Lots to cover here. Will have to be done in multiple replies. Let's begin:
how does living in fear of death cause these diseases to manifest?
It's the sudden and lasting fear of death that triggers the psyche's response. This is a primordial, evolutionary, involuntary response. As the quickest way to die is through lack of oxygen, the psyche, having no awareness of time (because it truthfully does not exist), starts an immediate biological program to enable the individual to get more oxygen.
but not even a correlation between this state of mind and cancer/tuberculosis has ever been established.
If you're waiting for the cabal medical establishment to tell you the truth, you're going to be waiting a long time. The doctor that figured this out some 40 years ago had his life destroyed, medical license taken, kicked out of his own country, thrown in prison in another country and otherwise led a life of exile and persecution. What your response to me clearly demonstrates is that you still believe the establishment is telling the truth. When the reality of the matter is, they're telling you almost all lies. Apparently I'm under the mistaken impression that people on this board are keenly aware of this.
I myself have never had either of these diseases, either after bouts of existential crisis or more acute episodes where I thought I was about to die.
An existential crisis leads to either a kidney biological program that causes water retention or bone cancer - it depends on the subjective content of your crisis. Most of the time this is relatively harmless but if you were running a fear program in the lungs at the same time, you'd get pneumonia - what we call the "hospitalization conflict" - abandonment/existence conflict.
Anybody who has had a close call death experience probably had a teensy-weensy bit of lung cancer, assuming they got over it in an hour/day/week. The longer one holds onto their conflict, the more excess alveoli are produced and this then becomes detectable by scans. It's no accident that lung cancer is the #1 "secondary cancer" sold under the lie of "metastasis". When a person is told by the doctor they only have a year to live due to, say prostate cancer, they start a brand new conflict - fear of death. The next most common type of "secondary cancer" psuedo-metastasis is bone cancer, which is caused by a profound existential crisis ("what am I going to do with my life now?").
Furthermore, you speak of excess alveoli tissue that the bacterium responsible for TB allegedly gets rid of, yet you do not explain where this excess tissue comes from or how the TB bacterium gets rid of this excess tissue.
There's not enough room here to explain every last detail of every last thing I say. I'm sharing summaries and primers to stimulate new critical thinking. Your accusatory tone lacks tact and good-natured dialogue. If you have a question, ask it.
Just as your body generates new cells and tissues 24x7x365, it does the same with the lung alveoli. And it even does one better. In cases where the tissue is only to be temporary, it generates a slightly different type of tissue, what our insane medical establishment calls "cancer tissue". This is done so the TB mycobacteria can recognize what needs to be removed after conflict resolution. There's a condition called "latent tuberculosis" that researchers discovered approximately a hundred years ago. This is what all people with "lung cancer" have as the TB mycobacteria are also created by your body at the same time and pace as the excess alveoli. They remain dormant throughout the "fear of death" fright and only activate once somebody gets over their fear. Nothing complicated about any of this other than perhaps you don't realize your body creates bacteria. That you catch them from others is yet another deception passed off by the establishment - a lie that's never, ever been demonstrated in scientific experiments. The rodent vivisection lab torture proves absolutely nothing other than you shouldn't inject helpless creatures with toxic brews without causing problems - like 5th grade level science logic here.
Why would the human body make excess lung tissue if it's just going to cause potentially lethal TB later?
99% of the time, there's nothing "lethal" about this perfectly natural process. If you really want to understand what I'm saying you'll have to flip your understanding of dis-ease and health on its head because everything we've been taught is bass-ackwards. The excess lung tissue provides more oxygen to your organs and tissue. When you fear death, your breath becomes increasingly shallow. This is a primordial, involuntary instinct. Think predator/prey model. The people that died of TB in the past were generally poor and had little access to protein. Something the bacteria require to perform their work. As such, tuberculosis was coined "the poor man's dis-ease" for many decades. The entire Spanish flu event was riddled with soldiers that died of TB. Some of them feared death on a daily basis for 2+ years which created a lot of excess alveoli. Even then, it's survivable if their doctors would have the proper understanding of what was happening. But instead, they tried all kinds of crazy interventions to try and circumvent this natural process, which then led to greater problems. I realize it's an incredible leap of logic considering all our brainwashing, but the body knows EXACTLY what it's doing at all times. If we were simply to follow its promptings and urges, everything would be find. But nope, we've been brainwashed into denying the body and running to the white-robed priest, outsourcing our intellectual sovereignty and suffering the detrimental results. It's also worth noting that there is a "survival of the fittest" mechanism in play as well. For people who can't get over their conflicts and continue to re-hash them over and over again on a daily basis, unable to forgive and forget, unable to move on in life, nature deems them unfit for reproduction. So eventually, all of these natural biological programs will remove the individuals that are least likely to produce viable offspring. It's a harsh reality, but we have received guidance all our lives about not dwelling on our past insults and grievances. Some simply refuse to let go and suffer the consequences.
As the quickest way to die is through lack of oxygen, the psyche, having no awareness of time (because it truthfully does not exist), starts an immediate biological program to enable the individual to get more oxygen.
So... does the body trigger it's program to get more oxygen before or after it realizes it's lacking oxygen? Kind of hard to tell if time doesn't exist.
An existential crisis leads to either a kidney biological program that causes water retention or bone cancer - it depends on the subjective content of your crisis. Most of the time this is relatively harmless but if you were running a fear program in the lungs at the same time, you'd get pneumonia - what we call the "hospitalization conflict" - abandonment/existence conflict.
