Yes, this mask technology has been in use for years. However, the clip with Emma Watson is a fake. You can't just pull off a mask and have perfect hair underneath!
It almost looks so fake that you wonder if it is intended to be easily "debunked." The more interesting interview is with that woman from like 20 years ago. I wish I could find it. I think she was working with the CIA. They had really unbelievable masks at that time.
Found it. See below. It's a quick couple of minutes.
The video is more recent than I remembered but the former CIA "Chief of Disguise" person narrating is talking about the technology they had decades ago. "The fact that we are allowed to show (what we were doing a long time ago with masks) tells me the CIA have moved on. I don't know what they are doing now. I shouldn't know. I'm dying to know."
Thank you! I would imagine deep fake imagery using computers since the vast majority of the world doesn't interact with these guys on a day to day basis.
If you don't need to make many public appearances, a stunt/body double for transition scenes is all that is needed between broadcast meetings.
Well ok it is a fake, but doesn't that prove the point that fakes can appear to be legit? Emma looked 100% before the CGI weirdness happened in the video.
NSFW since the mask has fake breasts & it gets removed to reveal another person underneath.
Saw a Maxine Waters mask on a twitter vid recently.
Makes one wonder how many of congress are just using masks & unelected individuals. Will forcing members to be present to vote reveal many are no longer with us?
So the glitches from greenscreen of Bush, Clinton & Cheney from that video in the past (looked like they were greenscreened in) could also have been CGI.
Not suggesting it was, just looking at options about deep fakes, or masks of any sort. Even digital.
Yes, this mask technology has been in use for years. However, the clip with Emma Watson is a fake. You can't just pull off a mask and have perfect hair underneath!
It almost looks so fake that you wonder if it is intended to be easily "debunked." The more interesting interview is with that woman from like 20 years ago. I wish I could find it. I think she was working with the CIA. They had really unbelievable masks at that time.
I know what one you're talking about -- she fooled someone, can't remember who.
Ghw bush was the guy she said she fooled.
I would love to see that one.
Found it. See below. It's a quick couple of minutes.
The video is more recent than I remembered but the former CIA "Chief of Disguise" person narrating is talking about the technology they had decades ago. "The fact that we are allowed to show (what we were doing a long time ago with masks) tells me the CIA have moved on. I don't know what they are doing now. I shouldn't know. I'm dying to know."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0uAh02-vPU
Thank you! I would imagine deep fake imagery using computers since the vast majority of the world doesn't interact with these guys on a day to day basis.
If you don't need to make many public appearances, a stunt/body double for transition scenes is all that is needed between broadcast meetings.
Well ok it is a fake, but doesn't that prove the point that fakes can appear to be legit? Emma looked 100% before the CGI weirdness happened in the video.
That's because it WAS her. The video merged the real Emma Watson with that other actress...can't remember her name, removing a mask.
I think it was
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sof%C3%ADa_Vergara
Yeah...that's the one!
True, though this shows that a deep fake can exist IMO.
Thanks for pointing this out.
NSFW since the mask has fake breasts & it gets removed to reveal another person underneath.
Saw a Maxine Waters mask on a twitter vid recently.
Makes one wonder how many of congress are just using masks & unelected individuals. Will forcing members to be present to vote reveal many are no longer with us?
that is a good question...
Question is: what happened to the hair on the mask?
I do wonder, was this CGI? Did it fall off the back perfectly? That is just weird.
it's cgi
Her head is bigger after removing the mask. Her hair is prefect. The cut is obvious.
Fake. Fake and gay.
I expect better around here.
So the glitches from greenscreen of Bush, Clinton & Cheney from that video in the past (looked like they were greenscreened in) could also have been CGI.
Not suggesting it was, just looking at options about deep fakes, or masks of any sort. Even digital.
The Emma Watson one at the beginning is some sort of CGI. Watch the hair transition.