Anon is not wrong. Additionally, it's not the jannies fault persay either. They can't help that one or two of them keep falling for the same old cheese in the same old mousetrap...
Your link just shows people being hopeful about it. Almost nobody would have bet even money that SCOTUS was about to save the world and remove hundreds of people from congress, etc.
But there's nothing wrong with hoping. Nothing wrong with posting updates about the case. Nothing wrong with discussing the case. For some reason any talking about this case is shamed.
That link is the aggregated search for "Brunson" across the win-verse.
It's figuratively an archived timeline, which paints a very different picture than how you simplify and lump together very different anon opinions and positions.
To your second point, yep agreed, nothing wrong with hoping. But something is very wrong with deriving hope from known disinformation paytriot streams.
How many times does Ward, Nino, Herms, Savin, Parkes, Santa, et al need to rope you folks along (cashing in the whole ride to boot) before you realize the elephant in the room: if these faggots are promoting or prophecizing anything, then it's a load of hot garbage
This has to be one of the largest snake hopium grifts we’ve seen yet. No serious legal mind would actually think that principles of contract and tort law are applicable to the certification of the electoral college. And that is a huge part of the issue.
Jim Bob Cooter Brunson & fellow snake hopium vendors did a fairly good job of hiding the grift. Memory is a bit foggy on this, but my recollection is fairly damn close if not totally accurate - the complaint was like 24 pages long, and the first 19 pages were a long winded rant illustrating various egregious shenanigans in the 2020 election. I might take issue with the way they characterized some of the shenanigans, but overall I don’t really disagree with the sentiment. However…
When you get to the meat and potatoes, these fags actually tried making claims arising out of contract and tort law. And they did a piss poor job of it. The average guy has no idea how to read a lawsuit. So they think that the first 19 pages are the causes of action. But they are not. Just a long winded diatribe that is not really consequential to what the court is tasked with sorting through.
So what happens here when you attempt to point that out? You get down voted into oblivion. Because people are so righteously pissed off about what happened in 2020, and they never got past the first 19 pages of the bullshit complaint. So they think that SCOTUS has some viable claim that they can do something with. When it is actually the exact opposite. The only thing somewhat amusing about the entire charade is that several cucked judges and their clerks had to figure out the most expedient way of taking out the trash. And that gives me a little bit of joy, because 90% of the judges on either the state or the federal bench are just asshats. It’s rather awesome to think about them having to waste their damn time dealing with this.
But ffs, nobody should be giving these clowns money. In fact, as a pro se plaintiff, what real costs do these guys have besides filing fees? There should be no reason for them to need money; unless of course the entire purpose was fund raising…If they basically had to quit working in order to manage this case, that’s on them. A real lawyer would have less than a weeks worth of billable hours on this case. Stop sending money to anyone asking who has not produced. That is a fairly safe rule of thumb.
Oh, but there was.
Anon is not wrong. Additionally, it's not the jannies fault persay either. They can't help that one or two of them keep falling for the same old cheese in the same old mousetrap...
Your link just shows people being hopeful about it. Almost nobody would have bet even money that SCOTUS was about to save the world and remove hundreds of people from congress, etc.
But there's nothing wrong with hoping. Nothing wrong with posting updates about the case. Nothing wrong with discussing the case. For some reason any talking about this case is shamed.
No.
That link is the aggregated search for "Brunson" across the win-verse.
It's figuratively an archived timeline, which paints a very different picture than how you simplify and lump together very different anon opinions and positions.
To your second point, yep agreed, nothing wrong with hoping. But something is very wrong with deriving hope from known disinformation paytriot streams.
How many times does Ward, Nino, Herms, Savin, Parkes, Santa, et al need to rope you folks along (cashing in the whole ride to boot) before you realize the elephant in the room: if these faggots are promoting or prophecizing anything, then it's a load of hot garbage
This has to be one of the largest snake hopium grifts we’ve seen yet. No serious legal mind would actually think that principles of contract and tort law are applicable to the certification of the electoral college. And that is a huge part of the issue.
Jim Bob Cooter Brunson & fellow snake hopium vendors did a fairly good job of hiding the grift. Memory is a bit foggy on this, but my recollection is fairly damn close if not totally accurate - the complaint was like 24 pages long, and the first 19 pages were a long winded rant illustrating various egregious shenanigans in the 2020 election. I might take issue with the way they characterized some of the shenanigans, but overall I don’t really disagree with the sentiment. However…
When you get to the meat and potatoes, these fags actually tried making claims arising out of contract and tort law. And they did a piss poor job of it. The average guy has no idea how to read a lawsuit. So they think that the first 19 pages are the causes of action. But they are not. Just a long winded diatribe that is not really consequential to what the court is tasked with sorting through.
So what happens here when you attempt to point that out? You get down voted into oblivion. Because people are so righteously pissed off about what happened in 2020, and they never got past the first 19 pages of the bullshit complaint. So they think that SCOTUS has some viable claim that they can do something with. When it is actually the exact opposite. The only thing somewhat amusing about the entire charade is that several cucked judges and their clerks had to figure out the most expedient way of taking out the trash. And that gives me a little bit of joy, because 90% of the judges on either the state or the federal bench are just asshats. It’s rather awesome to think about them having to waste their damn time dealing with this.
But ffs, nobody should be giving these clowns money. In fact, as a pro se plaintiff, what real costs do these guys have besides filing fees? There should be no reason for them to need money; unless of course the entire purpose was fund raising…If they basically had to quit working in order to manage this case, that’s on them. A real lawyer would have less than a weeks worth of billable hours on this case. Stop sending money to anyone asking who has not produced. That is a fairly safe rule of thumb.
People here don't really ever learn from the endless paytriot gifting