SCOTUS on Brunson case, This Friday?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Lets see what happens...
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
With all respect, I didn't say they don't have standing. Actually they DO have great standing.
I'm just asking about the remedy. Where in the constitution does it allow SCOTUS to be the overseer to the legislative branch? It doesn't. 3 Co-equal branches. Where in the constitution does SCOTUS have the ability to remove any legislator? This is a good case, but no remedy. That's the problem. What's the remedy? Treason? That case must, as stated in the constitution, be herd in the Senate.
To be more clear. I was asking if SCOTUS got no standing, not the brothers pushing the case :)
Ah, thank you for clearing that up.
and that's perfectly aligned with my question. I just asked it a different way.
Loy Brunson asked "If the oath of office has no teeth, then the constitution has no meaning." This may actually be at the root of what we're asking.
Legal name wargame anyway with so many layers of mental control via color of law.
If you ask me the US has been a corporate vessel of the Crown Corporation in city of London since the act of 1871 but was probably taken long before that even. All the shitty amendments came after the legal municipality in dc took over.
Under duress since then
If the corporation goes bankrupt, does that make the contract invalid/dissolved/Insolvent? How far back can a country's bankruptcy court claw back? Centuries? Does it take a war to cancel the contract? What if we dissolve the currency instead? If there is no Rothschild currency, how can a debt be repaid? Assets? OK, we give you that hell hole DC back. In return, pay us for WW1 and WW2 that we fought on your behalf. Back to reality, If the congress didn't have the authority to enter that contract, how could that contract be valid? They would have entered the contract fraudulently, and fraud vitiates everything.
This is fun!