Well, I've never had any of those conditions either despite existential crises and brushes with death, so your theory isn't very good at making accurate predictions. It's also rather convenient that a brush with death only causes "mild" lung cancer that only lasts a day. I'd like to see the slightest shred of evidence that any form of lung cancer has only lasted a day and resolved on its own.
There's not enough room here to explain every last detail of every last thing I say.
Translation: I can't be bothered to defend my own theory, even when others ask for proof.
Your accusatory tone lacks tact and good-natured dialogue.
Asking a question about where excess alveoli tissue comes from is accusatory? All I did was point out that you did not explain this facet of your theory, you just stated it as if it were indisputable fact or common knowledge.
Since when is lung cancer tissue temporary? Even benign tumors stay in place and don't go away unless they are removed.
They remain dormant throughout the "fear of death" fright and only activate once somebody gets over their fear.
So if I fear death I get bone cancer, but if I get over my fear of death I get pneumonia or TB. So I'm screwed either way. Wonderful. /s
perhaps you don't realize your body creates bacteria.
If the human body created bacteria, then that bacteria would have the exact same DNA as the rest of the body. They do not; bacteria are vastly genetically different than humans; they don't even have the same number of chromosomes. Which organs or tissues of the body are responsible for bacteria production, and how do they manufacture something that it doesn't share DNA with?
That you catch them from others is yet another deception passed off by the establishment - a lie that's never, ever been demonstrated in scientific experiments.
You don't catch bacteria/viruses from others? Then how on earth do these diseases spread? Viral and bacterial infections spread regardless of the state of mind of any of the humans involved. Most of the time there's even an incubation period lasting several days before an infected person manifests symptoms, where the person has no idea they're infected, and would therefore not be worried about their health or mortality. "You fear death, therefore you get sick" doesn't explain this spread at all.
99% of the time, there's nothing "lethal" about this perfectly natural process. [Tuberculosis]
In 2010 there were 8.8 million cases of TB worldwide, with an estimated 1.20-1.45 million deaths resulting from those cases. That's a 13.6-16.5% mortality rate. In the US that mortality rate is going to be lower because we have better healthcare and hygiene. Which leads to the following question: why do developing countries have a harder time dealing with contagious diseases and have higher mortality rates? Do they have more psychological stress or a greater fear of death than those living in developed countries, and if so why?
If the human body created bacteria, then that bacteria would have the exact same DNA as the rest of the body. They do not; bacteria are vastly genetically different than humans; they don't even have the same number of chromosomes. Which organs or tissues of the body are responsible for bacteria production, and how do they manufacture something that it doesn't share DNA with?
Is this the hill you want to die on? Gotta pick one to go with.
You don't catch bacteria/viruses from others? Then how on earth do these diseases spread? Viral and bacterial infections spread regardless of the state of mind of any of the humans involved. Most of the time there's even an incubation period lasting several days before an infected person manifests symptoms, where the person has no idea they're infected, and would therefore not be worried about their health or mortality. "You fear death, therefore you get sick" doesn't explain this spread at all.
Or perhaps this hill?
99% of the time, there's nothing "lethal" about this perfectly natural process. [Tuberculosis]
You excluded the most important part of the point I made in this paragraph. Namely --> IF LEFT ALONE and secondly, PRESUMING THE PATIENT HAS AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF PROTEIN IN THEIR DIET.
Should the patient seek "medical attention", which we've all been brainwashed into doing, this is where the death and devastation arise from. But apparently that point was lost on you, as it had to be, in order for you to build up your superioirity complex in your mind.
Well done strawman builder guy, well done.....you're even so good at this that you built a strawman out me allegedly builing a strawman in my very first comment. Absolutely hilarious!!
Now, we proceed on only one topic of your choice. You pick. What's it going to be?
Is this the hill you want to die on? Gotta pick one to go with.
Or perhaps this hill?
Well, you don't provide any evidence or counterarguments, so I have no reason not to believe that germ theory is accurate and that the human body does not manufacture it's own bacteria. You keep telling me to be open minded, but refuse to provide evidence despite my multiple requests for it.
You excluded the most important part of the point I made in this paragraph. Namely --> IF LEFT ALONE and secondly, PRESUMING THE PATIENT HAS AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF PROTEIN IN THEIR DIET.
Should the patient seek "medical attention", which we've all been brainwashed into doing, this is where the death and devastation arise from. But apparently that point was lost on you, as it had to be, in order for you to build up your superioirity complex in your mind.
OK, let's put this to the test. Developing countries tend to have a harder time dealing with contagious diseases and have a higher mortality rate from these diseases compared to a developed country like the US. People in the US have the scary establishment medical care, and better hygiene that according to your theory isn't necessary, but they also have access to more protein and more food in general. Developing countries don't have as extensive medical infrastructure that allegedly mistreats them, but they also have poorer diets and worse hygiene. Should not these contrasting effects cancel themselves out? Why then do developing countries have more infections and more deaths due to these infections than the US? If our medical establishment is slowly killing us, why are we generally in better shape than many other countries that don't have as entrenched a medical establishment?
Now, we proceed on only one topic of your choice. You pick. What's it going to be?
Give the exact mechanism by which excess anger causes hepatitis, and which strain of hepatitis specifically. Or alternatively prove that the human body makes its own bacteria despite not sharing any DNA with said bacteria, and despite the fact that many different species of bacteria have DNA that are vastly different from each other.
So... does the body trigger it's program to get more oxygen before or after it realizes it's lacking oxygen? Kind of hard to tell if time doesn't exist.
