They do have to be verifiable, just like polls, they can be taken from non representative groups or even made up entirely. The amount of similar evidence that has been completely fabricated and used against us for decades makes it have a bad odor IMO. These things require citations and then verification, most people don't remember both of those parts, they just remember the part they use in their rhetoric.
Not often. But I do recall hearing of some cases typically related to some congenital defect that went undetected.
I don't disagree with you. I would just like to see more direct evidence that the vax caused this before reaching a conclusion.
Agreed. But you can never get direct evidence unless you investigate. And you'll never investigate unless you propose a link.
Unlike Fauci, this is science.
Statistics ARE evidence....
They do have to be verifiable, just like polls, they can be taken from non representative groups or even made up entirely. The amount of similar evidence that has been completely fabricated and used against us for decades makes it have a bad odor IMO. These things require citations and then verification, most people don't remember both of those parts, they just remember the part they use in their rhetoric.
Statistics only apply to a theoretical world, not the real one.