interdasting. The plaintiff in this case is none other than Heather Honey. Her name ring a bell? It should. She was an expert witness for Kari Lake in the AZ fraud case. Glad to see she is looking at PA as well.
How much of this data is still preserved at this point? I find it an odd coincidence that only after two years these cases are starting to gain traction. Almost as if it's already known that the evidence has been destroyed.
I think the data gets preserved for 22 months. Some counties are saving them longer because they have gotten so many requests for the data. It is weird but government moves so slowly.
Might be. Same name - Heather Honey. In Lake's lawsuit she was described as a supply chain auditor and consultant, In the PA story she is described as an open-source investigator.
Then what? We all know fraud took place.
Yes but it needs to be established legally. We'll see where this goes. It is better than just giving up.
interdasting. The plaintiff in this case is none other than Heather Honey. Her name ring a bell? It should. She was an expert witness for Kari Lake in the AZ fraud case. Glad to see she is looking at PA as well.
I know. What a coincidink.
I found them under Wolf and Shapiro's desk.
Ha!
That is going to be a hell of a large milk carton.
How much of this data is still preserved at this point? I find it an odd coincidence that only after two years these cases are starting to gain traction. Almost as if it's already known that the evidence has been destroyed.
I think the data gets preserved for 22 months. Some counties are saving them longer because they have gotten so many requests for the data. It is weird but government moves so slowly.
Is this the same "honey" that testified in the Lake trial?
Might be. Same name - Heather Honey. In Lake's lawsuit she was described as a supply chain auditor and consultant, In the PA story she is described as an open-source investigator.