Brunson - CERTIORARI DENIED
SEE TOP COMMENT!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010923zor_p860.pdf
Page 5
22-380 BRUNSON, RALAND J. V. ADAMS, ALMA S., ET AL.
By the rejection of this case, doesn't that mean that the Supreme Court is aiding and abetting treasonous behavior? Shouldn't they be taken out?
I mean...sure...if you think they should have heard the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim that Brunson made...
Just FYI, Brunson made zero claims of treason or election fraud. But he sure filled up the preceding pages with it. Then he tried to throw 6 bogus tort claims as his basis for relief from all of this. Which is why he got tossed in district court, affirmed on appeal, and denied by SCOTUS.
You’re wrong. He certainly made the claim about treason.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.126764/gov.uscourts.utd.126764.6.1.pdf
Claims:
I. Promissory Estoppel - (p.15)
II. Promissory Estoppel - (p.17)
III. Breach of duty - (p. 18)
IV. Intentional infliction of emotional distress - (p.19)
V. Fraud - (p. 20)
VI. Civil conspiracy - (p.23)
Those are all tort claims. None of them are constitutional. None of them are "treason."
Notice that this case is such a sacred cow, even citing their own claims for relief and pointing out how none of them are "treason" results in a downvote tantrum. This is truly remarkable.
They all add up t treason.
yea and not it will be up to the military because all options are dead but who the fuck knows what is really going on.