First of all, I got saved at Vacation Bible School around 1980-81.... known and loved God all my life. I could tell you story after story of how He's loved and saved me. Second, this movie, above all else, just shows people experiencing that same love and joy. You could feel the family of God around you in the theatre quietly lifting up their hearts in praise as they were seeing their own stories shown on screen.
This is not another cheesy hybrid Hallmark Christian film. It's beautifully done and probably the best movie I've ever seen.
Many hearts will be touched by the simple message. I kept waiting for Hollywood's message of SELF as God to creep in, but it didn't. Just an amazing film. Light, funny at times, and very uplifting.
What you write here resonates with me. I think it's very important.
However, there is a distinction that I believe is critical, and it revolves around the nature of love and the position of love in the universe.
Love is like a seed. It's has all the direction it needs in its potential to grow, but it must be fed, and it must grow correctly.
Like all things, the capacity to love grows through effort, action and experience. Critically, that capacity to love - if we call that 'heart' - needs to grow properly in alignment with truth. Here, truth being not a doctrinal creation or understanding, but the transcendental principles by which God created us and the universe.
(Teachings, including doctrines, are efforts to describe and lead a person to truth, to experience truth, and live in alignment with truth, but they are not the truth itself. For example, the Bible is not 'the truth'. Rather, it testifies to the truth. Who or what is the truth? The (transcendental) word of God, and it is perfected and made real in the corporeal world via Jesus, the word become flesh. Thus, Jesus is the way, the truth and the life.)
In any case, the capacity to love must grow from an immature state to a mature state. The fulfillment of love growing in alignment with truth is unity with God. That's the door what Jesus opens up (himself being that doorway). Love is the ultimate creative force; it is God's own nature.
If love and the capacity to love does NOT grow in alignment with truth, it becomes corrupted and a destructive force. Thus, there is 'true love', which is love in alignment with Truth, and there is false or fallen love, which is love aligned with lies.
That's the distinction that needs most to be understood. That is the separation point between good and evil; true love vs false love. True love motivates the heart to give, to sacrifice for others, to live for others. Such love manifests in all the virtues you enumerated.
False love, however, turns the heart inward on itself. It pushes the person to sacrifice others for the sake of his or her own desire. It makes a higher priority of self than other.
All of us a mixture of true love and false love. But we can see the corruption of the lies of the devil in how love has been degraded so much today. The entire LGBTQIP phenomenon is pulling so many people towards destruction, because they think "love wins" (e.g. when Gay Marriage becomes a state-sponsored function), but in fact, it's false love.
True love pushes us towards God, resonates more and more with the Truth, and leads us to embody the same nature that Jesus perfected.
Distinguishing between true love and false love is possibly the most critical issue facing the human race. Evil has always attempted to corrupt and distort the creative power of love, all centering on itself, whereas God has continually striven to purify the heart, such that true love can blossom and grow to bear true fruit.
Such a distinction may seem obvious to some, but consider how many churches and believers are falling into the trap of "love is love", without recognizing how destruction such 'love' is. Ultimately, now more than ever, clarity about this particular issue is critical, imo.
When Jesus says "Love one another", he's talking about true love, and not about false love, don't you think?
Thoughts, Narg?
Hello Fractalizingiron:
Thank you for your comment, friend. It prompted more response from me than I can finish tonight; I'll address your parenthetical point about teachings first and try to edit my commentary on your main point down to a reasonable size for tomorrow or later in the week. You wrote:
THAT is an impressive insight, and a deep truth, known for thousands of years but largely forgotten. To slow down for a minute, here's Lao Tzu (or perhaps someone else; the authorship is disputed) on the subject circa 500BC:
Tao Te Ching (Gia-Fu Feng & Jane English Translation)
That makes a LOT more sense to me now than it did when I encountered it many years ago.
Less poetically, here's Iain McGilchrist on the subject in Ways of Attending: How our Divided Brain Constructs the World
Also:
Not understanding that causes HUGE problems in the world. Teachings are not the truth itself -- you said it, brother. Words are not the same as what they describe, and in fact words CANNOT accurately tell the full human truth of ANYTHING. This is one reason why Christians can and should feel united with those of any healthy religion; such religions are other ways of spreading Jesus' teachings, originally by people who never heard of Jesus. LOVE EXISTED BEFORE JESUS walked the Earth; Jesus brought love to the fore in His ministry but so does, for example, Jainism. Gandhi said it well:
It is the LOVE that is important; not the writings in the Bible or any other book. That is why to me "being saved" doesn't mean "believing" in Jesus but rather accepting and feeling, to whatever extent one can, the love / connection / empathy that each of us was born for, and why people who lived before Jesus and those today who have never heard the Gospel may nonetheless "believe in Him" -- because, as when Jesus talked about "little children who believe in me" he didn't mean an intellectual belief in Him but rather that they knew LOVE, as an experience, not as a concept.
Luke 17:21 -- a quotation from Jesus -- is proof of that to me:
Great Response, and a pleasure to read!
I look forward to your other response(s).
But, for a start, I think we are very much on the same wavelength on a number of things.
The quote from Lao tzu was a great start.
The Tao Te Ching was the first scriptural text I read aside from biblical content (which I hadn't really read, tho), starting from the age of 14. My subsequent journey in life took me to live in S. Korea, whose flag, you may be aware, sports 4 of the 8 trigrams and a symbol of the Great Eternity (the Tae Guk) (they call their flag the Tae Guk Ki, "ki" meaning flag), which probably underscores the level of influence Confucianism and Neo-Confucianism has historically held in that country and people.
