Correct. The suit was brought against the wrong people, and for the wrong reasons, legally speaking. Though the general gist, e.g. that several elections were fraudulent, is valid and that case should be heard in court, the way this case has been presented, will 99.9% end up being rejected.
Miracles are always possible, but a wise man wouldn't expect this to do anything.
the suit has nothing to do with election fraud persay but instead congressman taking it upon themselves to disregard rules laid down according to the constitution for elections...not only should the SC take it..it should be a 9-0 vote
The Constitution? Pray tell, where in the Constitution, specifically, is Congress delegated the authority or responsibility to adjudicate election disputes?
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
No mention of any authority given to Congress, rather quite the opposite in the recognition that the people retain certain rights not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution.
So I'll ask again, where in the Constitution, including Amendments which are indeed part of the Constitution, specifically, is Congress delegated the authority or responsibility to adjudicate election disputes?
Correct. The suit was brought against the wrong people, and for the wrong reasons, legally speaking. Though the general gist, e.g. that several elections were fraudulent, is valid and that case should be heard in court, the way this case has been presented, will 99.9% end up being rejected.
Miracles are always possible, but a wise man wouldn't expect this to do anything.
the suit has nothing to do with election fraud persay but instead congressman taking it upon themselves to disregard rules laid down according to the constitution for elections...not only should the SC take it..it should be a 9-0 vote
The Constitution? Pray tell, where in the Constitution, specifically, is Congress delegated the authority or responsibility to adjudicate election disputes?
a constitutional amendment becomes part of the constitution after it is ratified...ninth amendment
No mention of any authority given to Congress, rather quite the opposite in the recognition that the people retain certain rights not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution.
So I'll ask again, where in the Constitution, including Amendments which are indeed part of the Constitution, specifically, is Congress delegated the authority or responsibility to adjudicate election disputes?