To correct your analogy, this is like predicting that a golfer is going to miss a hole in one twice in a row, and being correct both times.
Except the Brunson case was more like getting a hole in one on all 18 holes. Anyone with a shred of common sense knows it’s not going to happen.
Overturning Roe v Wade was awesome, but outside of that the SC has not ruled in our favor very consistently, or for that matter very much at all. Counting on them or any other branch of the govt to save you or work in your favor is utter foolishness.
My point is that it's incredibly easy to predict that someone will not get a hold in one twice in a row. You really shouldn't derive any pride from "calling it" that SCOTUS did not remove hundreds of members from congress and save the world.
Because zero people thought that would happen. Even the Brunsons themselves. But that doesn't mean you don't try.
To correct your analogy, this is like predicting that a golfer is going to miss a hole in one twice in a row, and being correct both times.
Except the Brunson case was more like getting a hole in one on all 18 holes. Anyone with a shred of common sense knows it’s not going to happen.
Overturning Roe v Wade was awesome, but outside of that the SC has not ruled in our favor very consistently, or for that matter very much at all. Counting on them or any other branch of the govt to save you or work in your favor is utter foolishness.
My point is that it's incredibly easy to predict that someone will not get a hold in one twice in a row. You really shouldn't derive any pride from "calling it" that SCOTUS did not remove hundreds of members from congress and save the world.
Because zero people thought that would happen. Even the Brunsons themselves. But that doesn't mean you don't try.