Funny enough it was a buddy of mine who insisted bacteria/viruses weren’t real but he was very bad at explaining. While I am forced to disagree in some areas due to my own lived experiences in emergency medicine and sepsis in general, I don’t discount other peoples lived experience and knowledge, and what you wrote was a very interesting well thought out read. I don’t disagree with you totally is why it’s so interesting, mental affect towards an injury or illness is well known to influence recovery even amongst mainstream medicine. There is more to that than most in my profession care to admit, and I do think positive thoughts brings about a positive wellbeing in a full body health kind of way. Thanks for the reply!
Well we can see sepsis in babies and children for one, it’s certainly not limited to those who have been sick and worried and afraid for years, but in my experience hits those with the weakest “immune system” as it were. Ie: the very young the very old and those with known immune deficiencies. The old I can surmise from your writings, but not so much the young.
I see. I appreciate the clarification. Here are my thoughts:
The young (pre egoic download, age 3-4) absorb the currents of thought from their mother/caretaker/surroundings, be it negative, positive, loving, fearful, etc. Should they spend lengthy periods in hospitals, they absorb the thought of the sick and infirm around them, as well as the worry/concern of the nurses doctors tending to them. Thus, they are highly susceptible to "take on" these worries they are enmeshed in.
Technically, we all absorb the currents of thought from the people and surroundings we place ourselves in. It's just that adults have developed stronger powers to resist the lower thought-currents when exposed to them, while the child is still an innocent babe in the woods yet unable to defend itself on this level.
Should the young child be reared in a disruptive home environment, filled with discordant thought and vibration, they are like innocent sponges and are highly vulnerable to a whole host of "Mysterious" ailments, which are all bundled into the non-existence, fraudulent, entirely unproven "immune deficiency" category, which is, in reality, a meaningless diagnosis lacking a shred of scientific evidence to back it up.
One of the most common clients I've worked with the past few years are middle-aged women diagnosed with "lyme dis-ease". Utter poppycock. All but one has fully released her symptoms once she understood the cause (self-devaluation, most frequently due to feelings of loss of beauty/attractiveness).
But I appreciate your comments. I'll be sure to include some comments on the young with future questioners. Thank you for helping me get better at what I do. I appreciate it!
Funny enough it was a buddy of mine who insisted bacteria/viruses weren’t real but he was very bad at explaining. While I am forced to disagree in some areas due to my own lived experiences in emergency medicine and sepsis in general, I don’t discount other peoples lived experience and knowledge, and what you wrote was a very interesting well thought out read. I don’t disagree with you totally is why it’s so interesting, mental affect towards an injury or illness is well known to influence recovery even amongst mainstream medicine. There is more to that than most in my profession care to admit, and I do think positive thoughts brings about a positive wellbeing in a full body health kind of way. Thanks for the reply!
May I ask which parts you disagree with, so I can better formulate my explanations and or do more in depth research in the future?
Well we can see sepsis in babies and children for one, it’s certainly not limited to those who have been sick and worried and afraid for years, but in my experience hits those with the weakest “immune system” as it were. Ie: the very young the very old and those with known immune deficiencies. The old I can surmise from your writings, but not so much the young.
I see. I appreciate the clarification. Here are my thoughts:
The young (pre egoic download, age 3-4) absorb the currents of thought from their mother/caretaker/surroundings, be it negative, positive, loving, fearful, etc. Should they spend lengthy periods in hospitals, they absorb the thought of the sick and infirm around them, as well as the worry/concern of the nurses doctors tending to them. Thus, they are highly susceptible to "take on" these worries they are enmeshed in.
Technically, we all absorb the currents of thought from the people and surroundings we place ourselves in. It's just that adults have developed stronger powers to resist the lower thought-currents when exposed to them, while the child is still an innocent babe in the woods yet unable to defend itself on this level.
Should the young child be reared in a disruptive home environment, filled with discordant thought and vibration, they are like innocent sponges and are highly vulnerable to a whole host of "Mysterious" ailments, which are all bundled into the non-existence, fraudulent, entirely unproven "immune deficiency" category, which is, in reality, a meaningless diagnosis lacking a shred of scientific evidence to back it up.
One of the most common clients I've worked with the past few years are middle-aged women diagnosed with "lyme dis-ease". Utter poppycock. All but one has fully released her symptoms once she understood the cause (self-devaluation, most frequently due to feelings of loss of beauty/attractiveness).
But I appreciate your comments. I'll be sure to include some comments on the young with future questioners. Thank you for helping me get better at what I do. I appreciate it!