justice is literally impossible. It would be a literal suicide mission for the judge that rules in favor of free and fair elections.
Think we can stop hoping judges are going to do a damn thing to help her.
Ah, but if you were saying that the judges would do precisely this stuff before it actually happened, you were called a
conspiracy theoristdoomer.Hope springs eternal.
I'll be naively optimistic over negative every time.
Being naively optimistic isn't the problem, it's trashing on people who are realistic and skeptical for not seeing it the same way you do that's the problem.
By all means, have hope! That's a good thing. But your foundation for hope is shaky at best if people saying that things aren't going to go the way you hope is worth banning or trashing on.
Because when the side who is realistic and skeptical continues to be right (no justice nor consequences for these people yet, and X/Y/Z time is going to be the same) then maybe, just maybe, they're able to discern more accurately.
So far "doomers" haven't been wrong nearly as much as the copium laced hopium merchants have been, and it's absolutely copium when the same people who make all these wild datefagging predictions have to come back and say "WE CLEARLY STOPPED THEM FROM DOING WHAT THEY WERE GOING TO DO, SO DATEFAGGING HAS A PURPOSE!" etc.
So again, by all means: hope. Hope for all of this to end positively, hope things are taken care of without any blood being shed (well...you know. Good blood) and without civil war. Hope that the next court case is a resounding success that kicks off a domino reaction.
But don't leap to get rid of people who dissent against that opinion, because when you kick them out and they turn out to be right, they're not the ones who look like fools. That's all I'm saying.
Her, or anyone. It is literally impossible to hold a legitimate court hearing/case/proceeding regarding election fraud. Every single Judge in this country knows that ruling against the Deep State will cost them their lives - contrarily, their bank accounts will randomly quadruple if they rule in favor of the Deep State.
Justice is literally impossible. It would be a literal suicide mission for the judge that rules in favor of free and fair elections.