So let me preface this by saying that at this point, I literally am surprised by nothing and the government is guilty of all the things until proven innocent. Not the American attitude, I get it, but I’m talking about government as a group, entity, etc, and not an individual person. They’ve screwed us over time and time again and do not deserve anyone’s “benefit of the doubt”.
Having said that, it’s totally plausible that they’ve lied about all the things in the medical world and we know they’ve hijacked the medical field, education system, and history, just to name a few, in the western world. I also haven’t researched this yet on my own, I’ve just read snippets here and there on GAW. One question that immediately comes to mind is what you said about acquired immunity being a myth. If that’s true, then why do you generally not contract certain things if you’ve had them just once? Some examples would be chicken pox, roseola, measles, mumps, scarlet fever, and the very rare few who survived small pox, and I’m sure there are many more that belong in this category.
However, you can get a cold every year, at least once, for your entire life, and it’s the same for stomach bugs, “the flu”, hand foot and mouth disease (although it’s more rare in adults), as well as a number of other illnesses that I haven’t named. I’m just curious as to what the explanation is in regards to getting some illnesses over and over again, while others it’s a “one and done” kind of thing for a majority of the population.
Thanks for responding ☺️
If that’s true, then why do you generally not contract certain things if you’ve had them just once? Some examples would be chicken pox, roseola, measles, mumps, scarlet fever
Most of these in your list are what occur with children that suffer a separation conflict, typically from their mother. That's why it's mostly kindergarteners and 1st graders who get these. While the child is sad/scared/conflicted, their psyche desensitizes the skin by circumventing and/or destroying certain nerve endings where the child is most accustomed to being touched by their mother (upper body, face, etc) so as to not be constantly reminded of their sadness around this separation from typically the mother when other kids, teachers touch them in these areas while playing or whatever. The rash/bumps/pox occur after the child gets over their separation from mother and the psyche then restores and rebuilds these nerve-endings in the skin. If older kids get chicken pox, by typically going to a "chicken pox party" they actually suffer an "Attack/Feeling-Soiled Conflict" which is the same as adult shingles. This results in the body making deeper adjustments in the dermal skin layer to protect the individual from further attack of this unknown attacker. It's worth noting too, that kids who "get separated" from other kids, like siblings of a child that came down with chicken pox, who aren't allowed to go to school for a few days can also develop a separation conflict from their classmates due to this unfair punishment.
Mumps is caused by an "I can't/Not allowed to eat conflict". The child is prevented from eating a sweet, desert, cake, etc. and doesn't accept or understand why the parent won't allow them to eat it. The psyche interprets this as literally that the child lacks the ability to eat this substance so goes about turbo-boosting the salivary glands to ensure enough saliva is available to breakdown the food so the child doesn't feel like it "can't eat it". Thus, the swollen salivary glands are the conflict active phase of this alleged "viral dis-ease".
and the very rare few who survived small pox
This is a gigantic myth. That a skin rash/pox could actually kill anybody is an absurdity when taken at face value. Most such children who died during these fake scamdemic eras were poisoned to death by the toxic nostrums administered by the compliant doctors of that time. See the Leicester UK study for definitive proof of this. The whole American settlers and "infected blankets" given to Indians is also a gigantic lie to cover for the slaughter of these people. There is one corrollary story of a fur trader moving up and down Colorado where death followed in his wake as he had hired local natives to help with skinning animals and preserving them with highly toxic arsenic. But the "death by small pox" is in large part a gigantic lie to cover for poisoning.
colds and flus (and Covid)...
These are caused by stink conflicts and scare-fright-worry-concern conflicts. All forms of fearful thought/emotion register in the bronchial tubes and lungs as the psyche responds to fearful thoughts by trying to get more oxygen into the body. When the conflict is resolved, the psyche rebuilds the tubes/lungs and this is when we "get sick" during this process where bacteria are actively rebuilding or removing temporary excess tissue.
while others it’s a “one and done” kind of thing for a majority of the population.