"Not understanding that causes HUGE problems in the world." And everywhere IN the world, as well, from the individual level upwards to the global level! I'm not certain where I was first exposed to this concept, but it has become a virtual lodestone in the realms of my personal (internal) exploration: the Map is not the Territory
The quote from Ghandi is a good one too. It reminds me of something that was pivotal in me re-engaging with faith practice when I became an adult (18yrs), that thing being the parable of the blind men and the elephant. I'm guessing you are familiar with it.
There are nuances (which I would like to explore with you) around the significance and role of Jesus, what being 'saved' means etc. Nonetheless, I resonate strongly with your idea that "words CANNOT accurately tell the full human truth of ANYTHING, one reason why Christians can and should feel united with those of any healthy religion; such religions are other ways of spreading Jesus' teachings, originally by people who never heard of Jesus".
One caveat (or nuance, tweek) to that might be this: that only the words of a person who has come to embody the truth fully and completely can be regarded as direct expressions of truth. (Emphasizing the distinction between the record or teaching of Jesus' words vs those actual words, which were heard in real time in a different language 2000 years ago).
Either way, I resonate with your take on "love" here. I've never put it in those words. My own understanding / perspective is that many of the other faiths and teachings around the world had the purpose (from God's providential perspective) of preparing different peoples with different sociological, geographical and cultural conditions to be able to receive and connect with Jesus' teaching when it appeared.
How well that purpose was accomplished is a separate matter, but the point remains that all those healthy faiths / religions essentially have the same root, albeit it being expressed, imperfectly, in different ways.
In summary, I love your take on 'love' here (above), and I think there are some interesting ideas worth exploring further.
Great reply!
I agree, interesting topics. To me, "being saved" means getting as much of one's real and healthy self back as possible. It means being in touch with one's feelings and being free, to the extent one can be, from repression of feeling and the negative consequences of repression. It means knowing and feeling the importance of kindness to others, of connection with others, and where necessary working to put healthy behavior into practice despite any habits and defenses to the contrary.
I don't know if there's anything more to it than that; I never believed in the supernatural aspects of religion and don't feel any need for "life after death" or anything else; this life is what we have, and it IS a miracle. I'm open to the possibility of something else but don't yet see it; my lack / my loss, perhaps.
As to the significance of Jesus: He put the importance of love out there in plain language and in His own humble, courageous, and remarkable actions -- and captured the attention and devotion of millions for two thousand years now. In a world of violence, emotional pain, hardship, and ignorance, Jesus has kept the idea of LOVE and of a compassionate, healthy world alive in people's hearts even as they struggle to understand it. If a person has experienced very little love in their life and has enough repression to be out of touch with their deepest feelings, what can that person actually hear when someone speaks to them of love?
One cannot truly know what one has never experienced. THAT is why two thousand years of Christianity has had such patchy success at bringing love into the world. Not NO success, but far less than one could hope.
-- I'll forgo more detail right now since part 2 of my earlier comment, which I'm here to post, is already over-long and still only a portion of what I've written. Here goes:
Yes.
Think of a puppy, or a healthy young child. LOVE is the default; they don't need to be TAUGHT to feel love or to express it; love is the most natural thing in the world, like breathing. Love from a child (or a puppy) encourages a positive, loving response back from others -- assuming those others are emotionally healthy enough to respond in a healthy manner.
In the violent, blood-thirsty natural world of predators, parasites, and diseases, LOVE is the gift -- to other animals, but particularly to humans -- that protects life and perhaps more importantly, makes life worth living.
I'll talk about psychopaths (people with particular brain damage or lack of function) later. But aside from that small percentage of people, LOVE -- true love, as you put it -- is, once again, the default. ONLY trauma (beatings or other cruelty, emotional coldness, or other traumatic pain) can lead a healthy young child into what you are calling (if I read you correctly) false love. THAT is why Jesus made the point about not offending children so strongly. Trauma leads to repression and to physical and emotional defenses -- an infinite spectrum of them -- which cause harm to the traumatized person (alcohol, tobacco, and drug use, high blood pressure, suicide, etc) and to others -- physical or emotional cruelty, outright violence, lies, and so on.
The bad news is that nearly all of us have SOME repressed early trauma that blunts, to some degree, our openness to feeling and thus our ability to fully experience love. Most of us also have repressed anger as well as hurt (anger is a defense against pain, as well as a survival tool against threats in the environment), which works against our openness to love even more actively. And LOVE isn't the only thing damaged by early trauma.
The ACE Study (cohort of ~ 17,000 adults) shows what this actually means in the real world.
A short look at the Study: https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/MediaLibraries/URMCMedia/pediatrics/training/plc/documents/PLC_10-ACE-Study-Handout-MSL-5-2014.pdf
To partially convey the impact of early trauma, here's a longish excerpt from https://tatlife.com/the-adverse-childhood-experiences-study-the-largest-most-important-public-health-study-you-never-heard-of-began-in-an-obesity-clinic/ --
I'll say this: Jesus' teachings on how to treat children are rarely given anywhere near enough attention.
By far the most important thing we can do to encourage emotional health in people is to provide love early in life to each new generation -- from conception on. A healthy pregnancy, a safe and gentle birth, a loving childhood with plenty of social contact to help learn respect for others naturally, etc. FIXING emotional damage later is much harder and never completely effective.
More another day --