That video was really good (I had not seen it before). It pointed out all the actors and the various roles they played in the drama. It certainly appears that it was all staged, just like one of those training exercises used as a reference.
This makes a lot of the aftermath make more sense. Why the guy that "killed" Babbitt was never charged, and so on.
This leads to the obvious question - what was the point of the staged shooting? What purpose did it serve?
Another question - what was the point of the J6 rally? What purpose did it serve? The J6 rally forced the evacuation of the capital and interrupted the certification proceedings. It allowed somebody to grab Pelosi's laptop, among other things. Was that the purpose?
Moves and counter moves... but we still don't know which side is doing what. All we have are a lot of guesses.
Which brings us to recent events. MTG bringing up the "murder" in her committee meeting. Where does that lead? They have the thousands of hours of J6 video. What are they going to do with all of it?
Videos that tell you what to think about what you see are not rock solid proof. There are a lot of details he is interpreting for you that don't necessarily require that particular interpretation if you mute his commentary. It's a maybe/maybe not situation.
That video was really good (I had not seen it before). It pointed out all the actors and the various roles they played in the drama. It certainly appears that it was all staged, just like one of those training exercises used as a reference.
This makes a lot of the aftermath make more sense. Why the guy that "killed" Babbitt was never charged, and so on.
This leads to the obvious question - what was the point of the staged shooting? What purpose did it serve?
Another question - what was the point of the J6 rally? What purpose did it serve? The J6 rally forced the evacuation of the capital and interrupted the certification proceedings. It allowed somebody to grab Pelosi's laptop, among other things. Was that the purpose?
Moves and counter moves... but we still don't know which side is doing what. All we have are a lot of guesses.
Which brings us to recent events. MTG bringing up the "murder" in her committee meeting. Where does that lead? They have the thousands of hours of J6 video. What are they going to do with all of it?
Videos that tell you what to think about what you see are not rock solid proof. There are a lot of details he is interpreting for you that don't necessarily require that particular interpretation if you mute his commentary. It's a maybe/maybe not situation.