Note that most, if not all "One and done viral dis-eases" happen to children exclusively as they are not yet fully adapted and indoctrinated into the insanity they're being subjected to by the adults their surrounded by.
I wrote a number of extremely long articles here on GA a few months ago detailing all the major alleged unicorn-virus dis-eases in great detail. If you're interested, I'll share those links with you.
Rabies -> I ended up not writing this one up as there wasn't much feedback after the above installment. In short, there's no such thing of course. The events attributed to the mythical unicorn-rabies-virus are due to an extremely traumatic event (dog/wild-animal attack) that must be eventually "re-lived" psychologically in order to overcome the trauma. It is during this period of the dis-ease process, which we call an "epileptic crisis". that all seizures, heart attacks, strokes, aneurysms, etc. occur. And in extremely traumatic attacks, the person who suffered such an event and was unable to "bite back" it's attacker, which is a primal urge that still exists in humans today, this causes severe locking of the jaw and throat regions as well as an irrational fear of drinking water simultaneously. And thus, long before Louis the madman Pasteur came along, this condition was known as "Hydrophobia" (fear of water), which was a much more accurate description formed in the 1700-1800s before humanity collapsed into medical IDIOCRACY!!!
And this is why people have "died from rabies" some 10, 20 and even 40 years after the dog/animal attack. When their subconscious determined they were finally able to hopefully cope with it, this restoration process is initiated. Typically, the further away the epicrisis is from the attack, the more likely the person will die as it indicates the event was horrifically terrorizing for the individual, as indeed would be a severe dog or wild animal attack.
Lastly, nobody has ever located/isolated/seen any type of virus, so there are no types known as "zoonotic" or any other flavor other than the unicorn variety. Robert Gallo's electron microscope picture of the "HIV retrovirus" was a pure fraud, as all pictures of viruses are frauds. And this is why no other researcher to this day has ever been able to duplicate Gallo's miraculous isolation of such a creature - because it doesn't exist. He just took a picture of a weird looking particle he saw and named it "HIV" and everyone believed him. That's virology in a nutshell.
So let me preface this by saying that at this point, I literally am surprised by nothing and the government is guilty of all the things until proven innocent. Not the American attitude, I get it, but I’m talking about government as a group, entity, etc, and not an individual person. They’ve screwed us over time and time again and do not deserve anyone’s “benefit of the doubt”.
Having said that, it’s totally plausible that they’ve lied about all the things in the medical world and we know they’ve hijacked the medical field, education system, and history, just to name a few, in the western world. I also haven’t researched this yet on my own, I’ve just read snippets here and there on GAW. One question that immediately comes to mind is what you said about acquired immunity being a myth. If that’s true, then why do you generally not contract certain things if you’ve had them just once? Some examples would be chicken pox, roseola, measles, mumps, scarlet fever, and the very rare few who survived small pox, and I’m sure there are many more that belong in this category.
However, you can get a cold every year, at least once, for your entire life, and it’s the same for stomach bugs, “the flu”, hand foot and mouth disease (although it’s more rare in adults), as well as a number of other illnesses that I haven’t named. I’m just curious as to what the explanation is in regards to getting some illnesses over and over again, while others it’s a “one and done” kind of thing for a majority of the population. Thanks for responding ☺️
Good questions, thanks for asking...
Most of these in your list are what occur with children that suffer a separation conflict, typically from their mother. That's why it's mostly kindergarteners and 1st graders who get these. While the child is sad/scared/conflicted, their psyche desensitizes the skin by circumventing and/or destroying certain nerve endings where the child is most accustomed to being touched by their mother (upper body, face, etc) so as to not be constantly reminded of their sadness around this separation from typically the mother when other kids, teachers touch them in these areas while playing or whatever. The rash/bumps/pox occur after the child gets over their separation from mother and the psyche then restores and rebuilds these nerve-endings in the skin. If older kids get chicken pox, by typically going to a "chicken pox party" they actually suffer an "Attack/Feeling-Soiled Conflict" which is the same as adult shingles. This results in the body making deeper adjustments in the dermal skin layer to protect the individual from further attack of this unknown attacker. It's worth noting too, that kids who "get separated" from other kids, like siblings of a child that came down with chicken pox, who aren't allowed to go to school for a few days can also develop a separation conflict from their classmates due to this unfair punishment.
