For Veterans of this fight we know that this is attempt #5 of stopping the cabal in the US. However, this time (current op) we have the upper hand. Trump becoming POTUS for 4 years is proof of that. That never should have happened with the cabal appearing to control EVERYTHING since 2004. The existence of worldwide allies (setup by Trump) all working together against the cabal makes this time different.
Historical reference to the other 4 Awakenings/Cabal Takedown operations
- 1968-1976 (8 years); Started with Nixon win in 1968, Ended by contrived Watergate and forced resignation, attempted assassination of Ford, and rigged election 1976 by Soviet infiltrators to place Soviet agents Carter/Mondale into White House. See parallels to 1976-1981 here: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvUQJhdG/move-and-countermove-19731986-in/; Note a key White Hat "event" with the death of Lyndon Johnson in January 1973 a couple days after Nixon inauguration (it likely was an execution for his role in JFK).
-
1980-1985 (5 years); Started with Reagan election, ended with GW Bush/CIA takeover July 14, 1985 and mass amnesty and importation of illegals/communists to change the demographics ahead of planned end of Soviet Union (too much damage done by Reagan to SU for cabal to recover so they imploded it and pivoted to European Union as successor). Reagan to Bush power transfer: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvGQtCI2/george-hw-bush-was-made-presiden/c/; One could argue that this one went until 1987 when a cabal-engineered market crash (under direction of GHW Bush/CIA) wiped out most of Patriot assets in retaliation for BCCI takedown. Also, some clear White Hat activity with the death of Nelson Rockefeller in 1979.
-Prince was clearly part of this Mini-Awakening on the music/media/entertainment front and 'Purple Rain' was likely a reference to exactly that: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqiGQo5B/purple-rain--a-great-awakening-a/c/
-
1994-2001 (7 years); Started with Republican takeover of the House, attempted takedown of Clinton/CIA crime families, forced implosion of Gore/Green1/Enron carbon trading scheme; ended with 9-11 false flag and national bankruptcy (and re-collateralization of national debt). History of US collateralization: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCbSJWq/a-brief-history-of-united-states/
-Some details on what was going on with IBM, AT&T, MSFT, and GOOG as they were all successively deployed as Deep State weapons against Americans: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvL9na6D/finkle-is-einhorn-google-is-micr/
- 2008-2013 (5 years); Started with crashing of cabal financial system, destruction of cabal banks, Tea Party, Occupy Wall Street, and Anonymous movements; ended with Obama rigged election, unleashing of propaganda, and Obama purge of military and his mass murder campaign against conservatives using MS-13 operatives. Also note targeting of conservatives, churches, etc. with full weaponization of IRS against Patriots. This one may have started in 2007 as lots of weird stuff started happening publicly in Spring of 2007.
-
2016-now (in year 7); Started with election of President Trump, ending with restoration of our national AND state Sovereignty, control of our money and labor, and a Worldwide Great Awakening to counter the UN/WEF Agenda 2030 Great Reset and Depopulation initiatives.
-The setup for this current operation appears to have started immediately after some triggering event in late 2012 or early 2013. Something happened to the real Joe Biden around this time period. It is possible that Obama got flipped, replaced, or controlled at some point in 2014 or 2015. Something happened to the real Hillary Clinton in late 2016 that prevented her from running again in 2020 as was expected. Several additional markers during the 2013-2016 timeframe look like counter-infiltration bread crumbs and setting up for the Trump victory in 2016.
-Patriots were recording all cabal operative activities (probably through Motorola and Blackberry devices) since 2008. It is unclear if Obama was able to delete all copies of this data prior to 2013. Both companies later broken up/destroyed by the Deep State for their anti-cabal operations.
If you look closely you can see elements of these previous operations in the current operation. Here are 5 examples:
A. 2017-present Crowdsource intelligence analysis and data gathering appears to be built on top of the groundbreaking work of the Anonymous and Wikileaks organizations of the 2008-13 era. In the form of patriots.win and greatawakening.win it has been coupled with a "social media" type interface to allow more efficient and user-friendly interaction while still allowing offline archiving and storage of information. This "cabal intelligence network neutralizer" was the last key piece needed for success, imo.
