🤔⚖️🏛 The Truth About the Brunson Case 🤔⚖️🏛
(www.uncoverdc.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (87)
sorted by:
I agree with your assessment of this case...Also, the Brunson Case INVOLVES NATIONAL SECURITY..The above link to the URL AND READING it does NOT cover the National Security issue and ALSO the Solicitor General NOT going to INTERFERE or STOP any proceeding(s). She SIGNED AWAY her right to REPRESENT THE GOVERNMENT...
NOTE: I do wish people would look at things in light of what has taken place with the Brunson Case...The court PUTTING the case on the docket means they, SCJs will DISCUSS the merits...AND ALSO THE RAMIFICATIONS...
IF THE CASE MOVES FORWARD, IT WILL BE UP TO THE US MARSHALS SERVICE AND THE MILITARY...The REASON: to keep people from howling at the moon when their congcritters are lead away...AND ELECTIONS ARE RE-DONE!!!!
President Trump said on the night leaving the SCIF: "WE CAUGHT THEM ALL, WE'LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS."!!!
This is a 'petition for a writ of certiorari' scheduled for a conference on Jan. 06. No one knows if it will be even heard less require the votes to proceed and schedule for oral arguments. In the article it states only 20-25% of the petitions distributed for a given conference are actually discussed”. The other 75-80% of petitions are denied and discarded—likely without the justices ever reading them or even being aware they exist.
I hope the Brunson petition is indeed considered and survives conference.
Ok…with all due respect here…where the hell did you come up with this? Did every Brunson case cheerleader here fail civics? Every single case that pays the filing fee and submits all required paperwork “gets on the docket.” That is not remarkable. Nor does SCOTUS “hear the merits” of any case. That is simply not true either.
How does one file an appeal of a federal case? Can you just file an appeal because you didn’t like the outcome? No. You need a reason to appeal. What error(s) did the court make in your case? In Brunson’s case, they never got to any of the merits. Was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What is on appeal is whether any of the causes of action stated in the initial complaint have federal court subject matter jurisdiction. IF they actually wasted their time hearing this case, that is the ONLY issue they would look at. Merits are irrelevant to why they are before this court.
No. Government waived their right to respond to the petition for certiorari. Nobody is going to waste time replying to a bullshit lawsuit with no merit. That is a waste of valuable lawyer work. This case speaks for itself…its bs. It will get dismissed without needing the government to explain why it should be.
"SIGNED AWAY" is used as a SYNONYM for "HAS WAIVED"!!!
Happy New Year!!!!!!!😎😎😎😎😎
Except you take it a bridge too far. Waiving a right to respond to a writ is not the same as declining to represent the government. It is simply declining to respond to the petition. That person is still attorney of record for the government. You can bet if this magically gets out of conference with 4 votes, there will be someone from the DOJ representing the government.
So you’re saying there’s a chance it makes it out of conference.