This is sadly going to be dead on arrival. It won't even be heard in conference. It will be summarily thrown out before ever reaching the ears of the Justices, by their assistant Para legals.
Can you imagine SCOTUS Justices, the Judicial branch being able to remove members of the legislative branch? It would inevitably be used against us, they would have thrown Trump out for starters. I don't know if this is even in their power to do.
Yes. I read another post about this a couple days ago. As they said, if SCOTUS as the court of original jurisdiction wouldn't hear Texas V Pennsylvania and 20 other states, they sure won't consider this one.
Correct. The suit was brought against the wrong people, and for the wrong reasons, legally speaking. Though the general gist, e.g. that several elections were fraudulent, is valid and that case should be heard in court, the way this case has been presented, will 99.9% end up being rejected.
Miracles are always possible, but a wise man wouldn't expect this to do anything.
the suit has nothing to do with election fraud persay but instead congressman taking it upon themselves to disregard rules laid down according to the constitution for elections...not only should the SC take it..it should be a 9-0 vote
The Constitution? Pray tell, where in the Constitution, specifically, is Congress delegated the authority or responsibility to adjudicate election disputes?
This is sadly going to be dead on arrival. It won't even be heard in conference. It will be summarily thrown out before ever reaching the ears of the Justices, by their assistant Para legals.
Can you imagine SCOTUS Justices, the Judicial branch being able to remove members of the legislative branch? It would inevitably be used against us, they would have thrown Trump out for starters. I don't know if this is even in their power to do.
Yes. I read another post about this a couple days ago. As they said, if SCOTUS as the court of original jurisdiction wouldn't hear Texas V Pennsylvania and 20 other states, they sure won't consider this one.
You’re right. And you are being downvoted by people who know you’re right but are pissed off by that reality.
Correct. The suit was brought against the wrong people, and for the wrong reasons, legally speaking. Though the general gist, e.g. that several elections were fraudulent, is valid and that case should be heard in court, the way this case has been presented, will 99.9% end up being rejected.
Miracles are always possible, but a wise man wouldn't expect this to do anything.
the suit has nothing to do with election fraud persay but instead congressman taking it upon themselves to disregard rules laid down according to the constitution for elections...not only should the SC take it..it should be a 9-0 vote
The Constitution? Pray tell, where in the Constitution, specifically, is Congress delegated the authority or responsibility to adjudicate election disputes?
a constitutional amendment becomes part of the constitution after it is ratified...ninth amendment