I never suggested I know the truth. I know literally nothing. In fact the only thing I know for certain is that I don't know anything. I have however spent a great deal of time looking at the evidence. The tenets of Christianity (any version) as professed by the formal religions do not fit all of the evidence. That is the only reason I suggest there is more to the truth than anyone who adheres to those tenets realizes. It isn't because I want them to be incorrect. My only goal in life is for my mind to be open enough to see the evidence, whatever that may be. The only reason I suggest the tenets of your religion may be incorrect is because the more you dig into the evidence, the less the tenets of those formal systems fit the facts.
Any theory of how Reality works that does not fit all of the evidence is wrong. It's really that simple.
I barely scratched the surface with what I showed you, and you couldn't even address the most important parts. The parts you did address were attempts to force the facts to fit your beliefs without the slightest attempt to appreciate what those facts actually suggest. I was hoping (like I always hope with those who are so certain that they fully understand Reality), that you would get a glimpse into a larger world than the one you have restricted yourself to with the beliefs that have been taught to you by the Catholic Church.
The evidence suggests that You are more than what you think you are (assuming you have restricted yourself to the box that the Catholic Church, or any common "whole truth" interpretation of the small little Bible it adheres to teaches). The evidence suggest that you are the Divine Spark AKA a Son or Daughter of God (exactly the same as Jesus) AKA a Split-Apart from Source. You are not separate from God. God is not a separate entity from you. You are a part of Source. You are Source. I mean, of course you are. How could it be any other way. Thinking that only through Jesus can you be what you are (a part of Source) is the Big Lie designed specifically to control society, through the creation of "the hierarchy."
Until people realize that they have been placed in a box, they will never be able to look at their boundaries and transcend them. The Catholic Church (and all other formal religions) were all created by the same organization to build that box. Once people see it (if that ever happens en masse), is the moment of Revelation, the true Great Awakening.
I suggest it isn't what people think it will be. Most people who think they are "awakened" to the "larger truth of our world" have only barely seen the first veil.
That is NOT what I said. You are twisting my words. I never said "I know you are wrong," nor did I imply that I knew that to be true. I said explicitly that the evidence suggests. That is not me "knowing," that is me seeing substantial evidence that supports a different position.
Whatever the Truth is, Is what It Is. I don't know it, I don't profess to know it, but I can follow evidence, and I can see when a conclusion doesn't fit with the evidence. That has nothing to do with "knowing truth," that is simply how the act of reason works. ANYONE using logic, based on the same premises comes to the same conclusion. That is what logic is. It is not mutable. Logic is not truth however, logic is just a self-consistent language. The conclusion relies on the premises. If the premises are shown false, or premises are missing from the logical construction, the conclusion is also false. To test premises or determine if you are missing something important you must be willing to look at the evidence in earnest.
If you can learn to appreciate the depth of the difference between "knowing" and "the evidence suggests," perhaps you can better appreciate the evidence itself.
Why bother sharing if you have no way to know if any of it is true?
How can you know that anything is True? The Truth is Whatever it is. The best we can do is investigate the evidence and see where it leads. We can only do that if we look in earnest at all of the evidence.
If you release the need to believe that you know the truth, you can engage in honest investigation. Once you "know" it, you lose that capacity.
You made a lot of matter of fact statements for someone who doesn't know or trust anything.
I tried very hard to qualify my statements as "the evidence suggests." This means it was my assessment of the evidence I have seen. The "statements of fact" were just that, facts. Facts are not "truth," they are reports of events. I showed you the teenciest, tiniest bit of evidence, just to see what would happen. You didn't even engage with it in the slightest. There is so much more evidence to support my assertions if you were genuinely interested in seeing it.
If I thought for one second you would dig in yourself, taking on the investigation in earnest, I would bring certain other pieces to your attention. You aren't.
People who are "awakened" are always amazed that so few see "the obvious truth" of the corruption in [insert evil entity here]. The reason people don't see is because they refuse to look in earnest. If they look at all (which they generally don't), they only look to justify their current beliefs, never digging deeper than the surface where they can explain it away. If they can't explain it away they dismiss it as "irrelevant" or "obvious lies."
This is how the world remains in slavery, and how all the worlds fuckery actually happens, by our desire to hold on to "what we know to be true." That desire is exploited to maintain control.
