"We're going to have a big surprise for the country in two weeks. A really big surprise. I don't even want to tease this. Its so cool. We'll do it live here on my show."
Tuesday, 24 January 2023, The Lindell Report / Frankspeech - 5 min, 17 sec time hack
Best guess by process of elimination is that there may be movement in the effort to lift or limit the gag order on Dennis Montgomery and thereby allow Montgomery to testify on Lindell's behalf in the Dominion v Lindell case in regard to the capabilities of Hammer / Scorecard and the 32 terabytes of 2020 election hacking data that was subject of Mike Lindell's August 2021 Cyber Symposium.
The last filing by Lindell's attorneys in the effort to lift the Montgomery gag order was a proposed draft order submitted to Judge Denny / Nevada District Court limiting the scope of the original U.S Government protective (gag) order issued in the 2007 Montgomery v eTreppid Technologies case as only effective / enforceable in that case and imposing no restriction over Montgomery testifying in matters concerning the Dominion v Lindell case.
If Judge Denny signs that order, it would force the DoJ to issue a new protective order to block Montgomery from testifying about the 32 terabytes of 2020 election hacking data and Hammer/Scorecard capability.
Seeking a new protective / gag order on Montgomery would have the same effect in the court of public opinion as validating Lindell's claims of election flipping in the 2020 election.
Again, a best guess as to what the "big surprise" might be.
Montgomery v. eTreppid Technologies (3:06-cv-00056) District Court, D. Nevada
Tuesday, 10 January 2023
Submission of PROPOSED ORDER on 1236 Motion, by Plaintiff Dennis Montgomery, Counter Defendants Dennis Montgomery, Montgomery Family Trust. (Chattah, Sigal) (Entered: 01/10/2023)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1253.0.pdf
Link / Full docket Montgomery v eTreppid Technologies
Do not think "big surprise" is associated with anything regarding the Dominion v Lindell case per se... the last filing in this case concerned establishing deadlines in regards issues concerning discovery issues.
Tuesday, 10 January 2023
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Carl J. Nichols: Status Conference held on 1/10/2023. The Court directed the parties to meet and confer no later than January 20, 2023, make a good faith effort to narrow the set of information requested of the counties and follow with the Court no later than January 27, 2023, on their agreement or respective proposals; filings shall be no more than 10 pages long.
Link / Full docket Dominion v Lindell
Do not think "big surprise is associated with the Coomer v Lindell case either... the last filing concerned setting up phone conference regarding discovery issues and setting date for phone conference for 27 January 2023.
Wednesday, 11 January 2023
MINUTE ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that a Telephonic Discovery Conference is set for January 27, 2023 at 10:30 a.m. Counsel shall submit, if appropriate, the chart or joint status report and any written materials to [email protected] on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 24, 2023.
Link / Full docket Coomer v Lindell
You can use the links to any of the full case dockets above to monitor for new filings in the above Lindell associated lawsuits.
Have some more important updates coming up on what's happening in courts re Dominion v Lindell and Montgomery v eTreppid Technologies. Will link to your u/simon_says so you do not miss them.
Some thoughts for you and u/MagaDeburger
Q linked to the https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/119629.pdf in https://qalerts.app/?q=3882+ . Extensive study of this counterinsurgency guide at the time radically informed my comprehension of just what the Q PsyOp is about (it is both an offensive and defensive operation affecting and effecting (verbal usage) how and what fundamental alterations in the individual and collective identities (personal and national) are required to achieve the psychological, cultural, and social conditioning necessary to achieve the end goal of lasting transformational "sea change" in our individual and collective consciousness. (What a mouthful!). Jon Herold / Patel Patriot's Devolution Series dovetailed nicely to COIN Guide as far as how a COG / Continuity of Government / operation has been clandestinely and covertly executed.
https://burningbright.substack.com/p/devolution-for-dummies (readers digest)
https://www.devolution.link/ (magnum opus)
This is where NFD use to post the Ricky Jay video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtgUSUHnzLI&t=2933s
The point... one of the verticals I track is the legal vertical. Lawfare is the tool of the adversary (The Puppet Masters - read the book again if you have not already... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Puppet_Masters for a kind of metaphorical allegory that provides a conceptually simple story I have used as a kind of introductory parable that not a small number of friends have found useful in the exercise of suspending disbelief long enough to expand their thinking and breakdown the understandable bias of not wanting to expose themselves to the Q path of deconstruction of concepts of Puppet Masters and The Deep State.
Back on point... the Lawfare vertical. Deep State uses it to attack and beat down any opposition or resistance, to uneven the playing field, and to censor through fear of personal and financial ruin public discussion, let alone debate, of Deep State existence and how it operates.
What I have come to perceive in reading the court filings (the ones available online) is that the counter to Deep State Lawfare has become operationally asymmetric in that there appears to be converging patterns (just as the counter narratives to those propagated in the Mockingbird Mainstream Media) in individual cases (Kari Lake v Hobbs, Dominion v. Lindell, Missouri and Louisiana v Biden, Coomer v. Lindell, Montgomery v eTreppid Technologies) that, I am becoming more convinced as each of the individual cases progress, that there is in the background a common coordinating entity (let's just call it Q for now) that is asymmetric in design and execution that has been and is deployed against Puppet Master directed, Deep State executed, Lawfare.
I am suggesting a discussion of asymmetric Lawfare, based on the principles (a playbook as it were) laid out in the COIN Guide linked above in Q drop 3882 (3883 on https://qaggregator.news/ if it ever comes back on line.... have thoughts about that too - short version - like Truth Social - I believe qagg was only operative in the U.S. (and maybe Australia, maybe, only ever saw one GAW user who claimed to be located in Australia ever mention qagg) ... only U.S base... and is being reconfigured to be available internationally... just a theory for now.... qagg.pub which was my Q research site for years, and use to get over 100,000 views regularly on a daily basis, which was, as I recall, taken off line when the board administrator - vice president for cybersecurity at CITI Bank - was doxxed.
Some interesting posts coming later today... will link you both
Always appreciate the insights. Counter-lawfare lawfare. Love it. Although, still seems like a route doomed to failure because the judicial system is immensely incompetent and/or corrupt.
Was the site actually banned in some countries, or rather made accessible in only some countries? It certainly seemed like qagg compiled the most extensive repository of various Q related information and there was some kind of direct connection to Truth Social. Wonder why there would be a focus on just reaching to the US audience first before going global?
"Although, still seems like a route doomed to failure because the judicial system is immensely incompetent and/or corrupt."
The aim is not to win in court...
Game Theory 101, Rule 1...
"Never play a strategy dominated game."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nM3rTU927io
The aim is to pull the whole thing down...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJnQnD9EXnw
Posting mostly for the beginning of the scene, but the entire clip is quite brilliant...
https://youtu.be/oWXsb4mfqVo
The irony of claiming that being a slavemaster isn't immoral, yet condemning a hypothetical enemy for allegedly planning to enslave the slaver...
The Calhounian lunacy
Indeed. The lawfare front is a diversion, delaying action. Expose the rigged game for what it is. Then destroy it all.
"Wonder why there would be a focus on just reaching to the US audience first before going global?"
Language: English
Culture: American (U.S.)
History and current events: U.S. centric (why I link to so many wiki articles, etc)
Beta testing in the U.S. before going international...
Almost like how the American Revolution was alpha testing for the rest of the world 😉