Outside of going undercover and a Pfizer director talking about engaging in gain of function.... I mean directed evolution, and O'keefe and team getting assaulted by the jerk as he shows the world how Pfizer loves to hire management that are highly unstable and of no moral or ethical character, what could we point to to say was wrong in what O'Keefe did?
If the Pfizer sting operation requires corrective action that would mean no more actual investigative undercover journalism or it would mean there is a no go list of topics or targets. In either case, project veritas becomes a useless entity no longer serving the purpose of it's creation. So best that it die sooner than later and people redirect their donations to the soon to come spiritual successor to the original entity.
The board may be intimidated cowards, but James is not. This is not an issue he would fall on his sword for. In fact, I believe he would welcome the conflict. Imagine discovery for a trial?
they bare probably saying they fired him instead of him quitting, thing is, you cannot separate James and the people actually paying the bills, and you know daggone well Everyone here for example would not give to PV without James
So, this means that any subsequent Pfizer exposes and whatever PV has in the pipeline are retained property of the PV board, right? Maybe Pfizer is terrified of whatever else James got video of.
Corrective of what?
Outside of going undercover and a Pfizer director talking about engaging in gain of function.... I mean directed evolution, and O'keefe and team getting assaulted by the jerk as he shows the world how Pfizer loves to hire management that are highly unstable and of no moral or ethical character, what could we point to to say was wrong in what O'Keefe did?
If the Pfizer sting operation requires corrective action that would mean no more actual investigative undercover journalism or it would mean there is a no go list of topics or targets. In either case, project veritas becomes a useless entity no longer serving the purpose of it's creation. So best that it die sooner than later and people redirect their donations to the soon to come spiritual successor to the original entity.
The board may be intimidated cowards, but James is not. This is not an issue he would fall on his sword for. In fact, I believe he would welcome the conflict. Imagine discovery for a trial?
they bare probably saying they fired him instead of him quitting, thing is, you cannot separate James and the people actually paying the bills, and you know daggone well Everyone here for example would not give to PV without James
They had a spine. Now they are like a jellyfish on the beach. Nothing will be left and no one will care.
So, this means that any subsequent Pfizer exposes and whatever PV has in the pipeline are retained property of the PV board, right? Maybe Pfizer is terrified of whatever else James got video of.