4 rockets on launch pads at the same time for 4 booms? Posts at 1:30 and 1:36 are pretty interesting to read. Links in comments.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 B- B- B- B O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Wait. If humans havent been to space and everything gathered on space is a deep fake how could you propose space is a vacuum. That would require data and confirmation of status and physic properties in order to deduce a near vacuum environment exists outside the atmosphere. Oh is the atmosphere real too? Or that is also a deep fake?
You're using fallacious reasoning here. I never said it was deep fake, you have been trying to push that argument on me as though I was making that argument. This is reddit-tier thinking.
I notice you're also dodging the question.
Are you suggesting that space is anything other than a rounding error from a true vacuum, as stated in any scientific book on the subject?
I didnt suggest anything. I've been brainwashed since kindergarten and a reddit tier smooth brain. I'm asking the really smart, knowledgeable Twitter tier people questions. So I can learn.
But since it was stated space travel requires other technology yet space is being presented as a conditional value status of a vacuum. The next glaring question is how did this proposition become a presented status in the discussion. How was space determined to be a near vacuum state?
STFU you didn't suggest anything... do you need me to list the inferences you've made so far?
Or better, can you answer the questions since you're now onto the insult phase?
You know you have a strong argument when your first resort was a fallacy and your second reaction was insults.
Ok so no real answer for how it is concluded space is a near vacuum but humans have not been there. No problem. Didnt expect an answer anyway, your types can be spotted light years away. Hypothetically speaking since space travel can't exist of coarse, therefore light years is a fictional inference.
The irony here of accusing insults is incredibly comical though.
I'll STFU now and go to reddit, that I've never used, for weak fallacies. The sequier talking points of supposition presented have no bearing to maintain my interest.
Jumps in straight with insults, clearly you're so smart that you missed the part where I said "a rounding error away from a true vacuum".
5 atoms per cm^3 appears to be roughly the consensus.