Either the Republic is Voluntary or it is forced....
If it is Voluntary, it is a True Republic, if it is Forced, it is Not a Republic, but something else....
Call it a Democracy, or anything else, but not a Republic, as it implies True Freedom to Self Govern....
IF it is a Voluntary Republic, then States have Sovereignty, and Sovereign Rights, and in those is the Right to LEAVE the Union without encumbrances....
If they Don't, then we have Feudalism under a Sovereign, and the states have nearly no Rights, as they ALL equally lost Lincolns war....
Lincoln had way better Choices, and more choices than to simply STEAL Congress's powers, and Declare War....
But he chose POORLY, and not only did he violate the U.S. Constitution, he Violated the Law of Nations, mentioned in U.S. Constitution Article I. Legislative Branch. Section VIII. Clause X. To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;
I never said he did not violate the constitution, so why are you arguing that part?
I asserted that if he did not do that the Cabal would have enslaved up much earlier. Why are you not debating that? Provide counter points, if you can.
Well, your point about Lincoln, is missing something, yes the Rothschilds planned the majority of it, yes maybe Lincoln was getting heat from the Bankers, yet again being the Rothschilds....
The split WAS planned in France about 5 years earlier, one half was to go to the Husband and the other to the Wife of two cousins who were newlyweds, maybe you knew....
But still, Lincoln did not have to STEAL the Powers from Congress, just call them to session....
As for the Cabal, well you give Lincoln way too little Credit, why would he ever go against the wishes of his superiors and Overlords??
He did exactly as ordered, and before he had a chance to Properly End the war with a formal Declaration as Commander in Chief, they had him offed....
Had he pulled the Troops out of Ft. Sumpter, and sent a stern warning to the Confederacy, he would have been assed-in a lot earlier....
He chose to obey his Masters, ignore the Banking Cabal, Murder in my estimates, about 1.8 Million Americans, and Change our Republics into a Feudalist Demonocracy....
If he had just left well enough alone, his VP would have followed orders upon seeing Lincoln get assed in, and the whole thing would've still gotten blamed on the confederacy....
So, no, it wouldn't have changed anything, Lincolns assassins were all around him, FreeMasons one and all....
I know you are very focused on all the laws Lincoln broke, but my question is simple. Whatever alternative you are arguing Lincoln could have done, would any of them have resulted in the Union being intact, or are you suggesting he should have let the country split into two?
I;m trying to point out that Each State, is a NATION unto itself, and also in relation to the other states, and especially so to the U.S. FEDERATION....
The United States in NOT, and Never has been a ""Nation"", it is a Conglomeration of Nations, like a Grouping of Companies into a Larger Corporation for Mutual Advantages....
The Founders kinda screwed up the NAME, instead of the cutesy sounding ""United States"", They really should have named it the United Nations of America, it is both much more accurate and more Bold....
Well, one of the reasons, just one of them is, They split in Two Because of the FEDERAL DEBT, and because the Northern States were demanding Special Privileges on that Debt, where the Southern States would pay the Lions Share of it....
This was a Rothschilds Banking Ploy, to intentionally break up the Union, Lincoln knew this, and he chose to fight the Split, not the Cause of it, he chose POORLY....
Is the United States a Republic or is it not??
Either the Republic is Voluntary or it is forced....
If it is Voluntary, it is a True Republic, if it is Forced, it is Not a Republic, but something else....
Call it a Democracy, or anything else, but not a Republic, as it implies True Freedom to Self Govern....
IF it is a Voluntary Republic, then States have Sovereignty, and Sovereign Rights, and in those is the Right to LEAVE the Union without encumbrances....
If they Don't, then we have Feudalism under a Sovereign, and the states have nearly no Rights, as they ALL equally lost Lincolns war....
Lincoln had way better Choices, and more choices than to simply STEAL Congress's powers, and Declare War....
But he chose POORLY, and not only did he violate the U.S. Constitution, he Violated the Law of Nations, mentioned in U.S. Constitution Article I. Legislative Branch. Section VIII. Clause X. To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;
I never said he did not violate the constitution, so why are you arguing that part?
I asserted that if he did not do that the Cabal would have enslaved up much earlier. Why are you not debating that? Provide counter points, if you can.
Well, your point about Lincoln, is missing something, yes the Rothschilds planned the majority of it, yes maybe Lincoln was getting heat from the Bankers, yet again being the Rothschilds....
The split WAS planned in France about 5 years earlier, one half was to go to the Husband and the other to the Wife of two cousins who were newlyweds, maybe you knew....
But still, Lincoln did not have to STEAL the Powers from Congress, just call them to session....
As for the Cabal, well you give Lincoln way too little Credit, why would he ever go against the wishes of his superiors and Overlords??
He did exactly as ordered, and before he had a chance to Properly End the war with a formal Declaration as Commander in Chief, they had him offed....
Had he pulled the Troops out of Ft. Sumpter, and sent a stern warning to the Confederacy, he would have been assed-in a lot earlier....
He chose to obey his Masters, ignore the Banking Cabal, Murder in my estimates, about 1.8 Million Americans, and Change our Republics into a Feudalist Demonocracy....
If he had just left well enough alone, his VP would have followed orders upon seeing Lincoln get assed in, and the whole thing would've still gotten blamed on the confederacy....
So, no, it wouldn't have changed anything, Lincolns assassins were all around him, FreeMasons one and all....
I know you are very focused on all the laws Lincoln broke, but my question is simple. Whatever alternative you are arguing Lincoln could have done, would any of them have resulted in the Union being intact, or are you suggesting he should have let the country split into two?
With or without the Southern States, the Union is always Whole....
If we were to lose 25 States today, the Union would still be Whole, smaller yes, but Whole....
So, YES, the Union would still be Whole, without the Southern States, and Yes he should have let them go...
There's much more to this, but YES to both parts....
It's a Maths Thing....
I;m trying to point out that Each State, is a NATION unto itself, and also in relation to the other states, and especially so to the U.S. FEDERATION....
The United States in NOT, and Never has been a ""Nation"", it is a Conglomeration of Nations, like a Grouping of Companies into a Larger Corporation for Mutual Advantages....
The Founders kinda screwed up the NAME, instead of the cutesy sounding ""United States"", They really should have named it the United Nations of America, it is both much more accurate and more Bold....
Well, one of the reasons, just one of them is, They split in Two Because of the FEDERAL DEBT, and because the Northern States were demanding Special Privileges on that Debt, where the Southern States would pay the Lions Share of it....
This was a Rothschilds Banking Ploy, to intentionally break up the Union, Lincoln knew this, and he chose to fight the Split, not the Cause of it, he chose POORLY....