Yeah these things are why unOrganized Militias are default responsibilities of practically all (male) citizens in good standing with Society. Under the various Militia Acts of our history here in America , codified into one with the Militia Act of 1903, all males between 17 and 45 if memory serves me here, are required to be in either the Organized or unOrganized Militias, if not otherwise Serving in an official government capacity.

And the unOrganized Militias are precisely that - no official structures of leadership are required, in fact small unit groupings are much preferred and prompted. Like the Founding Fathers and other Minutemen of history we are bidden to remain unseen, unheard, using discreet communications and practicing constant security and anonymous doings. A citizen does not have to formally join a militia, it is an automatic default position we all inherit as citizens.

It is not a 'right' thing, it is simply Law. Yeah of course it is the 'right' which supports the notion of Law, so it may appear to be a right thing, but it actually speaks to all honest citizens.

The leftists try to control that, the Militia aspect of our Law; they want leaders such as hillary to whisper 'resist' in your ear not so silently. Or they want Mad Max to holler 'get in their faces' loudly, they do not truly embrace the idea of individualism which IS an essential ingredient of all honest citizens. So they may choose to opt out of Reality, but the fact is the concepts discussed here are expressed in our Law, the Militia Act.

Leaderless resistance is simply Thinking For One's self. Thinking, that's the part the Enemy cannot allow their minions to embrace.

Millions of us quietly carry on in such a mindset, we are unseen for the most part but very much present.

Small unit tactics, think strategically and act tactically. Do not herd up, do not advertise, do not seek attentions. Plan to defend, first, plan to patrol or recon but in small numbers, isolated perhaps but never alone.

Sticky: visibility.

Anons this is a 7 page read talking about leaderless resistance, and it should be something you all either read or download to read later. I'm almost certain you will be clicking on a lot of things in this (it was from 1990's but has origins from the 1960s), and a lot of the assumptions made came true for today.

It talks about 3 types of resistance command structures: Organizations, cells, and shadow cells. The author makes the case that Organizations and cells can fall because they have leadership structures and can be taken down. So if we are to take on tyranny we need to examine shadow cells, which is much like how the "committees of correspondence" acted during the American Revolution. eg: I, fatality am a shadow-cell of 1 person.

Thanks to u/krypt0 for bringing this to my attention, because it's just what we need for backup assurances.

The catbox link: https://files.catbox.moe/8gsbei.pdf

The ‘leaderless resistance’ concept has been a long‐standing subject of internal debate in the American radical right. It emerged originally as a prescription for irregular warfare against invading ‘communist’ troops in the early 1960s. Turned against the American government rather than hostile foreign invaders, the tactic was employed by a few of the most committed members of the American radical right in the 1970s and early 1980s. The term became widely known with the publication of Louis R. Beam's ‘Leaderless Resistance’ essay in 1992, only a few months before the bloody shoot‐out between Christian Identity adherent Randy Weaver and federal agents and the Waco tragedy. This article follows the history of leaderless resistance from its inception through its various permutations in the disparate ideological camps of the American radical right.

Muh radical right.

The Grey Man comes to mind.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=The%20Grey%20Man

Just read this, thank you for sharing.