I am sure many of you have read about the Cochrane study on masks. What I find most interesting about it is that most of the msm sources do not denounce it. I googled "cochrane mask study"
Headlines:
The Atlantic - "Somehow, the science on masks still isn't settled" Slate - "Masks Cochrane review: There's still not strong evidence for masks"
The one that stuck out to me went the opposite way and trashed the Cochrane study.
"Yes, masks reduce the risk of spreading COVID, despite a review saying they don't"
Written by GAVI. Many of you are likely aware of GAVI, I was not. GAVI is the vaccine alliance. It's largest single donor is The Gates Foundation. I read GAVI's response above. It attempts to poke holes in Cochrane's methodology. It claims blind controlled studies are not always the best method (this made me laugh out loud). At the end of GAVI's weak attempts to discredit the study they simply write:
"There is strong and consistent evidence for the effectiveness of masks and (even more so) respirators in protecting against respiratory infections. Masks are an important protection against serious infections."
They make this blanket statement with zero sauce. No studies pointing to their conclusion.
My conclusion: We all know that masks do not stop the spread of airborne viruses. We also know that masks were needed to instill fear and make the plandemic look real. The fact that Gates supported GAVI is pro mask makes perfect sense. If your goal is to push "vaccines" you need mask policy. Without masking the sheep won't take the gene therapy.
Why is this important? We can reach the normies with this fact. Most middle of the road normies know masks are useless, we need to connect the dots for them as to why they were pushed. Once they realize this, it will be much easier for them to swallow the red pill that the jab was not created to save them. I convinced a jabbed and boosted friend of this yesterday. The next step is to get them to understand what the goal of the vax was/is. There are really only 3 possibilities:
- to make money
- control the population through medical mandates
- depopulation
My friend said he can believe 1 and 2. I told him if you believe 1 and 2, number 3 is not a big leap. Seed planted.
related substack posted this morning - https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/legitimate-confusion-thursday-february
Mask part begins:
Well Hamlet was struggling with suicide when he remarked similarly.
great article!
Yes this was good.
Some people (the ones who think they are "educated") will only look at peer reviewed studies / publications. Having this will hopefully help in overcoming their support of face diapers. Having said that Im sure many of these maskers will continue to do so....
Good points, and sounds like you have had luck with it. I think most have a problem with point 3 because they don't understand the need for it. Maybe explain their need to depopulate. There is and always has been evil people, but most people are good and decent. Most of Germans were not bad people in the 40's, only a handful were truly evil. This is how it always happens. So, if we understand that these evil demons want full control, they must get the population down to a controllable amount. You just can't have a tyranny if you are totally overwhelmed.
Great point about #3 not being a big leap; if they are willing to demonstrate a complete lack of regard for safety just to make money and/or control the population, they are also reasonably capable of depopulation.