B. 2021 Music being used as a weapon to help wake up the normies similar to Prince and others 1981-1985. Such as this with 1980s era frequencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s37x2VSZrLw
C. 2022-23 Very public side effects of forced vaccination creating vaccine hesitancy/caution that leads to eventual suspension of weaponized vaccines such as occurred in March 1977 with the Swine Flu vaccine suspension: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219595/
D. 2023 House of Rep. control similar to "Contract with America" that went into effect in 1995 after big engineered Red Wave in 1994 mid-terms (note that it was a hidden Red Wave this time to justify replacement/control of Republican leadership.); Timing of MAGA Senate control might be deciphered by looking at 1994-2000 time period. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_with_America
E. 2024 or 2028 Election of MAGA President Trump with a landslide victory such as Reagan in 1980 or Nixon in 1972; 2024 might look like 1924 or 1824 (Andrew Jackson) with Electoral College split 3 or 4 ways. It appears that elections may be legit in at least 27 states by 2024 election, but may take until 2028 to get fixed in 48 states. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1824_United_States_presidential_election
God wins, always!
Note that there appear to be other major operations against the cabal, especially during WW1 and WW2, but it appears that JFK setup the Q organization (with help from Eisenhower?) to permanently monitor and counter all cabal activities in the US. So prior to JFK they may not have been called "Q Operations".
'Q' is military intel as in "What's the Q, today?", says a military commander to his scouts in the daily battlefield briefing; with likely origins pre-Revolutionary War military lingo.
I am not discounting anything. I am taking what I am reading and saying it was two different speeches. One I think to tell a secret, most likely for future generations, and one to cater to the Cabal, i.e. the original speech. That is my assessment. No where in that assessment am I discounting anything at all. I am however recognizing that the bulk of the speech, and more specifically the conclusions of the speech are exactly as I stated. You are suggesting there was a hidden message. So am I. But I recognize that within the context of what would be seen by pretty much every person who heard him give it, they would not have come to the conclusion about that speech that you did, but rather would have come to the conclusion that I did, i.e. that he was speaking about the USSR. Ignoring that is, I suggest, you discounting the context of the speech, which always leads to false conclusions and analyses.
As for the rest, I think you are missing so much evidence. I am going to give some statements without any evidence to support it. I've written a couple thousand pages on this in my report, but it is somewhat jumbled, and finding all the evidence to support it would take a lot of time. It will be coming out eventually, but for now I hope you listen, though I do not expect you (nor do I want you to) believe me.
There is absolutely a singular goal. It is as I have described. I suggest you read the protocols of the elders of Zion and look into the efforts of the zionists to create Israel, starting in the early 1800s (yes, it goes back at least that far). It will elucidate the "singular" goal a great deal. Of interest, the protocols were "debunked" by Allen Dulles. That's important for what I'm about to say. What he had to say about it is also important, but outside of the scope of what I'm saying right now.
I also agree there seems to be sub factions and sub goals. I think there are faction wars. The singular goal however is clear, and every effort always works towards it. Your idea of "humanist" and "anti-humanist" is not The Cabal. The Cabal is a group of people who call themselves Jews (and their underlings who call themselves whatever they want). Are there people who are among the elite who are "humanists?" Perhaps. I'd even go so far as to say "likely." However, they are not the Cabal. This may be a point of semantics, but it is an important distinction. They are not "the factions." If there are people who care about people within the larger group of The Cabal, they are not a clear faction. I do not think such a group could possibly survive. As far as I can tell, there is no "Faction war" that goes against the greater efforts of the Cabal as laid out in the Protocols (not counting perhaps the efforts of JFK and the present day). The Q effort is not a clear faction, but is perhaps a group within the Cabal that acts in hiding (or at least they were in hiding). I.e. they are a clandestine group, acting within a clandestine group, that acts within a secret society (if that is indeed what they are, and not controlled opposition).
The OSS in its origin was designed to help control the war. They worked with the Nazis the entire time. Allen Dulles, one of the biggest people within both the OSS and the CIA was meeting with Hitler at the beginning of his "rule" (he was never actually in charge of shit) and was there for the "surrender" of the Nazis. Then he took the Nazis and put them in various places. He created the CIA with the Nazis, and sent some to the KGB, and sent some to DARPA, and NASA, and the Soviet equivalent, and various other countries (including MI6, MOSSAD and Saudi Arabia). The Nazis never lost the war, on the contrary, they took over the world. Of course they didn't really take over the world, because the world was controlled by Rockefeller, Rothschild, etc. both before and after, but they of course were the Nazis, and all their agents who called themselves Nazis became all the other organizations mentioned.
Thinking that they were "purely an entity to enforce banker interests" has nothing to do with reality. They were always a propaganda agency. The world is controlled through propaganda. They were Goebbels agency, working in every country, all over the world. "Banking interests" are meaningless compared to the real scope of their control. Or rather, I agree completely, I just don't think you appreciate the real scope of "Banking interests."