Neither. It's instantaneous the microsecond you're afraid you're going to die. It doesn't "detect a lack of oxygen", it instantiates shallower breathing so as to protect the individual from what it perceives as the IMMINENT possibility of death - which is, evolutionarily speaking, that a predator is nearby.
Well, I've never had any of those conditions either despite existential crises and brushes with death, so your theory isn't very good at making accurate predictions.
An "existential crisis" leads to a biological kidney program that causes water retention. This programs happens millions of times a day, to millions of different people. The overwhelming majority resolve this conflict in relatively short order - a day, week, maybe a month. And for those who resolve their existential crisis conflict, nothing much out of sorts occurs. They have the excess "pee-pees" for a day or two as the body now expels the excess water. The feel less "bloated" in a few days. In short, there is no noticeable "dis-ease" with resolution of the kidney program most of the time. The problems start, with all conflict shocks, when they are held onto for months and years at a time. A wide variety of named "dis-eases" can result. I couldn't possibly rattle them all off in this dialogue.
If you truly want to understand what I'm sharing and stop attacking me every chance you get, you tell me about a dis-ease you've had in the past and I'll tell you your conflict shock (which you snidely referred to as "mind games" in the other post) that preceded your dis-ease. If you were to be honest with me, you'd see that the CAUSATION DIAGNOSIS I provide you is quite accurate, as opposed to the establishment buffet of psuedo-causation, e.g. diet, genetics, germs, family history, lifestyle, environmental carcinogen, etc. So how about it?
For those who get pneumonia, they are running TWO biological programs simultaneously, each caused by a different "mind game", as I explained. The double-whammy of pneumonia always starts with the scare-fright-worry-concern conflict. ALWAYS. These conflicts register in the laryngeal and bronchial tubes. The purpose is to widen the tubes to allow more oxygen into the lungs. This conflict is not as SEVERE as the 'death-fright conflict" which registers in the lungs as I've already explained in detail. Hopefully you can clearly see these are different types of "mind games". Now, during the entirety of the scare-fright-worry-concern mind game, the tubes are consistently widened. The longer the mind game lasts, the more tissue alteration that occurs. The greater the intensity of the mind game, the greater amount of tissue is necrotized. When the mind-game is resolved, the psyche reverses this tissue alteration and begins proliferating new tissue to return the individual to homeostasis. And this is the period of time when we "get sick" and run to the doctor to curtail the "dis-ease", to suppress the symptoms, to "get rid of it as fast as we can". The "it" being a perfectly natural biological process mind you. And there are multiple named "dis-eases" during this specific process, adults most often get labeled as having bronchitis and children get labeled as having whooping cough/pertussis. But it's the same natural biological program. Left alone, everything will return to normal in time. And that "time" is usually in direct relation to the "time" duration of the ongoing "mind-game". So if I'm deeply scared-worried-concerned over something for a week, I have about a week of bronchitis symptoms. This is not quite the case for long-running mind games that extend beyond 3-6 months but it's a good general rule to follow for the vast majority of "mind-games" people entertain.
The second program being run for those who get pneumonia is the abandonment/existence mind-game. This running concurrent to someone who is in the resolution phase of the scare-fright-worry-concern mind-game. As all healing/restoration occurs in fluid, inflammation and higher temperatures, the excess fluid in the inflamed bronchial tubes is now exacerbated. If the duration and intensity of the individual's scare-fright mind-game were long and strong, the restoration/healing is going to be more intense and long. And this is what is known as pneumonia, as the excess fluid retention leaks into the lungs of the patient and potentially drowns.
This is the "hospitalization conflict" - ABANDONMENT. And this water retention syndrome can kill the patient in a whole variety of different ways for an individual in a mind-game resolution phase at the hospital. Pneumonia is but one.
Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, in his book "Confessions of a Medical Heretic", figured this out in the 1970s. He did not understand what was happening or why, but he quite astutely observed that patients who were left alone with few if any visitors had a massively higher mortality rate than those who had regular visitors. It's one of his strongest admonitions he lays out in the book - to never leave a loved one alone in the hospital for even a second. The establishment medical cabal knows this all too well also. Just think about the recent "Covid protocols" and you might begin to realize the establishment deception you're presently aware of is only the tip of the tip of the tip of the iceberg. And you'd be wise to read this book while you're at it. Mendlsohn highlights dozens of problems with establishment medicine. A worthy read should you dare to challenge your beliefs.
The deeper existential mind-game reaches into the bones. And this is why "bone cancer" is the second most common "secondary cancer" said to be caused by the evidence-less "metastasis" THEORY, of course passed off as "truth" by the establishment. I suspect "proof" that you willingly fall for unfortunately. But ask yourself this simple question; if cancer cells travel through the bloodstream, why doesn't the Red Cross or any other blood bank screen donated blood for cancer cells? Things that make "most of us" go hmmmmmm?
It's also rather convenient that a brush with death only causes "mild" lung cancer that only lasts a day.
A "brush with death", as you say, would cause perhaps a millisecond of "lung cancer" or maybe 10 seconds, or 10 minutes. Part of the problem you're having with all this is that you've been brainwashed into BELIEVING lung cancer is a deadly, mutating, out-of-control process of your body that is broken, failing and malfunctioning. This is the PICTURE that has been painted by the ruling establishment cabal of "what cancer is". You're clearly not even remotely ready to entertain just how much damage this "painted picture" does all by itself. In addition to your establishment beliefs, you're a MATERIALIST to the core. Just as we've all been trained to be. You simply haven't made any attempt to break this programming yet.
