To be blunt… GAME OVER.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
They aren’t prohibited. Fraud vitiates everything. Courts have ruled people were not duly elected before. They also ruled against corrupt politicians.
If the SCOTUS rules that members of Congress are not duly elected, the Congress itself will have to remove those members.
However this is not the remedy the B brothers is asking for, they want the SCOTUS to do the unseating themself.
Which is strictly prohibited.
The Brunson case is not about the cheating, it’s about not investigating the cheating, and breaking their oath not doing it.
This is a bullshit case that lacks standing, and even a 5 year old can see it.
The Brunson are grifters, and have made a fortune out of this case.
How did they make a fortune off this case? Show me some receipts.
Where is it prohibited?
In the Constitution.
Under Article I, Section 5, clause 2, of the Constitution, a Member of Congress may be removed from office before the normal expiration of his or her constitutional term by an “expulsion” from the Senate (if a Senator) or from the House of Representatives (if a Representative) upon a formal vote on a resolution agreed to by two-thirds of the Members of that body present and voting.
So a member of the Congress can be remove if he resigns, dies, is voted out by his constituents or an expulsion from office voted by his peers.
The SCOTUS can never remove an elected member.