Brunson - CERTIORARI DENIED
SEE TOP COMMENT!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010923zor_p860.pdf
Page 5
22-380 BRUNSON, RALAND J. V. ADAMS, ALMA S., ET AL.
They all add up t treason.
Is the Supreme Court supposed to act as their lawyer in completely reforming/rewriting their claims to some legally sufficient level? No. They are the dumbasses that decided to write this themselves. They sure exacted enough money from people duped into sending some to them that they could afford to get a real lawyer to try and put something viable into this diatribe. But they didn't. When your claim fails, it fails.
https://youtu.be/C3xM8sHGoiQ
Court can't rule on arguments not made. Have to make the right arguments. Even if the underlying claim is valid (election manipulation and fraud), Brunson failed to make the right arguments to support said claim.
Courts are corrupt or did you not get the memo?
I'm not trying to be disrespectful. I'm trying to tell you that you could take this case before Jesus Christ and you would lose. It has no merit. This is nothing more than a generalized grievance that we all have about the 2020 election. Slapping some treason and "aid and comfort" buzzwords onto a shit sandwich worth of tort claims doesn't change that the claims are a shit sandwich. They are grifting off people's righteous indignation about 2020 fraud. Nothing more.
BS. All one has to do is read it get what is alleged.
Yep and still are.
Yup. It's amazing that "Follow the money" is rarely applied to anyone other than libs.