I said quite clearly that such a "brush with death" wouldn't even be a detectable thing. It takes many weeks and more likely months for the body to form a "lung nodule" as are seen with people who have entertained their death-fright mind-game. And for those who entertained their mind-game for many months but eventually got over it, possibly had a bit of bloody sputum or mucous for a few weeks and WISELY ignored it, never to have even known they had the great killer scourge sold to us as LUNG CANCER. All these people with short-duration death-fright mind-games went through that process that nobody in the establishment wants to talk about any longer named "spontaneous remission". It happens millions times of year around the world. A perfectly natural process.
But wait, don't tell me, you need EVIDENCE, right? Evidence the establishment cartel would most definitely want to to provide you, right? Because they're not up to anything nefarious at all. They make hundreds of billions of dollars a year with their burn-cut-poison model of "treatment". But they'd be happy to give that all up for the betterment of humanity in light of the "EVIDENCE", right? This is where you're trapped. You presently BELIEVE the establishment medical cartel is interested in our health and well-being. I hate to break it to you, but the EXACT OPPOSITE is the truth. And the "evidence" is all around you. You can start with that book I recommended. That happens to be a book I recommend to a lot of people who haven't yet come-to-terms with the situation we're in. As Q once said "be wary of those you trust the most". He was referring to EVERY SINGLE ONE of our established, dominant, power and control wielding establishments - BAR NONE.
So please stop with this "where's the evidence" demand in every other sentence. As I said in my prior comment, pick one subject and I'll provide you all you could ever hope for. But you're going to have to learn to seek out "alternative explanations" to the standing establishment PSEUDO-EVIDENCE you completely rely on today.
Translation: I can't be bothered to defend my own theory, even when others ask for proof.
Wrong again. I reiterate, pick one topic and we'll dive to the depths, should you dare to agree to.
you just stated it as if it were indisputable fact or common knowledge.
I said nothing of the sort....lol. You love to put words in my mouth. Hey everybody, I love to make comments on this board that are indisputable facts and common knowledge because I love to just hear myself talk...yayyyy for me!!!!
You're going to have to put on your own thinking cap here if we're going to make any progress. Do you know what "lung cancer" even is? Is it not excess lung aveoli on its face? What else is could it be? Think man, stop BEGGING to be spoon fed on each and every point. THINK!!!. Could what I'm saying be possible? Quit outsourcing your intellectual sovereignty to the "experts" and THINK FOR YOURSELF before you beg to have your mind filled up with another idea that's not your own. And then ask, "which part of this explanation is possible or impossible"? Is my explanation impossible? Really? Can you kill the CANCER-BOOGEYMAN in your mind for just a minute and think outside the box?
What if cancer isn't the evil boogeyman it has been portrayed to be by the establishment cartel? Is this even possible?
Do you even know how must people diagnosed with cancer die? I don't think you do. You've got a lot to learn before you shill for the establishment like you are. You're the dangerous one and know not of what you speak. You simply spout the establishment narrative as if it were unassailable truth. Scary! Especially here on a board where lies and deceptions are exposed on a daily basis.
So if I fear death I get bone cancer, but if I get over my fear of death I get pneumonia or TB. So I'm screwed either way. Wonderful. /s
I see you can't resist acting like a doucebag every few sentences. You clearly don't want to understand anything I'm saying. You much prefer inventing your own interpretations so you can build your own strawman arguments to make yourself feel good. You're in a sorry state.
I never even REMOTELY stated the above sentence you've constructed out of your very lost and confused mind. But congratulations on muddling it all up so as to be able to easily fall back on your establishment model of decay, deception and death. Well done!
Neither. It's instantaneous the microsecond you're afraid you're going to die. It doesn't "detect a lack of oxygen", it instantiates shallower breathing so as to protect the individual from what it perceives as the IMMINENT possibility of death - which is, evolutionarily speaking, that a predator is nearby.
This is called the fight or flight response, and this has almost nothing to do with illness beyond the fact that excess stress can weaken the immune system, making infection more likely. I also find it amusing that you reject mainstream thought on medicine but accept mainstream thought on evolution, despite the overwhelming evidence that evolution is a flawed theory.
An "existential crisis" leads to a biological kidney program that causes water retention.
Repeating your claims doesn't make them true. Do you have ANY evidence that existential dread/crises cause water retention?
In short, there is no noticeable "dis-ease" with resolution of the kidney program most of the time.
Ooohhh, so you're theory is true, its just undetectable. How convenient!
you tell me about a dis-ease you've had in the past and I'll tell you your conflict shock
Today's your lucky day, I came down with a cold today. My symptoms consist of mild congestion and a sore throat. Psychoanalyze away!
If you were to be honest with me, you'd see that the CAUSATION DIAGNOSIS I provide you is quite accurate, as opposed to the establishment buffet of psuedo-causation, e.g. diet, genetics, germs, family history, lifestyle, environmental carcinogen, etc.
Oh, so I'm only honest if I unquestioningly agree with your diagnosis? How is that not a blind appeal to authority that you accuse me of?
So genetics, diet, family history, lifestyle, and carcinogens have no effect on human health whatsoever? How about we put your theory to the test by having you eat junk food everyday and sleep with some uranium under your pillow. Shouldn't have any effect, right? Cancer is caused by psychology, not radiation! /s
A "brush with death", as you say, would cause perhaps a millisecond of "lung cancer" or maybe 10 seconds, or 10 minutes.
So once again your theory is right, just unverifiable because it vanishes too quickly without a trace. Also, what would cause this lung cancer to last for 10 minutes instead of a millisecond?
