💥 Something worth smart Anons to look at ! Interesting connections here !
(media.greatawakening.win)
Q-analysis!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
As someone politely skeptical of the Q posts( I simply don't have the time to dive into them, but the basic premise of a secret cabal of super good guys working behind the scenes to root out the corruption sounds a bit farfetched, and a little bit like something tom clancy or michael critchton would have written), I hope you don't mind my two bits worth on this...
One thing to keep in mind is even though the general public views q as some insane cult of violent trump supporters (what else is new, right?), the q posts are public knowledge, so anyone with internet access could have read them, snipped out the useful bits, and forwarded them to a grassley staffer. While I grew up in iowa, I wasn't really keyed into politics at the time, so I can't really personally speak to his political history(though I have a stepdad who referred to tom vilsack as "tom nutsack" 😂), but it might be worth diving into.
Some things to look for while you're digging:
has grassley said things like this pre-q/pre-2016?
what is grassley's voting record on bills that are pro-government transparency/accountability?
what is grassley's record on sponsorship of such bills?
how frequently has grassley discussed transparency/accountability pre-trump?
has grassley always held the same opinion on such things, or was there a sudden "switch" on the issue when it became popular for an extended period of time?
Also keep in mind politicians are notorious for exploiting political movements for their own ends. Look at Neolib Democrats and the progressive movement for a prominent example.
Again, I don't want to splash water on anyone's opinion, but I feel it would be irresponsible of me as an outsider not to challenge any confirmation bias. Even though I'm ambivalent on Q, I like you guys. you do good research.
(P.S.: sorry for the textwall, I kinda got on a roll. 😅
edit: as some of you pointed out, I made an ass of myself here, and I'm sorry. It wasn't my intent to bash you or what you do, and yeah, I could stand to be a lot less lazy.
again, I'm sorry
You're basing all of this off of secondhand knowledge of the Q posts? Why not just read them? Because the "basic premise" you've highlighted here is a cartoonish summary.
Before categorizing the entire plan as "farfetched" you should probably read the posts for yourself. That way you'll actually know what you're talking about, before providing a list of instructions for others.
I think it's irresponsible of you to assume you have a grasp on Q without reading the posts. If you have time to write a textwall, you have time to do your due diligence.
I have tried, but it's a lot to absorb honestly, and most of the links to the post seem to be out of context quotes which makes it a little bit dry. you have a point though, I do need to read into it when I can (my internet is throttled down at the moment by my isp =/ )
for what it's worth, I'm not shitting on you guys or Q. sorry it came off that way in my post. Clearly I need to word things more carefully next time.
Incorrect, the point of the drops is to shine a big spotlight toward things the public needs to know. There is no Tom Clancy novel. Just someone pointing their finger at the bad guy, delivering evidence, and saying "that's the bad guys, and there's more bad guys over there".
That's where you lose interest?
The very basic and initial introduction to Q?
You got it wrong right off the bat?
Interesting.
Good luck out there anon. In the real world.
Do you know that DEEPTHROAT was the former FBI Deputy Director leaking intel?
It's not far fetched. Read some history.
On May 31, 2005, W. Mark Felt’s family ends 30 years of speculation, identifying Felt, the former FBI assistant director, as “Deep Throat,” the secret source who helped unravel the Watergate scandal. Felt's admission, made in an article in Vanity Fair magazine, took legendary reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, who had promised to keep their source’s identity a secret until his death, by surprise. Tapes show that President Nixon himself had speculated that Felt was the secret informant as early as 1973.
The question “Who was Deep Throat?” had been investigated relentlessly in the ensuing years since Watergate in movies, books, televisions shows and on the Internet. America was obsessed with the shadowy figure who went to great lengths to conceal his involvement with the Washington Post reporters. Although his name was often mentioned as a possibility, Felt consistently denied being Deep Throat, even writing in his 1979 memoir, “I never leaked information to Woodward and Bernstein or to anyone else!” Even as recently as six years before the admission, he was quoted as saying, “It would be contrary to my responsibility as a loyal employee of the FBI to leak information.”
After the death of J. Edgar Hoover, then director of the FBI, Felt, who was serving as the bureau’s assistant director, wanted the job and was angry over Nixon’s failure to appoint him. He was also upset over Nixon’s attempts to stall the bureau’s investigation into the Watergate break-ins. So, when Bob Woodward called the veteran FBI employee to request information about the bureau’s Watergate investigation, Felt agreed to talk. But his cooperation came with strict restrictions. Felt refused to be quoted, even anonymously, and agreed only to confirm information already obtained, refusing to provide new information. And, of course, the reporters had to promise to keep his identity a secret. Felt was only contacted on matters of great importance.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/deep-throat-is-revealed
Those are all good things to keep in mind. Sometimes there is no connection at all.
Most in the Q community would regard this as more of a shout-out than a proof. Not something to share with the broader public, but an obvious connection to Q themes that could be the foundation for a proof.
I dug on it for an hour or so and couldn't come up with anything, but I always learn other info during my digs so it's no loss.
You have time to write lengthy posts on a forum dedicated to something you don't believe in...but you don't have time to read the source material?
why not? feminists do it all the time, lmao.
kidding aside, I should look into the stuff again. if I'm being honest with myself, I just suffer from a chronic illness called laziness, lol
Kinda defeats the object of being here.