New FOIA docs related to C19 origins. Forget speaker drama and start digging in !
(twitter.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
It's a theory that doesn't fit the evidence. C19 was created in a lab and does exist. However, like all caronaviruses, it mutates quickly to target spread rather than severe symptoms. It failed to remain deadly but did open the door as an excuse for control and mandates. Its response has been like a soccer player feigning severe injury, a fake reaction in order to further the goals of the great reset crowd. That theory fits the evidence.
There was no need to the virus because everyone including you fell for the propaganda. Your way means they were right to use emergency powers at first. But they weren’t. Your way leaves it open to happen again for some crisis or another. Mine doesn’t.
Wait... How does the existence of a virus justify using emergency powers? Those are completely different issues.
It was all hegellian dialectic bro. There was no virus. They created a problem with their propaganda then presented a solution. And since covid madness ended, freemason judges across the entire West have been quietly solidifying the legal basis for these powers. When it finally appears before the supreme court, they’ll be faced with a unanimous wall of lower court judges who ruled it was justified and agree with them.
If the cabal was justified in using the emergency powers in the first place because China released a deadly but short lasting virus, then the door remains open for further uses of those powers for further ostensibly real crises. The emergency powers must be repealed entirely, and then the lies used to justify their use must be revealed as fraudulent ab initio, and must resonate through history as an example of what happens when we give any government these powers.
The only way to stop it happening again is to reveal the covid lie for fraud. Then the emergency powers were never justified and we’ll gather public support for repealing them entirely.
The use of the hegelian dialectic to promote social reaction in no way means that the evidence used in the hegelian dialectic was false. In other words, just because this technique was used is in no way an argument against the existence of the SARS virus. You are here, imo, seeing real evidence and using it to come to an unrelated conclusion.
My investigations into these manipulations, both in the past and present has so far always led to real evidence (by real I mean supported and corroborated by all other evidence). This "real" evidence is used to support the steps in the dialectic as it moves forward through the social manipulation. Propaganda is almost always true as well (using the same criteria for "true" as for "real" previously). It is just never the whole truth. Because the whole truth is not ever used, the conclusions used from the "true" statements in the propaganda and/or dialectic are false. In other words, the falseness comes not from what is included, but from what is left out. From this the conclusions that we come to from insufficient data are also false.
For example, the number of reported covid deaths is a real piece of evidence. The number of actual covid deaths is almost certainly much less. What is left out is all the evidence of misdiagnosis. The lie is in not including how diagnosis of covid is determined. It is not including the "with" covid v. "from" covid data. Etc.
I sort of agree, but it doesn't have to rely on the virus not existing. All that is necessary is to show the actual lies of omission.
The only REAL way to stop it from happening again has nothing to do with what the courts decide. You are giving all power to the courts and not recognizing where the real power lies. That is exactly what the Cabal wants you to do. That is the fraud. The real power lies with We The People. It is in the court of "public opinion" that it must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. It is We The People that must realize how easy it is to lie by omission. That is all that is required to solve this problem, and I assert the only way it can solve it "forever."