Brunsons' response pic 2
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
This is an incredibly well-written response to whatever it is that Adam and Terry wrote, which I have not seen. Anybody who chooses to think for themselves should be offended at a title like they used so I probably wouldn't have read their article anyway. I have high hopes for this case and I think any American Patriot should.
Here's the GAW post of the article.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqPbRnN9/-the-truth-about-the-brunson-cas/
Felt like a shill hit piece... goes something like this:
We are not dooming
We are not black pilling
Were only giving you the TRUTH
Sounds sus AF.
Ill wait to see what happens.
Shows how well researched the Brunsons are.
and good Trumpet players
Trump-et you say? kek.
Ah - good!
There is hope. After all, Roe VS Wade was overturned and I never expected that to happen by legal ruling. I expected advances in technology, ULTRASOUND and being able to see images of embryos throughout stages of growth to change people's minds.
I hope we come to a place that ultrasound isn't necessary to change people's minds.
I agree but a picture is worth a thousand words. Images show developing babies are human, fragile and deserve protection. It saddens me that anyone can ignore the fact that these are babies after seeing the evidence.
I cannot argue with you but I feel like I would rather not need that. Not sure if ultrasound does anything to the developing child, ya see. Ultrasound can apparently be used to destroy cells, even cancer cells. Who knows what that does to a child in gestation.
I understand. My point is when Roe V Wade was passed, technology was not advanced so most people did not really know, believe, realize that the growing bump hidden in an expanding abdomen was a baby, not just an enlarging clump of cells.
They didn't need technology to know and believe that, it was written. Then it was written that it wasn't anything great and even with the pictures people didn't care.
Not getting my hopes up. I will wait and see.
SCOTOS
Yes, not the only grammatical error. Final sentence, "which is act of treason". Missing [an].
Edit: Also "this this" in pic 1.
and also in the last paragraph uses 'form" when it should be "from"
I believe the judiciary is far too corrupt to care if oaths are broken.
But on the bright this is getting a lot of attention from the public...
Epecially the letter writing campaign. I sent one to SCOTUS and one to the Brunsons.
I saw a response on Revolver to the Writ, and it danced around a lot. Go to revolver.news to find it and its gone.
There was another response with Robert Barnes.
Where are these articles now ?
aww... I missed the comment.
My comment stands and will stand. Thinking SCOTUS is any sort of remedy is hilarity at its finest.
did you delete it?
I didn't delete anything. You're showing divison, read the sidebar.
Well someone is.
Not sure what u are talking about.