Has indeed significantly influenced the development of laws, including international treaties and agreements, throughout history, and there is evidence indicating that the American Founders were away of him and influenced by him, during the creation of our Constitution.
Oh well, I'm just some dumb hick bastard trying to speak,
Never said you were. But it does seem like you're the unfortunate victim of two gaslighting efforts, from both the Lost Cause apologists and the "herr derr FeDeRaL GoV iS aLl eViL, ConStiTutiOn BaD" covert anarchists. Not a good combo.
and You are the one with the Masters degrees....
In all honesty, I learned far more about history and reality from outside of formal classes. Not saying I didn't have some outstanding profs and classmates to help increase my knowledge and develop my research and analytical skills, but the truth is that most upper level education is a racket... this, coming from somebody who spent the time and money getting the degrees and then teaching college classes.
Education is what the individual makes of it, from all types of sources, including having discussions on the internet with random anons... and for FREE to boot! 😯😉
There is nothing inherently bad about the U.S. Constitution, but I believe we may have been better under the articles of Confederation, yet, it's just a little late for that experiment, since the South was fully stopped from employing those Freedoms...
They only tried to remove themselves from the Union, not from the Creation that the Founders first set up, the Articles of Confederation....
I find that there are a few places where the Constitution could use a little upgrade, as an Improvement, but not many, and not enough to make a huge difference, but mainly just More Restrictions placed on Congress than anything else....
And when I look outwardly, I see lots of problems that do arise from the Once Hallowed Halls of the various CollAges, wherein the Perverts of the Constitution have been perverting it for ~ 60-70 Years....
And the students, were never taught things like ::
since the South was fully stopped from employing those Freedoms...
Their actual rebellion was quashed, yes. The "Yankee" consideration of rebellion 50 years prior (condemned by the southern states) over Mr. Madison's war, luckily didn't make it to requiring bullets. In multiple instances, covering all geographic sections (don't forget about the Mormons in Utah), the theoretical claim was proven wanting in legitimacy.
They only tried to remove themselves from the Union, not from the Creation that the Founders first set up, the Articles of Confederation....
They claimed they had the nonexistent constitutional right to leave the USA. Again. The Union technically dates back to 1774. But the establishment of the USA as a nation, was 1776. If they just wanted to go back to the Articles, then why was their purported constitution of their new "country" a near carbon copy of the US Constitution, albeit with the explicit recognition of slavery as being not only a legal right, but a natural right, as well as give the federal government of the so-called CSA even more power than that of the USA?
I find that there are a few places where the Constitution could use a little upgrade, as an Improvement, but not many, and not enough to make a huge difference, but mainly just More Restrictions placed on Congress than anything else....
Agreed. The rebels thought the Constitution needed to upgrade too... explicitly and forever protecting slavery.
And when I look outwardly, I see lots of problems that do arise from the Once Hallowed Halls of the various CollAges, wherein the Perverts of the Constitution have been perverting it for ~ 60-70 Years....
Yeah man. Most colleges and universities are grifts and upper level education is largely a racket. I'd not advise most people to waste the money or get into massive debt.
Has indeed significantly influenced the development of laws, including international treaties and agreements, throughout history, and there is evidence indicating that the American Founders were away of him and influenced by him, during the creation of our Constitution.
Never said you were. But it does seem like you're the unfortunate victim of two gaslighting efforts, from both the Lost Cause apologists and the "herr derr FeDeRaL GoV iS aLl eViL, ConStiTutiOn BaD" covert anarchists. Not a good combo.
In all honesty, I learned far more about history and reality from outside of formal classes. Not saying I didn't have some outstanding profs and classmates to help increase my knowledge and develop my research and analytical skills, but the truth is that most upper level education is a racket... this, coming from somebody who spent the time and money getting the degrees and then teaching college classes.
Education is what the individual makes of it, from all types of sources, including having discussions on the internet with random anons... and for FREE to boot! 😯😉
There is nothing inherently bad about the U.S. Constitution, but I believe we may have been better under the articles of Confederation, yet, it's just a little late for that experiment, since the South was fully stopped from employing those Freedoms...
They only tried to remove themselves from the Union, not from the Creation that the Founders first set up, the Articles of Confederation....
I find that there are a few places where the Constitution could use a little upgrade, as an Improvement, but not many, and not enough to make a huge difference, but mainly just More Restrictions placed on Congress than anything else....
And when I look outwardly, I see lots of problems that do arise from the Once Hallowed Halls of the various CollAges, wherein the Perverts of the Constitution have been perverting it for ~ 60-70 Years....
And the students, were never taught things like ::
https://wallbuilders.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/02/1828ElementaryCatechismConstitution.pdf
Their actual rebellion was quashed, yes. The "Yankee" consideration of rebellion 50 years prior (condemned by the southern states) over Mr. Madison's war, luckily didn't make it to requiring bullets. In multiple instances, covering all geographic sections (don't forget about the Mormons in Utah), the theoretical claim was proven wanting in legitimacy.
They claimed they had the nonexistent constitutional right to leave the USA. Again. The Union technically dates back to 1774. But the establishment of the USA as a nation, was 1776. If they just wanted to go back to the Articles, then why was their purported constitution of their new "country" a near carbon copy of the US Constitution, albeit with the explicit recognition of slavery as being not only a legal right, but a natural right, as well as give the federal government of the so-called CSA even more power than that of the USA?
Agreed. The rebels thought the Constitution needed to upgrade too... explicitly and forever protecting slavery.
Yeah man. Most colleges and universities are grifts and upper level education is largely a racket. I'd not advise most people to waste the money or get into massive debt.