Am with you on this. I gave him the benefit of the doubt initially but am now convinced he’s a gatekeeper. A living, breathing limited hangout. Same with Dr John Campbell, MP Andrew Bridgen and many more 180 switcheroos. As well as saying platitudes that might sound welcome to folks like us, look out for some version or variety of the “tells”:
they mostly blame MRNA jabs, monkey DNA jabs never mentioned despite comparable if not worse harms
they mostly blame Pfizer (chosen sacrificial pfall guy?), Moderna rarely mentioned (Astra Zeneca and J&J are monkey DNA so are ignored despite comparable harms)
“traditional” vaccines still a safe and effective intervention generally (thanks, pharma!)
“viruses and variants as pathogens” and germ theory orthodoxy is spouted and kept alive and well (thanks, pharma!)
adverse reactions unfortunate but mostly rare, causation isn’t correlation but we should halt or pause to do some study just to be safe
depop, culling, genocide etc references are conspiracy theories and not helpful
COVID-19 illness also causes the same outcomes purported to be jab-related
That they’re all being given platforms by their fellow travellers - whether Russell Brand, Tucker Carlson, the BBC (accidentally and sneakily, of course, for humanity, bro!), the Times, GB News, TV shows etc says it all. I don’t know for sure what the common denominator is, but if I had to guess, it’s what Quigley called The Network: somewhere between weird, gay handshakes and black and white floor tiling, all the way to sodomising goats and Moloch worship.
I'd like to offer another option: each viewpoint is just one step along the way. There's a spokesperson for those who are just waking up to the realization that this particular jab is bad.
There's another group of spokespeople for those who start to distrust all jabs.
And so on.
As long as they don't stop you from moving on, they are less gatekeepers and more door openers.
There's definitely herding going on. You raise a good point. It looks on the face of it like 'Overton window' type manipulation, whereby they're controlling narratives for political or social engineering agendas. However, it's likely much more nefarious and extensively coordinated, where they are all signed up to a direction of travel in which they are like shepherding us along a series of revelation silos for any number of reasons. Chief among them might be the goal to obfuscate from us the fact that any of these revelations in and of themselves are so monumental, so illegal, devious and potentially world-changing on their own, that it's only by the herding and faux respectability do they prevent pitchforks, storming of parliaments and public hangings.
Well put and correct..this is why I insist on getting the message that there never was a virus out there...they want to keep this gravy train fear porn going..
Am with you on this. I gave him the benefit of the doubt initially but am now convinced he’s a gatekeeper. A living, breathing limited hangout. Same with Dr John Campbell, MP Andrew Bridgen and many more 180 switcheroos. As well as saying platitudes that might sound welcome to folks like us, look out for some version or variety of the “tells”:
That they’re all being given platforms by their fellow travellers - whether Russell Brand, Tucker Carlson, the BBC (accidentally and sneakily, of course, for humanity, bro!), the Times, GB News, TV shows etc says it all. I don’t know for sure what the common denominator is, but if I had to guess, it’s what Quigley called The Network: somewhere between weird, gay handshakes and black and white floor tiling, all the way to sodomising goats and Moloch worship.
Strong points.
I'd like to offer another option: each viewpoint is just one step along the way. There's a spokesperson for those who are just waking up to the realization that this particular jab is bad.
There's another group of spokespeople for those who start to distrust all jabs.
And so on.
As long as they don't stop you from moving on, they are less gatekeepers and more door openers.
There's definitely herding going on. You raise a good point. It looks on the face of it like 'Overton window' type manipulation, whereby they're controlling narratives for political or social engineering agendas. However, it's likely much more nefarious and extensively coordinated, where they are all signed up to a direction of travel in which they are like shepherding us along a series of revelation silos for any number of reasons. Chief among them might be the goal to obfuscate from us the fact that any of these revelations in and of themselves are so monumental, so illegal, devious and potentially world-changing on their own, that it's only by the herding and faux respectability do they prevent pitchforks, storming of parliaments and public hangings.
Well put and correct..this is why I insist on getting the message that there never was a virus out there...they want to keep this gravy train fear porn going..