Mumps is caused by an "I can't/Not allowed to eat conflict". The child is prevented from eating a sweet, desert, cake, etc. and doesn't accept or understand why the parent won't allow them to eat it. The psyche interprets this as literally that the child lacks the ability to eat this substance so goes about turbo-boosting the salivary glands to ensure enough saliva is available to breakdown the food so the child doesn't feel like it "can't eat it". Thus, the swollen salivary glands are the conflict active phase of this alleged "viral dis-ease".
This is a gigantic myth. That a skin rash/pox could actually kill anybody is an absurdity when taken at face value. Most such children who died during these fake scamdemic eras were poisoned to death by the toxic nostrums administered by the compliant doctors of that time. See the Leicester UK study for definitive proof of this. The whole American settlers and "infected blankets" given to Indians is also a gigantic lie to cover for the slaughter of these people. There is one corrollary story of a fur trader moving up and down Colorado where death followed in his wake as he had hired local natives to help with skinning animals and preserving them with highly toxic arsenic. But the "death by small pox" is in large part a gigantic lie to cover for poisoning.
These are caused by stink conflicts and scare-fright-worry-concern conflicts. All forms of fearful thought/emotion register in the bronchial tubes and lungs as the psyche responds to fearful thoughts by trying to get more oxygen into the body. When the conflict is resolved, the psyche rebuilds the tubes/lungs and this is when we "get sick" during this process where bacteria are actively rebuilding or removing temporary excess tissue.
Note that most, if not all "One and done viral dis-eases" happen to children exclusively as they are not yet fully adapted and indoctrinated into the insanity they're being subjected to by the adults their surrounded by.
I wrote a number of extremely long articles here on GA a few months ago detailing all the major alleged unicorn-virus dis-eases in great detail. If you're interested, I'll share those links with you.
Thanks for your questions!
What about zoonotic viruses like rabies or HIV
HIV -> https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqKnzYZD/unleashed-special-editionisland-/
Rabies -> I ended up not writing this one up as there wasn't much feedback after the above installment. In short, there's no such thing of course. The events attributed to the mythical unicorn-rabies-virus are due to an extremely traumatic event (dog/wild-animal attack) that must be eventually "re-lived" psychologically in order to overcome the trauma. It is during this period of the dis-ease process, which we call an "epileptic crisis". that all seizures, heart attacks, strokes, aneurysms, etc. occur. And in extremely traumatic attacks, the person who suffered such an event and was unable to "bite back" it's attacker, which is a primal urge that still exists in humans today, this causes severe locking of the jaw and throat regions as well as an irrational fear of drinking water simultaneously. And thus, long before Louis the madman Pasteur came along, this condition was known as "Hydrophobia" (fear of water), which was a much more accurate description formed in the 1700-1800s before humanity collapsed into medical IDIOCRACY!!!
And this is why people have "died from rabies" some 10, 20 and even 40 years after the dog/animal attack. When their subconscious determined they were finally able to hopefully cope with it, this restoration process is initiated. Typically, the further away the epicrisis is from the attack, the more likely the person will die as it indicates the event was horrifically terrorizing for the individual, as indeed would be a severe dog or wild animal attack.
Lastly, nobody has ever located/isolated/seen any type of virus, so there are no types known as "zoonotic" or any other flavor other than the unicorn variety. Robert Gallo's electron microscope picture of the "HIV retrovirus" was a pure fraud, as all pictures of viruses are frauds. And this is why no other researcher to this day has ever been able to duplicate Gallo's miraculous isolation of such a creature - because it doesn't exist. He just took a picture of a weird looking particle he saw and named it "HIV" and everyone believed him. That's virology in a nutshell.
Thanks for asking!