No sauce, just thoughts. What if a large number of deaths are anticipated in the short term from the vax? What better opportunity would there be to point the finger at chemical companies and greenhouse gas producers. More EPA, more government power, more ESG, no accountability.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Since they are downplaying the incident instead of having a running death count on CNN, sending hazmat people to walk the streets, issuing curfews, force testing, 15 minute cities, etc. It tells me it's a big deal and dangerous. Otherwise they would be using the publicity as distraction for all the other shitty things the government is doing.
They may be targeting spots that got the worst clot shot lots. 🤷
Good thought. I do not believe we are to see deaths weeks after a toxic release. Acute toxicity result in rapid onset of symptoms. This is seconds to hours after exposure.
People here should study Acute vs chronic exposure. Look at terms like AEGL , ERPG, and IDLH. Chronic effects are usually seen months to years after working around a low concentration of a chemical.
Muddying the waters.
My initial thoughts are they could be trying to swing it that way, but we do have a window of recent history that doesn't line up with what they would try to push. If it had been done slowly and gradually, like they probably wanted, it would have been bought by more people. I don't think this would. They've been crying that the sky has been falling for decades and it's falling on deaf ears.
Except the only thing really suffering are amphibians and fish
Have there been reported casualties?
Nope, for this to make sense, there would have to be multiple chemical releases around the country.
I do not believe this release will cause casualties. I believe it may be used as an excuse for future casualties. Weeks to months.
This might give Gates an opportunity to buy up lots of farmland at a fire sale. Especially if this turns out to be a false event or easily remediated.
More likely they are about to crank up the 5G murder weapon.