To correct your analogy, this is like predicting that a golfer is going to miss a hole in one twice in a row, and being correct both times.
Except the Brunson case was more like getting a hole in one on all 18 holes. Anyone with a shred of common sense knows it’s not going to happen.
Overturning Roe v Wade was awesome, but outside of that the SC has not ruled in our favor very consistently, or for that matter very much at all. Counting on them or any other branch of the govt to save you or work in your favor is utter foolishness.
My point is that it's incredibly easy to predict that someone will not get a hold in one twice in a row. You really shouldn't derive any pride from "calling it" that SCOTUS did not remove hundreds of members from congress and save the world.
Because zero people thought that would happen. Even the Brunsons themselves. But that doesn't mean you don't try.
Called it. Some people here and on PDW get way too excited over obvious dead ends like this.
That's like saying, "he's not going to hit a hole in one on this hole, watch!"
After he swings you exclaim, "called it!"
To correct your analogy, this is like predicting that a golfer is going to miss a hole in one twice in a row, and being correct both times.
Except the Brunson case was more like getting a hole in one on all 18 holes. Anyone with a shred of common sense knows it’s not going to happen.
Overturning Roe v Wade was awesome, but outside of that the SC has not ruled in our favor very consistently, or for that matter very much at all. Counting on them or any other branch of the govt to save you or work in your favor is utter foolishness.
My point is that it's incredibly easy to predict that someone will not get a hold in one twice in a row. You really shouldn't derive any pride from "calling it" that SCOTUS did not remove hundreds of members from congress and save the world.
Because zero people thought that would happen. Even the Brunsons themselves. But that doesn't mean you don't try.