Brunson - CERTIORARI DENIED - The Great Awakening

234

Brunson - CERTIORARI DENIED SEE TOP COMMENT!

posted 1 year ago by DRan 1 year ago by DRan +234 / -0

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010923zor_p860.pdf

Page 5

22-380 BRUNSON, RALAND J. V. ADAMS, ALMA S., ET AL.

193 comments

193 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (193)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– inspoken 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Fren, I have a few question since you seem to know.

Is there any way to see how each justice voted on this?
a) if we can't know, would it be possible for the military to know (in case this case was a way to see which justices were not compromised)
if it was denied how much of a chance do you think the reconsideration would have?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Madrashro 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Not really. The conferences are completely confidential. We know that at least 6 Justices voted to not hear the case. A judge can publicly dissent from the Courts decision not to grant certiorari, which didn’t happen here. It’s almost certainly unanimous by the whole court.

A. No mechanism that I know of. There would likely be major Constitutional issues with this.

Almost zero chance. Asking the Justices who just denied to hear the case for the exact same thing is not usually a receipt for success.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– inspoken 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Thank you fren, TY very much! I prefer the hard truth to more delusions of hope. So would you say that it seems like there is no judicial way forward at this point?

Trump, Musk & Gen Flynn all seem to imply something is up soon. Do you think that's the ol' "military is the only way" Would you say that's the only way at this point?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Madrashro 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

There is no judicial way forward with this case, at least (and they’re likely never was).

Not sure about the military, either, but that’s not my area of expertise.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q