Why does GAW rule? Because fuckwit doomtards are *yoinked* to the sidelines where they belong. Pick any thread and fill your lungs with the pure, clean air of not having these losers stink everything up with their low-info, low-effort garbage. We love the smell of GAW in the mornings! ❤️, your mods!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🌎 WWG1WGAWW 🌍
Typical PW thread, me, reading, hoping for a nugget of analysis from someone, and as usual, it turns out to be a TOTAL WASTE OF TIME (and, I swear, I could have posted a screenshot from that one thread that was triple the size of this one). Then it makes me thankful (and maybe a bit emotional) that we have this wonderful and very, very special community.
There's a reason that Rolling Stone picked GAW as the target of their latest hit piece instead of Patriots.WIN, and this, right here, above, is the main reason why. GAW RULES NOT BECAUSE OF THE MODS, BUT BECAUSE THE MODS MADE ROOM FOR YOU GUYS. We work for you. And, collectively, you are our bosses. Our job is to keep the plebs, losers, fuckwits, and assholes out of YOUR way so that we can move our movement forward together.
Our sincere thanks to each and every one of you high-effort, high-info, high-minded and always positive-as-you-can-be rat bastards out there who just won't quit, who never give up, and who, every day, moves us forward. Your smarts, your analysis, your research, your digging, your best efforts will never be far from getting a sticky around here (un1like PW). YOU are the reason that the ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE decided to train their guns on GAW, instead of somewhere else. It's an honoUr to serve next to each and every one of you.
Thanks for everything.
Free speech at it's finest.
The concept of 'free speech' first implies that the speaker legitimately has something impactful to say.
Where did you get that from? Free speech allows for one to speak freely regardless of the words. Anyone has the right to any opinion and the right to voice that opinion regardless of correctness or validity. Moreso regardless of feelings. Inhibiting this right in any way is to limit one's concept of free will and allows one to form opinions based solely through the beliefs of those limiting that speech.
This isn't my house, so I don't call the shots. The right to limit free speech here is in the hands of those selected, and I assume instructed, to limit it. I understand that, I just didn't realize that it was limited to the degree that it was unacceptable to point out that it is limited. Slippery slope. Lesson learned.
Sidebar is where I am getting it from. We have standards. Not talking about free speech, nor am I getting this definition from anywhere excerpt the menu of higher standards that are applied from a "Vox Populi, Vox Deu" mandate. Call me an asshole, OK, fine, but that's the ultimate law around here. We strive ruled by you guys, at least, those determined to move our movement forward. The rest? Get moved to the sidelines where they belong.
wwg1wga
FLAIR
Don't know how you do it cats!
It is sad. The original TheDonald was a force to be reckoned with, full of power and might. Now? A sad sorry former shell of its former self and a laughing stock. That is why doomers must be expelled with NO exceptions.
It's because they basically stopped meming and stickying quality shitposts.