Nullify, is a LEGAL Term that is found in LAw Dictionaries, it is used by Congress when they don;t like the effect of a specific Law or Regulation that impacts their Investments in certain Stocks.....
But was previously used to Free Americans of Bad Laws, and Bad Regulations, which did nothing to Spread Freedom and Liberty....
it is used by Congress when they don;t like the effect of a specific Law or Regulation that impacts their Investments in certain Stocks
Sure. Congress repeals laws. Write new laws. That's how the lawmaking process works. The Constitution vests all federal legislative authority in Congress and doesn't grant states any direct veto power (which you conflate as "nullification"). The idea was floated during the Constitutional Convention, to give states veto power, but it was rejected by an overwhelming majority and for good reason.
But was previously used to Free Americans of Bad Laws, and Bad Regulations, which did nothing to Spread Freedom and Liberty.
Sure. Sometimes Congress repealed bad laws. They should. That's how the system was designed to work.
"Nullify", a term you've yet to actually define, despite allusions and implications about what you think it means... that being a "constitutional right" of a what amounts to a unilateral veto power.
As I've said before, which you keep ignoring, "nullification" as a theoretical strategy, is simply states ignoring and resisting federal laws in which they believe said law is unconstitutional.
Sometimes the states are right. But not always. In 1832 SC was wrong about the tariff. In 2020 CA and others were wrong about declaring itself a "sanctuary state" for illegal immigrants, not only defying federal immigration, but obstructing the proper execution of constitutional federal immigration law.
All power relies on force, but not all power exercised is authoritatively legal.
Nullify, is a LEGAL Term that is found in LAw Dictionaries, it is used by Congress when they don;t like the effect of a specific Law or Regulation that impacts their Investments in certain Stocks.....
But was previously used to Free Americans of Bad Laws, and Bad Regulations, which did nothing to Spread Freedom and Liberty....
Sure. Congress repeals laws. Write new laws. That's how the lawmaking process works. The Constitution vests all federal legislative authority in Congress and doesn't grant states any direct veto power (which you conflate as "nullification"). The idea was floated during the Constitutional Convention, to give states veto power, but it was rejected by an overwhelming majority and for good reason.
Sure. Sometimes Congress repealed bad laws. They should. That's how the system was designed to work.
Each State, Individually, can nullify any Law made by Congress, they've been doing that....
https://www.cato.org/commentary/yes-states-can-nullify-some-federal-laws-not-all
"Nullify", a term you've yet to actually define, despite allusions and implications about what you think it means... that being a "constitutional right" of a what amounts to a unilateral veto power.
As I've said before, which you keep ignoring, "nullification" as a theoretical strategy, is simply states ignoring and resisting federal laws in which they believe said law is unconstitutional.
Sometimes the states are right. But not always. In 1832 SC was wrong about the tariff. In 2020 CA and others were wrong about declaring itself a "sanctuary state" for illegal immigrants, not only defying federal immigration, but obstructing the proper execution of constitutional federal immigration law.
All power relies on force, but not all power exercised is authoritatively legal.
The States, being the CREATORS of the Union, the Federation, the United States, are Superior to it....
Here's a PDF to help understand that Fact:: https://archive.org/details/republicofrepubl00insage/page/n7/mode/1up