I never suggested I know the truth. I know literally nothing. In fact the only thing I know for certain is that I don't know anything. I have however spent a great deal of time looking at the evidence. The tenets of Christianity (any version) as professed by the formal religions do not fit all of the evidence. That is the only reason I suggest there is more to the truth than anyone who adheres to those tenets realizes. It isn't because I want them to be incorrect. My only goal in life is for my mind to be open enough to see the evidence, whatever that may be. The only reason I suggest the tenets of your religion may be incorrect is because the more you dig into the evidence, the less the tenets of those formal systems fit the facts.
Any theory of how Reality works that does not fit all of the evidence is wrong. It's really that simple.
I barely scratched the surface with what I showed you, and you couldn't even address the most important parts. The parts you did address were attempts to force the facts to fit your beliefs without the slightest attempt to appreciate what those facts actually suggest. I was hoping (like I always hope with those who are so certain that they fully understand Reality), that you would get a glimpse into a larger world than the one you have restricted yourself to with the beliefs that have been taught to you by the Catholic Church.
The evidence suggests that You are more than what you think you are (assuming you have restricted yourself to the box that the Catholic Church, or any common "whole truth" interpretation of the small little Bible it adheres to teaches). The evidence suggest that you are the Divine Spark AKA a Son or Daughter of God (exactly the same as Jesus) AKA a Split-Apart from Source. You are not separate from God. God is not a separate entity from you. You are a part of Source. You are Source. I mean, of course you are. How could it be any other way. Thinking that only through Jesus can you be what you are (a part of Source) is the Big Lie designed specifically to control society, through the creation of "the hierarchy."
Until people realize that they have been placed in a box, they will never be able to look at their boundaries and transcend them. The Catholic Church (and all other formal religions) were all created by the same organization to build that box. Once people see it (if that ever happens en masse), is the moment of Revelation, the true Great Awakening.
I suggest it isn't what people think it will be. Most people who think they are "awakened" to the "larger truth of our world" have only barely seen the first veil.
But you know for sure I'm wrong? Genius. Good luck out there.
That is NOT what I said. You are twisting my words. I never said "I know you are wrong," nor did I imply that I knew that to be true. I said explicitly that the evidence suggests. That is not me "knowing," that is me seeing substantial evidence that supports a different position.
Whatever the Truth is, Is what It Is. I don't know it, I don't profess to know it, but I can follow evidence, and I can see when a conclusion doesn't fit with the evidence. That has nothing to do with "knowing truth," that is simply how the act of reason works. ANYONE using logic, based on the same premises comes to the same conclusion. That is what logic is. It is not mutable. Logic is not truth however, logic is just a self-consistent language. The conclusion relies on the premises. If the premises are shown false, or premises are missing from the logical construction, the conclusion is also false. To test premises or determine if you are missing something important you must be willing to look at the evidence in earnest.
If you can learn to appreciate the depth of the difference between "knowing" and "the evidence suggests," perhaps you can better appreciate the evidence itself.
Why bother sharing if you have no way to know if any of it is true? Who do you think you are fooling?
You made a lot of matter of fact statements for someone who doesn't know or trust anything.
Spare me the word salads, Mr. Know Nothing.
How can you know that anything is True? The Truth is Whatever it is. The best we can do is investigate the evidence and see where it leads. We can only do that if we look in earnest at all of the evidence.
If you release the need to believe that you know the truth, you can engage in honest investigation. Once you "know" it, you lose that capacity.
I tried very hard to qualify my statements as "the evidence suggests." This means it was my assessment of the evidence I have seen. The "statements of fact" were just that, facts. Facts are not "truth," they are reports of events. I showed you the teenciest, tiniest bit of evidence, just to see what would happen. You didn't even engage with it in the slightest. There is so much more evidence to support my assertions if you were genuinely interested in seeing it.
If I thought for one second you would dig in yourself, taking on the investigation in earnest, I would bring certain other pieces to your attention. You aren't.
People who are "awakened" are always amazed that so few see "the obvious truth" of the corruption in [insert evil entity here]. The reason people don't see is because they refuse to look in earnest. If they look at all (which they generally don't), they only look to justify their current beliefs, never digging deeper than the surface where they can explain it away. If they can't explain it away they dismiss it as "irrelevant" or "obvious lies."
This is how the world remains in slavery, and how all the worlds fuckery actually happens, by our desire to hold on to "what we know to be true." That desire is exploited to maintain control.