Interesting Chat GPT 2020 election Q/A
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
So 100% of all verified registered voters voted? Never happened.
I think smoke was starting to pour out of the poor thing. I was picturing a robot from the 70’s having a logic failure and burning up.
We're not sposed to have to do math on GAW--especially voting math.
But 155M outta 155M registered voters is 100%, not 66.3%.
BTW, EACs report to Congress added up to 104% when you totalled early mail ballots+early in person+In Person on election day..
All this leads to itchy scalps which leads to dandruff which leads to medicated shampoo which leads back to big pharma which shows how they were complicit in the election crap of 2020.
IMHO.
The 66,3% refers to the turnout(should’ve been 152.5 million) vs total eligible voters(230million).
The question to the AI is how there could be cast 2.5 million more votes in 2020 than registered users.
The next question to be asked the AI is how many same day registration in 2020, that number should be very close to 2.5 million.
And even if it is, that doesn’t explain how in the world the 2020 election managed to get 100% of the registered voters to vote.
2020 is fishy as fuck, but the math here is correct.
I like the way it suggests people voting in multiple states could explain how # votes exceeds # voters.
Isn’t that a federal crime?
The obvious concern is this AI has already been programmed to "spin". The answer for the clear calculation of votes in excess of registered numbers would be: fraud. However the AI was programmed already to say "It is not possible to definitively conclude that the election was fraudulent........" AI can calculate probabilities quite fast and accurately. The next question should be: what are the odds of a fraudulent election?