Yes. And back then was there talk of a machine that could cause earthquakes?
If there is a machine that can in fact cause earthquakes now, and that can be proven, and the timing of this particular earthquake is suspect for the reasons cited in this thread, where do you get off being so dismissive? What's your angle? We question everything on this sub. You think cause you took seismology in college that nobody is allowed to question the cause of earthquakes now? What the fuck is wrong with you?
If there is a secret society of gnomes who can cause earthquakes, and that can be proven, and the timing...etc. Of course, the problem with this "if" is that it is only an if, there is no proof, and the rest of it is nonsense. You question everything but your own zany fantasies. Your whole response to anyone who knows anything is "What the fuck do you know?" Evidently, more than you.
You have an explanation for the cause of earthquakes? Publish it and get a Nobel Prize in physics or geology. There have been earthquakes since before technology.
And by the way, when Mount St. Helens was erupting (which took place over a span of 2 months), nobody dreamed about the possibility of "earthquake machines." We were watching nature in action, at a scale no machine could match. Frankly, your "machine" idea would have been rightly regarded as lunacy.
Always excellent. Gnomes are more believable than "earthquake machines" (not that they are at all believable). Actually, Mother Nature is most believable.
Yeah dude. Nobody denies that mother nature causes earthquakes, just like nobody denies she causes thunderstorms. But in addition to that, there seems to be a lot of information coming out lately that suggest that clouds can in fact be seeded, and yes, giant resonance machines can also trigger earthquakes. Why is that such a stretch to you that you think your condescending tone is warranted? We live in a world where we figured out a way to split a plutonium atom to blow up a city but human beings triggering an earthquake along a fault line with another form of technology is unthinkable?
Why are you even here? Are you just a PDW troll here to dismiss everything that doesn't sound like Fox News common sense from 2005? Or did you just get an A in freshman Geology and are eager to show off all the stuff you memorized from the book you took completely on faith in the first place?
By the way, I also got in A in freshman Geology, but for some reason it didn't turn me into a closed-minded asshole. Maybe you're just cooler than me.
Yes. And back then was there talk of a machine that could cause earthquakes?
If there is a machine that can in fact cause earthquakes now, and that can be proven, and the timing of this particular earthquake is suspect for the reasons cited in this thread, where do you get off being so dismissive? What's your angle? We question everything on this sub. You think cause you took seismology in college that nobody is allowed to question the cause of earthquakes now? What the fuck is wrong with you?
If there is a secret society of gnomes who can cause earthquakes, and that can be proven, and the timing...etc. Of course, the problem with this "if" is that it is only an if, there is no proof, and the rest of it is nonsense. You question everything but your own zany fantasies. Your whole response to anyone who knows anything is "What the fuck do you know?" Evidently, more than you.
You have an explanation for the cause of earthquakes? Publish it and get a Nobel Prize in physics or geology. There have been earthquakes since before technology.
And by the way, when Mount St. Helens was erupting (which took place over a span of 2 months), nobody dreamed about the possibility of "earthquake machines." We were watching nature in action, at a scale no machine could match. Frankly, your "machine" idea would have been rightly regarded as lunacy.
Oh God. He's still talking about gnomes.
You have a good day, kiddo.
Always excellent. Gnomes are more believable than "earthquake machines" (not that they are at all believable). Actually, Mother Nature is most believable.
Yeah dude. Nobody denies that mother nature causes earthquakes, just like nobody denies she causes thunderstorms. But in addition to that, there seems to be a lot of information coming out lately that suggest that clouds can in fact be seeded, and yes, giant resonance machines can also trigger earthquakes. Why is that such a stretch to you that you think your condescending tone is warranted? We live in a world where we figured out a way to split a plutonium atom to blow up a city but human beings triggering an earthquake along a fault line with another form of technology is unthinkable?
Why are you even here? Are you just a PDW troll here to dismiss everything that doesn't sound like Fox News common sense from 2005? Or did you just get an A in freshman Geology and are eager to show off all the stuff you memorized from the book you took completely on faith in the first place?
By the way, I also got in A in freshman Geology, but for some reason it didn't turn me into a closed-minded asshole. Maybe you're just cooler than me.