Part of the problem you're having with all this is that you've been brainwashed into BELIEVING lung cancer is a deadly
Lung cancer IS deadly, it steals nutrients from healthy lung tissue and physically crowds it out, causing the lungs to not function properly. I dare you to say that lung cancer isn't deadly to anyone who has it or anyone who's lost a loved one to it.
But wait, don't tell me, you need EVIDENCE, right? Evidence the establishment cartel would most definitely want to to provide you, right?
I don't need the establishment to provide evidence for your theory, I want YOU to provide evidence for your own theory. And since there is much evidence that contradicts your theory (like the fact that infection/mortality rates after surgery dropped after better hygiene was adopted), your theory needs to properly address contradictory evidence as well.
Wrong again. I reiterate, pick one topic and we'll dive to the depths, should you dare to agree to.
You haven't answered a single one of my questions so far, like why fear of starvation causes liver cancer and not other problems elsewhere in the digestive tract. Your refusal to answer my questions forthrightly indicates that you don't have an answer that would stand up to scrutiny.
Do you know what "lung cancer" even is? Is it not excess lung aveoli on its face? What else is could it be?
Lung cancer is not excess alveoli. Alveoli are air sacs formed by lung cells, alveoli are not cells in and of themselves. Lung cancer, like any other cancer, is a subset of those cells that do not replicate properly; either by not stopping growth when they're supposed to or growing much faster than they're supposed to. This excess growth create tumors, which are not alveoli and do not function like alveoli.
Is my explanation impossible? Really? Can you kill the CANCER-BOOGEYMAN in your mind for just a minute and think outside the box?
I never said your explanation is impossible, I said you haven't used rational arguments or evidence to back your assertions. Why is this such a hard concept for you? Also, why do you assume that I can't think for myself just because I disagree with you?
If I'm afraid I'm going to die for a year, I'm going to get easily detectable lung cancer for a year should I be foolish enough to get an "annual checkup". I'm actually perfectly healthy during this time, receiving more oxygen than normal to all my organs, which is the purpose of the excess lung alveoli tissue. Now, should I resolve my conflict and no longer fear death, I'm going to have a year of coughing up blood and blood in my sputum - aka "tuberculosis".
You yourself said that if someone fears death, they get what the establishment calls lung cancer (which is not excess alveoli btw). Then you said that if someone gets over their fear of death, this resolution manifests as tuberculosis. So while I should have said lung cancer instead of bone cancer, my assessment that I'm screwed either way is accurate. Pointing out the absurdities of your theory is not a strawman.
Lots to cover here. Will have to be done in multiple replies. Let's begin:
It's the sudden and lasting fear of death that triggers the psyche's response. This is a primordial, evolutionary, involuntary response. As the quickest way to die is through lack of oxygen, the psyche, having no awareness of time (because it truthfully does not exist), starts an immediate biological program to enable the individual to get more oxygen.
If you're waiting for the cabal medical establishment to tell you the truth, you're going to be waiting a long time. The doctor that figured this out some 40 years ago had his life destroyed, medical license taken, kicked out of his own country, thrown in prison in another country and otherwise led a life of exile and persecution. What your response to me clearly demonstrates is that you still believe the establishment is telling the truth. When the reality of the matter is, they're telling you almost all lies. Apparently I'm under the mistaken impression that people on this board are keenly aware of this.
An existential crisis leads to either a kidney biological program that causes water retention or bone cancer - it depends on the subjective content of your crisis. Most of the time this is relatively harmless but if you were running a fear program in the lungs at the same time, you'd get pneumonia - what we call the "hospitalization conflict" - abandonment/existence conflict.
Anybody who has had a close call death experience probably had a teensy-weensy bit of lung cancer, assuming they got over it in an hour/day/week. The longer one holds onto their conflict, the more excess alveoli are produced and this then becomes detectable by scans. It's no accident that lung cancer is the #1 "secondary cancer" sold under the lie of "metastasis". When a person is told by the doctor they only have a year to live due to, say prostate cancer, they start a brand new conflict - fear of death. The next most common type of "secondary cancer" psuedo-metastasis is bone cancer, which is caused by a profound existential crisis ("what am I going to do with my life now?").
There's not enough room here to explain every last detail of every last thing I say. I'm sharing summaries and primers to stimulate new critical thinking. Your accusatory tone lacks tact and good-natured dialogue. If you have a question, ask it.
Just as your body generates new cells and tissues 24x7x365, it does the same with the lung alveoli. And it even does one better. In cases where the tissue is only to be temporary, it generates a slightly different type of tissue, what our insane medical establishment calls "cancer tissue". This is done so the TB mycobacteria can recognize what needs to be removed after conflict resolution. There's a condition called "latent tuberculosis" that researchers discovered approximately a hundred years ago. This is what all people with "lung cancer" have as the TB mycobacteria are also created by your body at the same time and pace as the excess alveoli. They remain dormant throughout the "fear of death" fright and only activate once somebody gets over their fear. Nothing complicated about any of this other than perhaps you don't realize your body creates bacteria. That you catch them from others is yet another deception passed off by the establishment - a lie that's never, ever been demonstrated in scientific experiments. The rodent vivisection lab torture proves absolutely nothing other than you shouldn't inject helpless creatures with toxic brews without causing problems - like 5th grade level science logic here.
