Thoughts? Too far out there?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
You call what happened in Ohio localized!? That stuff went everywhere in the smoke and into the groundwater, the Ohio River, etc. It's going to get into the food and bioaccumulate in plants and animals all the way up the food chain and then how many places around the country get food distributed from that region? By the time it starts showing up and causing cancer in humans, it will be impossible to trace it back to this event.
Okay, you are now proving my point that this event is not going to provide cover for cancer caused by vaccines since (which was the thesis of the post), as you correctly observed, it will be impossible to trace it back to this event.
Yes and that's why it will provide cover. Because a sharp rise in cancer cases can easily be blamed on the chemical spills when a large percentage may actually be due to the jabs.
And we don't expect the government to distinguish between types of cancer, geographics or anything relevant, do we? They will cherry pick whatever data they need to support their propaganda.
Which is it?
or
I'm saying it would be impossible to conduct rigorous research to conclusively trace the cause to a specific event, but in the aggregate data there would still be a sharp rise in cancer which the government will just say it's due to hazmat exposure and ignore all the jab damage.