Brunson ruled against?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
The case never sought to overturn the election. It was a case, to which many politicians broke the law and broke their oath of office.
SCOTUS apparently recognizes we no longer have a Constitution (it's been suspended?) and we are living under some other form of government.
Thank you for that lightbulb moment!
Other people need to figure this out too. Are you being facetious here?
No, I'm not being facetious at all, I'm just not as quick on the uptake as you and I hadn't considered that the legal environment the SC operates in might be altered due to devolution. You're usually quite a lot ahead of me fren!
That's all good. Carry on. Know that not everyone is aware of devolution though. You do win my Fine Fickle Finger Friend award though. Cherish it as I have. 😊😊😊
Now you've given me and other frens something to ponder! I hadn't really thought of this scenerio involving devolution.... Nice food for thought! UPDOOT
proxy government of china perhaps?