99% of the time, there's nothing "lethal" about this perfectly natural process. If you really want to understand what I'm saying you'll have to flip your understanding of dis-ease and health on its head because everything we've been taught is bass-ackwards. The excess lung tissue provides more oxygen to your organs and tissue. When you fear death, your breath becomes increasingly shallow. This is a primordial, involuntary instinct. Think predator/prey model. The people that died of TB in the past were generally poor and had little access to protein. Something the bacteria require to perform their work. As such, tuberculosis was coined "the poor man's dis-ease" for many decades. The entire Spanish flu event was riddled with soldiers that died of TB. Some of them feared death on a daily basis for 2+ years which created a lot of excess alveoli. Even then, it's survivable if their doctors would have the proper understanding of what was happening. But instead, they tried all kinds of crazy interventions to try and circumvent this natural process, which then led to greater problems. I realize it's an incredible leap of logic considering all our brainwashing, but the body knows EXACTLY what it's doing at all times. If we were simply to follow its promptings and urges, everything would be find. But nope, we've been brainwashed into denying the body and running to the white-robed priest, outsourcing our intellectual sovereignty and suffering the detrimental results. It's also worth noting that there is a "survival of the fittest" mechanism in play as well. For people who can't get over their conflicts and continue to re-hash them over and over again on a daily basis, unable to forgive and forget, unable to move on in life, nature deems them unfit for reproduction. So eventually, all of these natural biological programs will remove the individuals that are least likely to produce viable offspring. It's a harsh reality, but we have received guidance all our lives about not dwelling on our past insults and grievances. Some simply refuse to let go and suffer the consequences.
That's all for now...more later..
So... does the body trigger it's program to get more oxygen before or after it realizes it's lacking oxygen? Kind of hard to tell if time doesn't exist.
Well, I've never had any of those conditions either despite existential crises and brushes with death, so your theory isn't very good at making accurate predictions. It's also rather convenient that a brush with death only causes "mild" lung cancer that only lasts a day. I'd like to see the slightest shred of evidence that any form of lung cancer has only lasted a day and resolved on its own.
Translation: I can't be bothered to defend my own theory, even when others ask for proof.
Asking a question about where excess alveoli tissue comes from is accusatory? All I did was point out that you did not explain this facet of your theory, you just stated it as if it were indisputable fact or common knowledge.
Since when is lung cancer tissue temporary? Even benign tumors stay in place and don't go away unless they are removed.
So if I fear death I get bone cancer, but if I get over my fear of death I get pneumonia or TB. So I'm screwed either way. Wonderful. /s
If the human body created bacteria, then that bacteria would have the exact same DNA as the rest of the body. They do not; bacteria are vastly genetically different than humans; they don't even have the same number of chromosomes. Which organs or tissues of the body are responsible for bacteria production, and how do they manufacture something that it doesn't share DNA with?
You don't catch bacteria/viruses from others? Then how on earth do these diseases spread? Viral and bacterial infections spread regardless of the state of mind of any of the humans involved. Most of the time there's even an incubation period lasting several days before an infected person manifests symptoms, where the person has no idea they're infected, and would therefore not be worried about their health or mortality. "You fear death, therefore you get sick" doesn't explain this spread at all.
In 2010 there were 8.8 million cases of TB worldwide, with an estimated 1.20-1.45 million deaths resulting from those cases. That's a 13.6-16.5% mortality rate. In the US that mortality rate is going to be lower because we have better healthcare and hygiene. Which leads to the following question: why do developing countries have a harder time dealing with contagious diseases and have higher mortality rates? Do they have more psychological stress or a greater fear of death than those living in developed countries, and if so why?
Is this the hill you want to die on? Gotta pick one to go with.
Or perhaps this hill?
You excluded the most important part of the point I made in this paragraph. Namely --> IF LEFT ALONE and secondly, PRESUMING THE PATIENT HAS AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF PROTEIN IN THEIR DIET.
Should the patient seek "medical attention", which we've all been brainwashed into doing, this is where the death and devastation arise from. But apparently that point was lost on you, as it had to be, in order for you to build up your superioirity complex in your mind.
Well done strawman builder guy, well done.....you're even so good at this that you built a strawman out me allegedly builing a strawman in my very first comment. Absolutely hilarious!!
Now, we proceed on only one topic of your choice. You pick. What's it going to be?
Well, you don't provide any evidence or counterarguments, so I have no reason not to believe that germ theory is accurate and that the human body does not manufacture it's own bacteria. You keep telling me to be open minded, but refuse to provide evidence despite my multiple requests for it.
OK, let's put this to the test. Developing countries tend to have a harder time dealing with contagious diseases and have a higher mortality rate from these diseases compared to a developed country like the US. People in the US have the scary establishment medical care, and better hygiene that according to your theory isn't necessary, but they also have access to more protein and more food in general. Developing countries don't have as extensive medical infrastructure that allegedly mistreats them, but they also have poorer diets and worse hygiene. Should not these contrasting effects cancel themselves out? Why then do developing countries have more infections and more deaths due to these infections than the US? If our medical establishment is slowly killing us, why are we generally in better shape than many other countries that don't have as entrenched a medical establishment?
Give the exact mechanism by which excess anger causes hepatitis, and which strain of hepatitis specifically. Or alternatively prove that the human body makes its own bacteria despite not sharing any DNA with said bacteria, and despite the fact that many different species of bacteria have DNA that are vastly different from each other.
Neither. It's instantaneous the microsecond you're afraid you're going to die. It doesn't "detect a lack of oxygen", it instantiates shallower breathing so as to protect the individual from what it perceives as the IMMINENT possibility of death - which is, evolutionarily speaking, that a predator is nearby.
