Nothing was clearly provided in the denial except denied more on technicality like the rest instead of actually being “heard”. It’s totally common, and unless the whole Nation makes a mass stink about it, then it may be appealed many times.
I wasn't clear on if any reason or details were provided about why they turned it down.
I really think getting over the hurdle of STANDING was a bigger deal than we realize; if the public support continues to get stronger for this case, even if they appeal it into oblivion I would GUESS that before too long someone will get a case on the same topic up to them.
Brunson kind of gave us a target and outline even if it isn't the one that makes it to SCOTUS... and as you say, if the massive public interest and support only continues on for it, they will start getting A BUNCH of cases that are very similar to Brunson even if they won't take this one, and they will feel the pressure to look into it until they do.
It's kind of like the 'get woke-go broke' trend only applied to SCOTUS. Our folks are great at keeping the heat cranked up. 🤣
I really think getting over the hurdle of STANDING was a bigger deal than we realize
Correct. Brunson doesn't have standing because he didn't have any constitutional right denied.
The Electors and to an extent candidate Trump, however, did have their constitutional rights denied. These are the parties that have standing.
To win the game, you have to play the game, not try to circumvent the rules of the game. All the money floating around funding so much Paytriot bullshit, and yet from what I can tell, not a single case filed in support of the Electors to be pushed up the chain as should have been done. Why?
And as much as I wanted to believe the Brunson guys just didn't know better... the Barnes clip kind of convinced me....
I mean at the stage you're taking this puppy to SCOTUS.... and STILL going as pro se litigants?
...why have you not at least mentioned or courted SOME KIND of LEGAL REP?? Especially with the publicity you're getting...
If anything, maybe this is a marker to show us the direction we need to take in order to get something filed and moving that is correctly done in the legal sense. We learn more in defeat and all that, y'know...
I wasn't clear on if any reason or details were provided about why they turned it down.
I really think getting over the hurdle of STANDING was a bigger deal than we realize; if the public support continues to get stronger for this case, even if they appeal it into oblivion I would GUESS that before too long someone will get a case on the same topic up to them.
Brunson kind of gave us a target and outline even if it isn't the one that makes it to SCOTUS... and as you say, if the massive public interest and support only continues on for it, they will start getting A BUNCH of cases that are very similar to Brunson even if they won't take this one, and they will feel the pressure to look into it until they do.
It's kind of like the 'get woke-go broke' trend only applied to SCOTUS. Our folks are great at keeping the heat cranked up. 🤣
Yes haha! Yes we all are. WWG1WGA
Correct. Brunson doesn't have standing because he didn't have any constitutional right denied.
The Electors and to an extent candidate Trump, however, did have their constitutional rights denied. These are the parties that have standing.
To win the game, you have to play the game, not try to circumvent the rules of the game. All the money floating around funding so much Paytriot bullshit, and yet from what I can tell, not a single case filed in support of the Electors to be pushed up the chain as should have been done. Why?
Yep, you're over the target.
And as much as I wanted to believe the Brunson guys just didn't know better... the Barnes clip kind of convinced me....
I mean at the stage you're taking this puppy to SCOTUS.... and STILL going as pro se litigants? ...why have you not at least mentioned or courted SOME KIND of LEGAL REP?? Especially with the publicity you're getting...
If anything, maybe this is a marker to show us the direction we need to take in order to get something filed and moving that is correctly done in the legal sense. We learn more in defeat and all that, y'know...