Texas Becomes First State To Potentially Outlaw Chemtrails
(www.ipetitions.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (128)
sorted by:
He knows dirt. And that's the sum of it. He doesn't understand atmospheric phenomena. Contrails are not "normal cloud formations" and never will be. They are artificial cloud formations...but they are only ice crystals. As for Wiggington, I went to geoengineeringwatch and hit the tab for "Spray Jets" and viewed his first up video---which basically proves he doesn't know what he is looking at and behaves like a blowhard. A complete fool can do years of work and "research," but if he is ignorant he will still be a fool.
He can't prove a single claim. He can't prove that anything is being sprayed from an airplane. That would require showing that the airplane is equipped to spray, and capture of the actual spray itself. Otherwise, it is all supposition and prejudice. He doesn't understand contrails. He doesn't understand their dependence on air conditions ("spray turning on and off"). He doesn't understand that overwing flowfields can cause condensation ("separate spray field"). He doesn't understand that the vortex trail behind a wing can mix the contrails together ("spray nozzle misalignment"). His whole case is imaginary.
My original education was as an aerodynamicist and fluid physicist. The company where I worked makes the jetliners that this guy is accusing of being spray vehicles. He is bunk. I notice also that he is blaming the HAARP installation for hurricanes. Lots of hyperventilation. Sheer bunk, all of it. Why do seekers of truth embrace such lies? Maybe you can explain it.
Question...if this is all "naturally occurring" why didn't we see these things 15-20 years ago? I am old enough to know what normal weather and cloud formations look like, even if I don't have the technical knowledge that you have. And tell me why different countries entered into treaties about using weather manipulation and as it relates to warfare. No offense, but you surely can't be blind to what you see with your own two eyes. I guess we just have to agree to disagree. Even if Wiginton is not 100% right in everything he says, it doesn't make him completely wrong in everything. Something is not right...about the contrails and about our weather manipulation and in my book, only a food would deny that.
I remember being a kid in the 80s looking at the trails left by planes and wondering how they were made.
I've lived far far out in the country where my nearest neighbor was miles away and noticed the trails then.
Now I live near DC and have the joy of planes from Ronald Reagan Airport constantly coming and going a few miles away from my apartment. So I see many of these trails every day.
Never understood why the elite would be dumping chemicals all over their own homes. Northern Virginia has three or four of the highest income per capita neighborhoods in the US, so it's definitely where some of the elite hang their hats.
Even if the criss-crossing trails are "only" ice crystals or "only" water vapor, they still need to be stopped! They affect the climate. Water vapor is the most prevalent "greenhouse gas".
(Not that I'm suggesting a warming effect but a local climate-altering effect.)
The only way to stop them is to ban airplanes. I don't think that plan will go over well with the public. But Greta will love you for it, I'm sure.
The best way to prevent them (other than just not flying) is to fly at lower altitudes. But that uses much more fuel than flying at higher altitudes with thinner air. So airlines would either have to sacrifice their profits and enrage their shareholders or they would have to hike their fares up around 60% more than what they are now, according to what I've read about it.
And that just reduces the number of trails. It doesn't stop them all.
(1) We have been seeing contrails since World War II. You can find videos of bomber formations heading to Germany, issuing profuse contrails. I think the escort fighters were also doing this.
(2) Civilian airliner traffic began the changeover to jet aircraft around 1960. They operated up to the tropopause and often produced contrails.
(3) With the introduction of new wide-body aircraft and high-bypass-ratio turbofans, civilian airliners began to operate at higher altitudes (e.g., 40,000 feet) where conditions for contrails are more favorable (dry and cold). That was 15-20 years ago.
Nations are like herds of sheep. They will gather together over what sounds good, whether or not there is any actual problem. Witness what is going on with "climate change" (the former "global warming").
I am not blind to anything. I see contrails daily, being at the south end of a major international airport. I have seen lenticular clouds and understand how they form. I have seen condensation form from overwing airflow (same process). I have studied aircraft wakes as part of a research program to detect them at a distance.
Wiggington is not even remotely close to being correct in his key assertions. Would you pick a brain surgeon for your daughter based on "it doesn't make him completely wrong in everything." You are replacing scientific substance with a crap game. "Oh, he's a rotten shot, but sometimes he hits the target." You are in no position to know whether he hits the target at all, and neither is he.
All you have left is your ignorance ("something is not right") and wishful thinking ("only a fool would deny that"). Well, you are in a rather poor position to be calling an expert in the field a fool, when all you have are questions and I have the answers.
See my previous comment. No matter the content or cause of the trails, they still need to be stopped.
Contrails do not need to be stopped. Nor can they be. It would be like stopping clouds. There is no harm.