An "existential crisis" leads to a biological kidney program that causes water retention. This programs happens millions of times a day, to millions of different people. The overwhelming majority resolve this conflict in relatively short order - a day, week, maybe a month. And for those who resolve their existential crisis conflict, nothing much out of sorts occurs. They have the excess "pee-pees" for a day or two as the body now expels the excess water. The feel less "bloated" in a few days. In short, there is no noticeable "dis-ease" with resolution of the kidney program most of the time. The problems start, with all conflict shocks, when they are held onto for months and years at a time. A wide variety of named "dis-eases" can result. I couldn't possibly rattle them all off in this dialogue.
If you truly want to understand what I'm sharing and stop attacking me every chance you get, you tell me about a dis-ease you've had in the past and I'll tell you your conflict shock (which you snidely referred to as "mind games" in the other post) that preceded your dis-ease. If you were to be honest with me, you'd see that the CAUSATION DIAGNOSIS I provide you is quite accurate, as opposed to the establishment buffet of psuedo-causation, e.g. diet, genetics, germs, family history, lifestyle, environmental carcinogen, etc. So how about it?
For those who get pneumonia, they are running TWO biological programs simultaneously, each caused by a different "mind game", as I explained. The double-whammy of pneumonia always starts with the scare-fright-worry-concern conflict. ALWAYS. These conflicts register in the laryngeal and bronchial tubes. The purpose is to widen the tubes to allow more oxygen into the lungs. This conflict is not as SEVERE as the 'death-fright conflict" which registers in the lungs as I've already explained in detail. Hopefully you can clearly see these are different types of "mind games". Now, during the entirety of the scare-fright-worry-concern mind game, the tubes are consistently widened. The longer the mind game lasts, the more tissue alteration that occurs. The greater the intensity of the mind game, the greater amount of tissue is necrotized. When the mind-game is resolved, the psyche reverses this tissue alteration and begins proliferating new tissue to return the individual to homeostasis. And this is the period of time when we "get sick" and run to the doctor to curtail the "dis-ease", to suppress the symptoms, to "get rid of it as fast as we can". The "it" being a perfectly natural biological process mind you. And there are multiple named "dis-eases" during this specific process, adults most often get labeled as having bronchitis and children get labeled as having whooping cough/pertussis. But it's the same natural biological program. Left alone, everything will return to normal in time. And that "time" is usually in direct relation to the "time" duration of the ongoing "mind-game". So if I'm deeply scared-worried-concerned over something for a week, I have about a week of bronchitis symptoms. This is not quite the case for long-running mind games that extend beyond 3-6 months but it's a good general rule to follow for the vast majority of "mind-games" people entertain.
The second program being run for those who get pneumonia is the abandonment/existence mind-game. This running concurrent to someone who is in the resolution phase of the scare-fright-worry-concern mind-game. As all healing/restoration occurs in fluid, inflammation and higher temperatures, the excess fluid in the inflamed bronchial tubes is now exacerbated. If the duration and intensity of the individual's scare-fright mind-game were long and strong, the restoration/healing is going to be more intense and long. And this is what is known as pneumonia, as the excess fluid retention leaks into the lungs of the patient and potentially drowns.
This is the "hospitalization conflict" - ABANDONMENT. And this water retention syndrome can kill the patient in a whole variety of different ways for an individual in a mind-game resolution phase at the hospital. Pneumonia is but one.
Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, in his book "Confessions of a Medical Heretic", figured this out in the 1970s. He did not understand what was happening or why, but he quite astutely observed that patients who were left alone with few if any visitors had a massively higher mortality rate than those who had regular visitors. It's one of his strongest admonitions he lays out in the book - to never leave a loved one alone in the hospital for even a second. The establishment medical cabal knows this all too well also. Just think about the recent "Covid protocols" and you might begin to realize the establishment deception you're presently aware of is only the tip of the tip of the tip of the iceberg. And you'd be wise to read this book while you're at it. Mendlsohn highlights dozens of problems with establishment medicine. A worthy read should you dare to challenge your beliefs.
The deeper existential mind-game reaches into the bones. And this is why "bone cancer" is the second most common "secondary cancer" said to be caused by the evidence-less "metastasis" THEORY, of course passed off as "truth" by the establishment. I suspect "proof" that you willingly fall for unfortunately. But ask yourself this simple question; if cancer cells travel through the bloodstream, why doesn't the Red Cross or any other blood bank screen donated blood for cancer cells? Things that make "most of us" go hmmmmmm?
A "brush with death", as you say, would cause perhaps a millisecond of "lung cancer" or maybe 10 seconds, or 10 minutes. Part of the problem you're having with all this is that you've been brainwashed into BELIEVING lung cancer is a deadly, mutating, out-of-control process of your body that is broken, failing and malfunctioning. This is the PICTURE that has been painted by the ruling establishment cabal of "what cancer is". You're clearly not even remotely ready to entertain just how much damage this "painted picture" does all by itself. In addition to your establishment beliefs, you're a MATERIALIST to the core. Just as we've all been trained to be. You simply haven't made any attempt to break this programming yet.
I said quite clearly that such a "brush with death" wouldn't even be a detectable thing. It takes many weeks and more likely months for the body to form a "lung nodule" as are seen with people who have entertained their death-fright mind-game. And for those who entertained their mind-game for many months but eventually got over it, possibly had a bit of bloody sputum or mucous for a few weeks and WISELY ignored it, never to have even known they had the great killer scourge sold to us as LUNG CANCER. All these people with short-duration death-fright mind-games went through that process that nobody in the establishment wants to talk about any longer named "spontaneous remission". It happens millions times of year around the world. A perfectly natural process.
