HOLY SHIT. I just verified this info (sauce in comments), myself. Initial German tank delivery: 14. Total German tank delivery: 88. Those of us who do their homework know what "1488“ means (see graphic). This is 100% CLEAR Nazi symbolism! Can they be more clear that this is a continuation of WW2??
(media.greatawakening.win)
SYMBOLISM
I just read all the posts containing "Rothschild," and NONE of them mentioning funding Hitler...not even close. So, unless you come up with something concrete, you're just spreading propaganda.
https://qalerts.app/?n=142
https://qalerts.app/?n=939
"Was Hitler a puppet?" Just a question. Nothing implied.
"So Hitler was a puppet of the controlling families of the NWO?" Again, just a question. Could be a proposal to get the reader to think the other direction just as easily.
But again, #940 is a deal-breaker for me.
The second one is Q replying to the person asking the question with no response other than the link to their comment. The implication being that the answer is yes and that it needs no further explanation.
The first one reads:
"Was Hitler a puppet?
Who was his handler?"
This is Q's style. The following question answers the preceding. Only a puppet has a handler. This isn't a question, nor is it even an implication, it's just the standard way Q presents information.
And this is yet another reason I put no stock in Q. I realize "he" (or whomever) wants followers to be thinkers, but his style...always proposing questions...leaves too much room for error and/or misinterpretation. Why are people on Q-boards still trying to figure out what he meant? To me, at this point (and notwithstanding his historical error on #940), it's a distraction.
The fact that he is historically-incorrect on #940 makes it very easy to come to the conclusion that he is wrong in his other claims about Hitler.
Also this: https://qalerts.app/?n=1941
This one seems to reference the mistake of #940. The term, "Nazi," has become a caricature of itself. You know why I think this way? Because most of what is claimed to be "Nazi-ism" today is completely the opposite of what NSDAP and Hitler stood for. That tells me it's a Zionist psyop.
Who told you what Hitler stood for? Who wrote the history books? Who won the war?
I am a history buff, but even putting it in those terms is not accurate. My keenest interest is in WWI, The Treaty of Versailles, The Weimar Republic, and WWII. Did you know there are different versions of Mein Kampf? I've compared the translations, and there is some clear obfuscations between the versions. Zionists have infiltrated Hitler's quotes, and mistranslated his words to their advantage.
I know enough to make qualified judgments. Q has not demonstrated to me that he knows recognized historical fact...especially making a boneheaded false comparison like #940. I don't have time to give something like Q the benefit of the doubt after something like that. There is too much actual truth to spend time on.
But also recognize this: Q-followers NEED people like me on board, too. People like me are the ones to call out errors, and offer interpretations that others will skip over because they trust "everything they read on the internet" without question. I see this all the time on this board. Someone posts a meme, and everyone falls into line assuming it's the truth, when it's anything but.
I'm just offering my opinion. I'm not trying to change anyone else's mind. But I think it's wise to take Q with a grain of salt. He's already proven he doesn't understand, at least in this case, history.
And that's the point. They know it's not Nazism. They are projecting. They are Nazis, so they call everyone else Nazis. Just like they project in every other way. Racist, sexist, tyrant. Every label they use seems to be a projection.
And I'm sure they would import a bunch of Nazi scientists and officials with operation paperclip if they weren't buddy buddy with them...