IT'S BAD, FOLKS: The WHO Treaty Is Tied to a Global Digital Passport and ID System
(brownstone.org)
BREAKING
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
DO NOT BE FOOLED. They want us focusing on the treaty, which has to be ratified by Congress. This is a distraction. The real problem is the amendments to the International Health Regulations set to be voted on very soon. The US is already a signatory nation to the IHR. That means that the amendments can be ratified by a simple majority. These amendments, submitted by the Biden administration over a weekend in secret, gives the WHO enforcement powers under a health emergency declaration - which can be called for pretty much anything by the head of the WHO. No other vote is needed. One person gets to make the call for the entire world. It is an end around to national sovereignty. The WHO will be given the power to sanction in order to enforce actions deemed necessary among other powers. The world health treaty that is being developed is taking the focus away from the real power grab - the IHR.
The only answer to this if it cannot be stopped in its tracks, is to withdraw from the WHO. Since Trump knew what was coming he tried to get us out of the WHO. Now it is up to us. Just like when this first came on the radar last year, sunlight made it go back into its corner. Lots of attention and noise made it retreat. We must do the same again. Wonder why there are so many distractions? This is huge and they don't want us looking at it. If there is a time to blow up the phone lines to Congress and your State representatives, this is it. But understand, this not about that damn treaty - it's about the amendments to the IHR. Make sure we get this straight!
I'm wondering what the fuck were supposed to do about any of this. Are we really supposed to believe phone calls will stop their global domination plan?
If Trump got us out why did the white hats let Biden put us back in?
WHO are these supposed white hats and what makes any of us think that because they are not the "black hats" that it means they are on OUR side? White hats and black hats are just two sides of same faction that are infighting over control of US and to gain control of being the ones to sit at the big table.
The last time these amendments came up, a whole lot of attention made them back off. Otherwise they would have moved forward last year. They do not want attention on this. What little attention was generated last year was enough for these slimy creatures to crawl back under their rocks. A couple of African nations put the kabash on them moving forward. They tried again and introduced the amendments over a weekend in secret. However, people who are closely monitoring their moves found out. The only way this will be halted is if eyes are put on it. Every little bit helps.
You can believe that "white hats" are "in control." If that were true, we would not be in the shit storm that is taking place. We are the plan fren and we always were. Yes, we have friendlies on the inside. But they are not enough to pull this out of the fire alone. Everyone is needed on the battlefield. This is war, and with war, there are battles. Some battles are won, and some battles are lost. It is moves and countermoves. When we lose a fight, we pick ourselves up and reengage the enemy. They are not going to stop moving forward with their plans unless we stop them - wherever we can. Quitting is not an option. Stand and fight where you are, doing what you can. Every soldier is valuable, and every soldier is needed. When we think that our efforts are meaningless, they have already won. Best to you fren.
The COVID emergency is set to expire in May. The WHO must have another health emergency lined up. I've looked for WHO enforcement mechanisms, but I can't find anything more specific than sanctions, which I assume would be economic or financial. This may work for different countries, but how could it work against individual US states?
There is also wording in these amendments that can take over portions of industry in order to mobilize them against whatever "health threat" that the director of the WHO deems necessary. It can be a plandemic or it can be climate change. The emergency is basically anything he says it is. These changes also move the WHO from being an advisor to essentially a global governance mechanism with powers. Sanctions for non compliance could be heavy.
The plandemic already showed us how these elitists are willing to move in lockstep to oppress the people using threats of sanction. Threaten a state with cutting off Federal funding and that gets their attention pretty quick. All state governments rely heavily on Federal block grants and other forms of reimbursements. What would a state do if Medicaid or Medicare reimbursements were threatened? Federal education funding could be cut. The list is large and withholding could bring any state to its knees in a very short time.
The existing language for human dignity and human rights will also be completely removed. The thought of where this could lead if they get their way is frightening. This move could possibly be the mechanism that they will use to bring the entire world into compliance with their global plan. From an evil planning position, it is brilliant. They are trying to sneak these changes in under the radar. In fact, the only reason some of us even know about these amendments is because a few determined people dug through the WHO's proceedings and were able to track it down. It has not been easy. They do not want us to know. That is why they are trying to get everyone to focus on a new international health treaty. The treaty is a decoy. Americans that are aware that something is brewing are not concerned because they assume it involves the treaty - which they know would probably never get past Congress. The amendments to the IHR are not even on their radar so they blow it off. There is a reason Trump was pulling us out of the WHO. He knew what was coming.
Right. They are cunning and relentless. That was my response to a thread revealing that the Omnibus Bill contains a clause allowing the FDA to ban off-label prescribing because the FDA keeps losing in court on the issue. They will never stop.
Yes, off label prescribing is a huge part of practice. You have a toolbox and you use what is in your toolbox to find the right fit for your patient. If bean counters and AI are going to determine patient care and not the clinician, why the hell have a provider? Myself and some of my colleagues tried to warn others about where this was all headed when the ACA was passed. Of course we were not taken seriously. It has been incremental steps to essentially strip autonomy away from providers and turn us into robots following one size fits all treatment algorithms. The ICD codes are a minefield. I sidelined myself when the Rona hit. I still have my license, but trying to actually treat patients in this climate is next to impossible. I have been around long enough to know what it used to be like. The younger practitioners don't know anything different than this new system. Maybe someday when the madness is over, there will be room for us to bring some sanity back. Until then, I will find other places where I can be of service.
Fren, I'm afraid you are not understanding how the Government really works. They sign or pass whatever they want and that's the law until a Court orders them to halt pending review and ultimately rules against them or lifts the halt. Which means we need a Court to force them to follow the Constitution. Our election fraud cases do not instill me with much confidence in the Courts.
I think you misunderstand fren. This takeover is taking place at the WHO, not from within the US government. The amendments given by the US to the WHO are to make major changes to the IHR of which the US is a member nation and a signatory. Since the IHR has already been approved by most of the member nations and is already in effect, any changes to the already existing IHR only requires a simple majority. The US government has little to do with this vote taking place in May other than our rep to the WHO trying to make sure this damn thing gets shoved through while everyone is focused on a treaty. The fact that this is completely bypassing our government is what makes it very dangerous. It is an end around to a one world government framework using the WHO.
It was specifically constructed in an attempt to end run around the Constitution's requirement for the advice and consent of the Senate on treaties. The Senate will sue and we'll see who the Courts side with. I'm not expecting it will be us.
The longer this thing plays out the more we get stripped from us and I fear for what we'll have left. A major purge of our governments, corporations, and non-profits, must occur, but beyond that a major purge of who lives in this Country must occur and I can't see a way where that can happen without some "really bad things" going down.
It is a change to an already agreed upon treaty - not a new treaty that would need Senate approval/advice and consent. All that is needed to change the International Health Regulations is a simple majority. That's it.
There are two things making their way through the WHO right now. One is the new proposed pandemic treaty that would require the normal process of approval for a treaty. Because people are making the assumption that this is all the WHO is trying to push through, many are not paying attention. What is occuring along side of the new treaty are changes to the existing IHR. The changes to the IHR currently is where they are trying to get their power grab through while everyone is focused on the treaty. The new treaty can be shot down later. But the changes to the IHR needs to be stopped now.
URGENT NEW PANDEMIC TREATY WOULD GIVE WHO UNPRECEDENTED POWER GRAB