Great dig OP!! I commented in another thread that all these stats that are being revealed about how "common" and normal it is for derails smells like total B.S. to me. Intentional derails as part of testing exercises doesn't belong in the real data.
There's something sinister behind all these recent occurrences.
It's all good. I was just curious what qualifies as a derailment. I saw the 1000+ someplace else yesterday and I've been wondering what counts ever since.
Great dig OP!! I commented in another thread that all these stats that are being revealed about how "common" and normal it is for derails smells like total B.S. to me. Intentional derails as part of testing exercises doesn't belong in the real data.
There's something sinister behind all these recent occurrences.
If I still had mod privileges, I would sticky this.
Report it and request it on the Other option! I'd do it myself, but this very comment is self-serving enough as it is.
EDIT: Screw it, I did it myself. Better to ask forgiveness than permission.
Do they count it when just a couple axels come off the track without wrecking the train or anything else?
Honestly, I'm not sure.
But I first saw this video several months ago, and recent events brought it back to my memory.
I felt it was worth discussing.
It's all good. I was just curious what qualifies as a derailment. I saw the 1000+ someplace else yesterday and I've been wondering what counts ever since.
How many of them have dangerous chemical spills?