But wait, don't tell me, you need EVIDENCE, right? Evidence the establishment cartel would most definitely want to to provide you, right? Because they're not up to anything nefarious at all. They make hundreds of billions of dollars a year with their burn-cut-poison model of "treatment". But they'd be happy to give that all up for the betterment of humanity in light of the "EVIDENCE", right? This is where you're trapped. You presently BELIEVE the establishment medical cartel is interested in our health and well-being. I hate to break it to you, but the EXACT OPPOSITE is the truth. And the "evidence" is all around you. You can start with that book I recommended. That happens to be a book I recommend to a lot of people who haven't yet come-to-terms with the situation we're in. As Q once said "be wary of those you trust the most". He was referring to EVERY SINGLE ONE of our established, dominant, power and control wielding establishments - BAR NONE.
So please stop with this "where's the evidence" demand in every other sentence. As I said in my prior comment, pick one subject and I'll provide you all you could ever hope for. But you're going to have to learn to seek out "alternative explanations" to the standing establishment PSEUDO-EVIDENCE you completely rely on today.
Wrong again. I reiterate, pick one topic and we'll dive to the depths, should you dare to agree to.
I said nothing of the sort....lol. You love to put words in my mouth. Hey everybody, I love to make comments on this board that are indisputable facts and common knowledge because I love to just hear myself talk...yayyyy for me!!!!
You're going to have to put on your own thinking cap here if we're going to make any progress. Do you know what "lung cancer" even is? Is it not excess lung aveoli on its face? What else is could it be? Think man, stop BEGGING to be spoon fed on each and every point. THINK!!!. Could what I'm saying be possible? Quit outsourcing your intellectual sovereignty to the "experts" and THINK FOR YOURSELF before you beg to have your mind filled up with another idea that's not your own. And then ask, "which part of this explanation is possible or impossible"? Is my explanation impossible? Really? Can you kill the CANCER-BOOGEYMAN in your mind for just a minute and think outside the box?
What if cancer isn't the evil boogeyman it has been portrayed to be by the establishment cartel? Is this even possible?
Do you even know how must people diagnosed with cancer die? I don't think you do. You've got a lot to learn before you shill for the establishment like you are. You're the dangerous one and know not of what you speak. You simply spout the establishment narrative as if it were unassailable truth. Scary! Especially here on a board where lies and deceptions are exposed on a daily basis.
I see you can't resist acting like a doucebag every few sentences. You clearly don't want to understand anything I'm saying. You much prefer inventing your own interpretations so you can build your own strawman arguments to make yourself feel good. You're in a sorry state.
I never even REMOTELY stated the above sentence you've constructed out of your very lost and confused mind. But congratulations on muddling it all up so as to be able to easily fall back on your establishment model of decay, deception and death. Well done!
Out of space,,,more to come.
This is called the fight or flight response, and this has almost nothing to do with illness beyond the fact that excess stress can weaken the immune system, making infection more likely. I also find it amusing that you reject mainstream thought on medicine but accept mainstream thought on evolution, despite the overwhelming evidence that evolution is a flawed theory.
Repeating your claims doesn't make them true. Do you have ANY evidence that existential dread/crises cause water retention?
Ooohhh, so you're theory is true, its just undetectable. How convenient!
Today's your lucky day, I came down with a cold today. My symptoms consist of mild congestion and a sore throat. Psychoanalyze away!
Oh, so I'm only honest if I unquestioningly agree with your diagnosis? How is that not a blind appeal to authority that you accuse me of?
So genetics, diet, family history, lifestyle, and carcinogens have no effect on human health whatsoever? How about we put your theory to the test by having you eat junk food everyday and sleep with some uranium under your pillow. Shouldn't have any effect, right? Cancer is caused by psychology, not radiation! /s
So once again your theory is right, just unverifiable because it vanishes too quickly without a trace. Also, what would cause this lung cancer to last for 10 minutes instead of a millisecond?
Lung cancer IS deadly, it steals nutrients from healthy lung tissue and physically crowds it out, causing the lungs to not function properly. I dare you to say that lung cancer isn't deadly to anyone who has it or anyone who's lost a loved one to it.
I don't need the establishment to provide evidence for your theory, I want YOU to provide evidence for your own theory. And since there is much evidence that contradicts your theory (like the fact that infection/mortality rates after surgery dropped after better hygiene was adopted), your theory needs to properly address contradictory evidence as well.
You haven't answered a single one of my questions so far, like why fear of starvation causes liver cancer and not other problems elsewhere in the digestive tract. Your refusal to answer my questions forthrightly indicates that you don't have an answer that would stand up to scrutiny.
Lung cancer is not excess alveoli. Alveoli are air sacs formed by lung cells, alveoli are not cells in and of themselves. Lung cancer, like any other cancer, is a subset of those cells that do not replicate properly; either by not stopping growth when they're supposed to or growing much faster than they're supposed to. This excess growth create tumors, which are not alveoli and do not function like alveoli.
I never said your explanation is impossible, I said you haven't used rational arguments or evidence to back your assertions. Why is this such a hard concept for you? Also, why do you assume that I can't think for myself just because I disagree with you?
You yourself said that if someone fears death, they get what the establishment calls lung cancer (which is not excess alveoli btw). Then you said that if someone gets over their fear of death, this resolution manifests as tuberculosis. So while I should have said lung cancer instead of bone cancer, my assessment that I'm screwed either way is accurate. Pointing out the absurdities of your theory is not a strawman.