Jordan is very good at presenting an argument in a way that is hard to refute. He also seems to have the skill of not letting his ego get in the way of his message. Too many politicians are so busy trying to feed their egos that people tune them out.
I agree, Jordan might be much more effective leading the Judiciary Committee where he can shred the DS in a way no other Republican can.
He has said himself HE DOES NOT WANT IT! He’s after the Judiciary Chair. I’d rather see that bulldog there.
Jordan is very good at presenting an argument in a way that is hard to refute. He also seems to have the skill of not letting his ego get in the way of his message. Too many politicians are so busy trying to feed their egos that people tune them out.
I agree, Jordan might be much more effective leading the Judiciary Committee where he can shred the DS in a way no other Republican can.
I don't know anything about what kind of person would be best for the Judiciary Committee.
But I would love Jordan as Speaker. He's good at getting the word out. Making people listen.
He will be WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT HIM TO BE
Why can't he do both?
I don't believe it's possible to hold both positions by rule.
Good point... Speaker needs to be someone with a silver tongue....