911 Where is the Plane wreckage?
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Don't believe your lying eyes is my take on it. Google "whale in gym" or "hologram fashion show"....you think the Pentagon isn't far greater advanced in this technology?....what other excuse is there for no airplane debris? Google airplane crashes on the ground....see all the parts and debris....there was none in the Pennsylvania photos...google it....none....just a hole in the ground...impossible that the debris would have disintegrated into thin air. Problem is, no one wants to think about what would have happened to the passengers who boarded those planes and the ability to think critically caves...and normalcy bias kicks in, it's safer not to have to think 'we' are capable of such things.
The Pennsylvania crash produced a large hole into which the plane had plowed. There was wreckage and debris. It was buried in a memorial. It is remarkable how much a plane will disintegrate upon a hard crash. The establishment of a memorial is wholly at odds with your presumption that someone wanted this to be a non-memory.
I saw no 'wreckage' in the PA 'hole' in any photograph that was taken. Look again. Plane wreckage, by law, is collected and reconstructed. There was nothing to collect or reconstruct....from ANY of the crash sites! That's an impossibility....especially from PA and the Pentagon. There are innumerable 9/11 'memorials'. I can't even stomach watching or listening to anything said by our government "in memory" of the people they killed. IMO it was a false flag event where MANY were killed and others were blamed...THAT is the memory they want kept alive.
They got wreckage and pieces from the Twin Towers. They got wreckage and pieces from the Pentagon. They even got wreckage from Pennsylvania, but it is now buried. (It looks like Flight 93 may have gone to ground at a steep angle, mostly burying itself.) Reconstruction is normally pursued in order to deduce what caused an accident. Since there was nothing accidental about any of these collisions, and the pieces had been so thoroughly torn up, there wouldn't have been much point in attempting a reconstruction.
There is only one Pennsylvania memorial and it does display artifacts remaining from the passengers and fragments of the airplane.
You have a LOT to prove, with evidence, that the government was responsible. That may even be true, but just having an opinion is pretty worthless.
Well, believe it or not, I'm sticking by my "worthless" opinion. I've watched and listened to plenty of videos by experts and professionals to question the 'official' story and, as scary as where that conclusion takes me, I can no longer be convinced actual planes were involved.
That "large hole" supposedly produced by Flight 93 pre-existed the crash. Quite the "coincidence", wouldn't you say, for a plane to fall out of the sky into a pre-existing crater? lol
And who says it pre-existed? A conspiracy enthusiast?