This also has nothing to do with reality.
I'm just going to call "The Cabal", or more specifically, Rockefeller, Rothschild, and other acting agents of the Cabal who control most of the system (at least on the surface), "The Trust" for convenience.
The Trust created WWI. They created the USSR. They created WWII. They created the Nazis. They owned the entirety of the American government since at least the Civil War and they created the American response to all of those things. They created the CIA purely as an extension of the Nazis, doing all the same things the Nazis did. They created communism in the late 1700s and have been pushing it as a world wide control system ever since using all of these "separate agencies" as Controlled Opposition.
What I mean by "communism" is a separation of what we think of as "ownership" and "control." In communism "the state" (ostensibly We The People) own everything, but the control rests in the Centralized Authority. That is the system they are creating, and in truth, the entire world has been communist for almost 100 years now, we just don't realize it, because we live with the illusion that we own things. We don't. I mean, we do, or rather there are laws that say we do, but there are also laws that say we don't. They are in conflict, but only the laws that say we don't have any current power.
The CIA (and the Nazi's before them) was, from the getgo designed specifically to create a communist world. They were controlled opposition for the real agenda. Allen Dulles, who was a Rockefeller agent for 30+ years before he helped found the CIA with the Nazis was also the person in charge of starting the Cold War. This was not about "mafia." Their actions as mafia (they are also literally the mafia) was just the way of doing business, that was not their goal. Their goal is as I stated. All evidence to support that statement will be forthcoming, though I have given enough clues that you can almost certainly find corroborating evidence yourself if you look.
You are, like everyone else, not appreciating how much controlled opposition there is. That is why I am writing my report. People need to see the evidence. People need to understand the real scope of The Matrix, and why we believe what we believe.
I agree with this completely. Communism and Capitalism (as we understand the terms) are two sides of the same coin. They both commit the same fraud when applied to a Free Market, i.e. neither one allows for a Free Market, they both create a Centralized Authority and ensure a Free Market can't happen. They both set up the same structure of rule, which is always a fraud of jurisdiction.
I have treaded the same paths you have treaded, fren. I do hope you keep going forward and not let any emotional reasons keep you grounded in one place and stop you from furthering your journey.
This sounds like you are suggesting you have gone further than I have, and that I am speaking in ignorance. I really hope you will listen to what I have said and will look into it. Your assessments are not supported by the evidence that I have seen. From what I am hearing from you, I think you are missing so much of the scope. Perhaps I am incorrect, but I will be putting out my report to corroborate what I have said. If you read it (have you read the first part?) perhaps you can appreciate why I think your scope is too small, and you are missing so much evidence in your analysis.
Nevertheless, you obviously wish to discontinue, and I will respect that.
Absolutely not. I can tell you have done so much research so there is no question of ignorance.
I am actually suggesting that you are limiting your own scope by defining things in black and white the way you have done. Reality is not black and white and I am hoping you will see that.
I will definitely give it a read and write what my thoughts are.
Let me ask you this, what do you think is my analysis?
I appreciate I may have come across that way, but that is more a function of trying to have a conversation about "unbelievable" things without the benefit of all the evidence I have in my report (or notes, or whatever). That is not how I do research. I do not hold on to any beliefs any tighter than the next piece of evidence and I fully recognize my own ignorance.
You have given far too small of a scope to the C_A, and the Cabal. (Or "the Bankers," if you wish, since what I define as the Cabal have been the Bankers for a few thousand years, and it is by their control of money and information (propaganda) that they have ruled the world for all that time).
You seem to think there are two factions to the Cabal, when the Cabal is primarily a religious entity (there is no room for humanists in that religion). I think you may be confusing the Freemasons (a secret society) or the Aristocracy (the "elite" who are often members of the Cabal, but not always, and are the primary feedstock for their agents) with the Cabal (a religious sect that rules the world and hides within other secret societies, including the Freemasons). In short, your analyses seem to, like almost everyone, not appreciate the connectedness of everything, or the scope of the control of The Machine, and the Cabal that runs it. It is likely impossible to appreciate that scope without having seen all the evidence I have seen (thus the reason for my report).
But really I can only go by what you tell me in response, much of which seems just as "black and white" as you accuse me of. It's probably a problem for anyone who tries to talk about stuff that requires evidence for each sentence, but doesn't want to always take the time to dig it up. People tend to use forceful rhetoric to shore up a lack of evidence. I think that may be happening for both of us. For my part, I apologize. I don't want to come across that way.